98-1491. Nikko Research Center (America), Inc.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 3363-3364]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-1491]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Rel. No. IA-1694/803-128]
    
    
    Nikko Research Center (America), Inc.; Notice of Application
    
    January 15, 1998.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment 
    Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANT: Nikko Research Center (America), Inc.
    
    relevant advisers act sections: Exemption requested under section 
    203A(c) from section 203A(a).
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant requests an order to permit it to 
    register with the SEC as an investment adviser.
    
    FILING DATES: The application was filed on December 3, 1997.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on February 9, 
    1998, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicant, in 
    the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. 
    Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the 
    reason for the request, and the issues contested. persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 5th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20549. Applicant, Nikko Research Center (America), Inc., One World 
    Financial Center, Tower A, 200 Liberty Street, New York, New York 
    10281.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy D. Ireland, Attorney, at (202) 
    942-0530, or Jennifer S. Choi, Special Counsel, at (202) 942-0716 
    (Division of Investment Management, Task Force on Investment Adviser 
    Regulation).
    
    Supplementary Information: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the 
    SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicant's Representations
    
        1. Applicant is a corporation organized under the laws of New York 
    and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Nikko Research Center, Ltd. 
    (``NRC''), an unregistered investment adviser located in Japan, which 
    is affiliated with the Nikko Securities Co., Ltd. (``NST''), an 
    integrated financial services company also located in Japan.
        2. Applicant maintains its principal place of business in New York 
    and is currently registered as an investment adviser in New York. 
    Applicant was registered with the SEC as an investment adviser until 
    July 8, 1997.
        3. Pursuant to separate service agreements between applicant and 
    NRC, NST, and Nikko Securities Co. International, Inc. (``NSI''), a 
    registered broker-dealer located in the United States and an indirect 
    wholly-owned subsidiary of NST, applicant provides NRC, NST, and NSI 
    with reports concerning national and international political, economic, 
    financial, and investment matters to assist them with the services that 
    they provide to their clients. Some of these reports may be distributed 
    directly by NSI and NST to their institutional clients, and NST may 
    distribute such reports to certain retail clients, all of whom are in 
    Japan. NSI does not have retail clients.
        4. Applicant's analysts, strategists, and economists speak at 
    seminars for clients of NSI, all of which are U.S. affiliates of 
    Japanese-based banking institutions. NSI mails seminar materials 
    directly to other institutional clients.
        5. Applicant's analysts and economists also periodically meet 
    directly with certain institutional clients of NSI and NST, including 
    U.S. subsidiaries of Japanese regional banks, insurance companies, and 
    Japanese banks and trust companies.\1\ The foregoing are the only 
    direct contacts applicant has with clients of NSI and NST. Applicant 
    does not and will not have any direct contacts with any clients of NRC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Although NST has retail as well as institutional clients, 
    applicant only has direct contact with certain of NST's 
    institutional clients.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        6. Applicant receives compensation solely from NRC, NSI and NST in 
    an amount equivalent to its total annual operational cost plus 3%.
    
    Applicant's Legal Analysis
    
        1. On October 11, 1996, the National Securities Markets Improvement 
    Act of 1996 was enacted. Title III of the Act, the Investment Advisers 
    Supervision Coordination Act, added new section 203A to the Advisers 
    Act. Under section 203A(a)(1),\2\ an investment adviser that is 
    regulated or required to be regulated as an investment adviser in the 
    state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business 
    is prohibited from registering with the SEC unless the investment 
    adviser (i) has assets under management of not less than $25 million or 
    (ii) is an adviser to an investment company registered under the 
    Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Investment Company Act''). Section 
    203A(a)(2) defines the phrase ``assets under management'' as the 
    ``securities portfolios with respect to which an investment adviser 
    provides continuous and regular supervisory or management 
    services.''\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(a)(1).
        \3\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(a)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. Applicant submits that section 203A of the Advisers Act is 
    intended to streamline the registration and oversight of investment 
    advisers by reallocating responsibilities between the SEC and the 
    states. Applicant notes that Congress determined that the states should 
    be responsible for regulating investment advisers ``whose activities 
    are likely to
    
    [[Page 3364]]
    
    be concentrated in their home state,'' but ``[l]arger advisers, with 
    national businesses,'' should be regulated by the SEC and be ``subject 
    to national rules.''\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ S. Rep. No. 293, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. 4 (1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        3. Section 203A(c) of the Advisers Act authorizes the SEC to permit 
    an investment adviser to register with the SEC if prohibiting 
    registration would be ``unfair, a burden on interstate commerce, or 
    otherwise inconsistent with the purpose of [section 203A].''\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(c).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        4. Applicant states that it does not qualify for SEC registration 
    under section 203A. Applicant submits that it does not have assets 
    under management or act as an investment adviser to an investment 
    company registered as such under the Investment Company Act. Applicant 
    also states that it does not satisfy any of the exemptions from the 
    prohibition on registration provided in rule 203A-2 under the Advisers 
    Act.
        5. Applicant asserts that it would be inconsistent with the 
    purposes of section 203A if it were prohibited from registering with 
    the SEC. Applicant submits that its activities, like those of the 
    nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (``NRSROs'') and 
    pension consultants, affect the national and international securities 
    markets.
        6. Applicant states that its research reports focus primarily on 
    issues of national and international scope and significance. Applicant 
    states that its advisory services are provided to only three clients 
    for compensation, and that those entities utilize applicant's services 
    in connection with the delivery of services to their own clients, many 
    of which are substantial institutional investors, such as banks, 
    insurance companies, and trust companies located throughout the world, 
    that collectively manage and/or invest billions of dollars in both 
    foreign and domestic securities. Applicant asserts that, the 
    significant resources of these institutional investors, which may 
    utilize its research and analyses in connection with their own 
    investment management activities, substantially affect both national 
    and international securities markets.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ Applicant also notes that its services reach certain 
    institutional investors even more directly. As described above, 
    applicant gives seminar presentations for certain of NSI's clients, 
    and holds individual meetings directly with certain clients of NSI 
    and NST, all which are institutional investors with a national or 
    international presence.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        7. Applicant states that the SEC exempted NRSROs from the 
    prohibition on SEC registration although they typically do not have 
    assets under management or act as investment advisers to registered 
    investment companies because their activities have a significant effect 
    on the national securities markets and the operation of federal 
    securities laws.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ Rules Implementing Amendments to the Investment Advisers Act 
    of 1940, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 1633 at Section II.D.1. 
    (May 15, 1997) [62 FR 28112 (May 22, 1997)].
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        8. Applicant also states that the SEC exempted certain pension 
    consultants from the prohibition on SEC registration even though they 
    may not have assets under management or act as investment advisers to 
    registered investment companies because they have a direct effect on 
    the management of billions of dollars of plan assets, which in turn 
    affects the national markets.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ Id. at Section II.D.2.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        9. Applicant also submits that it would be inconsistent with the 
    purposes of section 203A(b)(1)(A) if it were subject to state 
    regulation. Applicant states that, pursuant to this section, Congress 
    preserved the states' ability to regulate certain investment adviser 
    representatives of investment advisers registered with the SEC if those 
    representatives provide services to retail clients. Applicant submits 
    that Congress determined that the primary interest of the states is to 
    maintain oversight of representatives with retail, and not 
    institutional, clientele because the activities of these 
    representatives predominately affect local markets. Applicant states 
    that in defining the term ``investment adviser representative'' for 
    purposes of section 203A(b), the SEC noted its belief that it is 
    consistent with the intent of Congress to distinguish between retail 
    and other clients.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ Id. at Section II.F.1.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        10. Applicant states that it does not provide investment advisory 
    services directly to retail clients. Applicant submits that its three 
    clients are institutions whose activities are national and 
    international in scope. Further, applicant states that the advisory 
    services that it provides to its clients are primarily used by such 
    clients in connection with the services that they provide to their own 
    clients, which are almost exclusively institutional.\10\ Applicant 
    states that, because its services are provided primarily to 
    institutions, it is not the sort of investment adviser that Congress 
    intended to be subject to regulation by and registration with the 
    states.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ Of applicant's three clients, only NST has retail clients, 
    all of whom are outside the United States. Applicant has no direct 
    contacts with any of NST's retail clients.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        11. Applicant believes that Congress intended that national 
    investment advisers remain subject to SEC oversight, in part to focus 
    SEC supervision and examination resources on investment advisers 
    involved in interstate commerce. Applicant contends that the national 
    and international nature of its activities lends itself to supervision 
    and examination by one regulatory body.
    
        For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
    delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-1491 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/22/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act'').
Document Number:
98-1491
Dates:
The application was filed on December 3, 1997.
Pages:
3363-3364 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Rel. No. IA-1694/803-128
PDF File:
98-1491.pdf