95-1292. Temporary Speed Limits for the St. Marys River  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 4378-4379]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-1292]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    33 CFR Part 161
    
    [CGD09-94-036]
    RIN 2115-AF01
    
    
    Temporary Speed Limits for the St. Marys River
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Temporary final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commander of the Ninth Coast Guard District is making a 
    temporary amendment to the speed limits for the St. Marys River during 
    the 1994-95 icebreaking season. This amendment reduces the speed limit 
    by 2 miles per hour through that part of the system, between Munuscong 
    Lake Lighted Buoy 8 and Lake Nicolet Light 80 upbound and between Lake 
    Nicolet Light 80 and Munuscong Lake light 9 downbound. These temporary 
    changes to the speed regulations are a precautionary measure to 
    minimize any possible damage to the environment due to movement of 
    large commercial vessels through the ice.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation is effective from December 29, 1994, 
    through April 15, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Scott J. Smith, Lieutenant, U.S. Coast Guard, Aids to Navigation and 
    Waterways Management Branch, Ninth Coast Guard District, 1240 East 9th 
    Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44199-2060, (216) 522-3990.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553, a Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking has not been published for this regulation and good 
    cause exists for making it effective in less than 30 days from the date 
    of publication. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking and 
    delay in the effective date would be contrary to the public interest 
    because immediate [[Page 4379]] action is necessary to prevent possible 
    damage to the environment. Additionally, the Coast Guard issued this 
    temporary rule for the 1993-94 icebreaking season and no comments were 
    received. Therefore, nothing would apparently be gained by pre-
    publication.
    
    Discussion of Regulations
    
        In a letter received on February 26, 1993, the Michigan Department 
    of Natural Resources advised the Commander of the Ninth Coast Guard 
    District of concerns over the environmental impact of ship transits 
    through the St. Marys River during the period of March 21 to April 1. 
    March 25 is the fixed date for the opening of the locks at Sault St. 
    Marie, which allows large commercial shipping access to the St. Marys 
    River from Lake Superior. In accordance with an agreement reached on 
    June 29, 1993, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and 
    Wildlife Service and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, the 
    Commander of the Ninth Coast Guard District is making this temporary 
    change to the speed regulations during periods when icebreaking is 
    being conducted in the vicinity of Neebish Island, St. Mary's River, 
    Michigan, as a precautionary measure to minimize any possible damage to 
    the environment. The speed limit is being reduced by 2 statute miles 
    per hour in the area between Munuscong Lake Lighted Buoy 8 and Lake 
    Nicolet Light 80, upbound, and between Lake Nicolet Lighted Buoy 80 and 
    Munuscong Lake Light 9, downbound. The Light 9 checkpoint has been 
    added to extend the reduced speed limit area past Winter Point, thereby 
    protecting the sensitive environment between Winter Point and Light 9. 
    Speed limits apply to the average speed between established reporting 
    points.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The drafters of this regulation are Byron D. Willeford, Lieutenant 
    Junior Grade, U.S. Coast Guard, Project Officer, Aids to Navigation & 
    Waterways Management Branch and Karen E. Lloyd, Lieutenant, U.S. Coast 
    Guard, Project Attorney, Ninth Coast Guard District Legal Office.
    
    Federalism Implications
    
        This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612, and it has been determined 
    that the rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism implications to 
    warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        A recent environmental impact study by the United States Army Corps 
    of Engineers indicated that March 21 is the optimal opening date. (see 
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 
    Opening Operations of the Lock Facilities on March 21 (February 1993), 
    Supplement III to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Operations, 
    Maintenance, and Minor Improvements of the Federal Facilities at Sault 
    Ste. Marie, Michigan (July 1977)). The same study by the Corps of 
    Engineers indicates that there is no significant impact on fish 
    populations due to movement of large commercial vessels through the 
    ice. However, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources asserts that 
    there may be such an impact during the early period of March 21 to 
    April 1.
        The Ninth Coast Guard District has adopted the U.S. Army Corps of 
    Engineers EIS, EIS Supplements, and EIS studies on Operations, 
    Maintenance, and Minor Improvements of the Federal Facilities at Sault 
    Ste. Marie, Michigan. In addition, the Coast Guard is preparing a 
    supplement for the 1974 Ninth Coast Guard District EIS regarding 
    icebreaking activity on the Great Lakes.
    
    Economic Assessment and Certification
    
        This regulation is not a significant regulatory action under 
    section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an 
    assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of 
    that order. It has been exempted from review by the Office of 
    Management and Budget under that order. It is not significant under the 
    regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation 
    (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the 
    economic impact of this regulation to be so minimal that a full 
    Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies 
    and procedures of the DOT is unnecessary.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This regulation will impose no collection of information 
    requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 161
    
        Harbors, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Vessels, Waterways.
    
    Regulations
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, the Coast Guard temporarily 
    amends part 161 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
    
    PART 161--VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
    
        1. The authority citation for 33 CFR part 161 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 49 CFR 1.46.
    
        2. From December 29, 1994 through April 15, 1995, Sec. 161.880 is 
    suspended and a new Sec. 161.881 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 161.881  Maximum speed limits.
    
        (a) The following speed limits indicate the average speed over the 
    ground between reporting points:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Speed limit    
                   The speed limitbetween               --------------------
                                                         Miles/hr    Knots  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    De Tour Reef Light and Sweets Point Light..........        14       12.2
    Round Island Light and Point Aux Frenes Light 21...        14       12.2
    Munuscong Lake Lighted Buoy 8 and Everns Point.....        10        8.7
    Everns Point and Reed Point........................         7        6.0
    Reed Point and Lake Nicolet Lighted Buoy 62........         8        7.0
    Lake Nicolet Lighted Buoy 62 and Lake Nicolet Light                     
     80................................................        10        8.7
    Lake Nicolet Lighted Buoy 80 and Munuscong Lake                         
     Light 9 (downbound, West Neebish Channel).........         8        7.0
    Lake Nicolet Light 80 and Winter Point (West                            
     Neebish Channel)..................................         8        7.0
    Lake Nicolet Light 80 and Six Mile Point Range Rear                     
     Light.............................................        10        8.7
    Six Mile Point Range Rear Light and lower limit of                      
     the St. Marys Falls Canal:                                             
        Upbound........................................         8        7  
        Downbound......................................        10        8.7
    Upper limit of the St. Marys Falls Canal and Point                      
     Aux Pins Main Light...............................        12       10.4
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (b) Effective date. This section is effective from 8 a.m. (EDST) 
    December 29, 1994, through 8 a.m. (EDST) on April 15, 1995, unless 
    otherwise terminated by the Ninth Coast Guard District Aids to 
    Navigation Branch.
    
        Dated: December 29, 1994.
    Paul J. Pluta,
    Captain, Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting.
    [FR Doc. 95-1292 Filed 1-20-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/29/1994
Published:
01/23/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Temporary final rule.
Document Number:
95-1292
Dates:
This regulation is effective from December 29, 1994, through April 15, 1995.
Pages:
4378-4379 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD09-94-036
RINs:
2115-AF01
PDF File:
95-1292.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 161.881