99-1480. Revocation of Tolerances and Exemptions from the Requirement of a Tolerance for Canceled Pesticide Active Ingredients; Correction  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 14 (Friday, January 22, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 3427-3428]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-1480]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [OPP-300735A; FRL-6044-2]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Revocation of Tolerances and Exemptions from the Requirement of a 
    Tolerance for Canceled Pesticide Active Ingredients; Correction
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule; correction.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA published in the Federal Register of October 26, 1998, a 
    document announcing the revocation of tolerances for residues of the 
    pesticides listed in the regulatory text. The amendatory language for 
    one of the sections was incorrect. This document corrects that 
    language.
    
     DATES: This correction becomes effective January 25, 1999.
    
     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For technical information contact: 
    Joseph Nevola, Special Review Branch, (7508C), Special Review and 
    Reregistration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location: Special Review Branch, Crystal Mall #2,
    
    [[Page 3428]]
    
    6th floor, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. Telephone: (703) 
    308-8037; e-mail: nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published a document on October 26, 1998 
    (63 FR 57062) (FRL-6035-7), announcing the revocation of tolerances for 
    residues of the pesticides listed in the regulatory text. In the final 
    rule, EPA responded to a comment from Rhone-Poulenc AG Company which 
    requested that certain tolerances for phosalone not be revoked, but 
    retained so that those commodities could be legally imported into the 
    United States. One of the tolerances Rhone-Poulenc wanted to retain was 
    for almonds which was covered by the ``nuts'' crop group tolerance. The 
    Agency revoked the tolerances for phosalone on nuts and should have 
    added an entry for almonds; however, this was inadvertently not done. 
    Therefore, the amendatory language to Sec. 180.263 for phosalone was 
    incorrect. This document will correct that language.
    
    I. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
        This final rule does not impose any new requirements. It only 
    implements a technical correction to the Code of Federal Regulations 
    (CFR). As such, this action does not require review by the Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866, entitled 
    Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or Executive 
    Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health 
    Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does 
    not impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or 
    impose any significant or unique impact on small governments as 
    described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 
    104-4). Nor does it require prior consultation with State, local, and 
    tribal government officials as specified by Executive Order 12875, 
    entitled Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership (58 FR 58093, 
    October 28, 1993) and Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and 
    Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19, 
    1998), or special consideration of environmental justice related issues 
    under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address 
    Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
    Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). This action does not 
    involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration 
    of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the 
    National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Pub. 
    L. 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). In addition, since this 
    action is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the 
    Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or any other statute, it is not 
    subject to the regulatory flexibility provisions of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
    
    II. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of this rule in the Federal Register. This is a 
    technical corection to the Federal Register and is not a ``major rule'' 
    as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
     List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
         Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and record 
    keeping requirements.
    
    Dated: December 24, 1998.
    
    Jack E. Housenger,
    Acting Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of 
    Pesticide Programs.
        In FR Doc. 98-28486 published on October 26, 1998 (63 FR 57062), 
    make the following correction:
    
    
    Sec. 180.263  [Corrected]
    
        On page 57066, in the third column, the amendatory language for 
    Sec. 180.263 is corrected to read as follows:
        e. By removing from Sec. 180.263, the entries for ``artichokes''; 
    ``cattle, fat''; ``cattle, meat''; ``cattle, mbyp''; ``citrus fruits''; 
    ``goats, fat''; ``goats, meat''; ``goats, mbyp''; ``hogs, fat''; 
    ``hogs, meat''; ``hogs, mbyp''; ``horses, fat''; ``horses, meat''; 
    ``horses, mbyp''; ``nectarines''; ``Nuts''; ``potatoes''; ``sheep, 
    fat''; ``sheep,meat''; and ``sheep, mbyp''; and by adding the entry for 
    ``almonds'' to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.263  Phosalone; tolerances for residues.
    
    * * * * *
    
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Commodity                        Parts per million
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Almond....................................  0.1
     
                      *        *        *        *        *
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 99-1480 Filed 1-21-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/25/1999
Published:
01/22/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; correction.
Document Number:
99-1480
Dates:
This correction becomes effective January 25, 1999.
Pages:
3427-3428 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPP-300735A, FRL-6044-2
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
99-1480.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.263