96-775. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 23, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 1716-1718]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-775]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CA 157-1-7223a; FRL-5317-2]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California 
    State Implementation Plan Revision; Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality 
    Management District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
    California State Implementation Plan. The revisions concern rules from 
    the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD). 
    The rules control VOC emissions from the transfer of gasoline into 
    stationary storage tanks and vehicle fuel tanks. This approval action 
    will incorporate these rules into the Federally approved SIP. The 
    intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of 
    volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements 
    of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). In addition, 
    the final action on these rules serves as a final determination that 
    the deficiencies in these rules have been corrected and that on the 
    effective date of this action, any sanction or Federal Implementation 
    Plan (FIP) clock is stopped. Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of 
    these revisions into the California SIP under provisions of the CAA 
    regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and 
    secondary ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for 
    nonattainment areas.
    
    DATES: This action is effective on March 25, 1996 unless adverse or 
    critical comments are received by February 22, 1996. If the effective 
    date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    
    [[Page 1717]]
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation report for each 
    rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are 
    available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental 
    Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 
    94105.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
    SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
    Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, 8411 Jackson 
    Road, Sacramento, CA 95826.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mae Wang, Rulemaking Section (A-5-3), 
    Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
    IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-
    1200.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment 
    areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 
    (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Sacramento Metro Area. 
    43 FR 8964, 40 CFR 81.305. On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor 
    of California, pursuant to section 110(a)(2) of the 1977 Act, that the 
    above district's portion of the California SIP was inadequate to attain 
    and maintain the ozone standard and requested that deficiencies in the 
    existing SIP be corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 1990, the 
    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-549, 104 
    Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. In amended section 
    182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, Congress statutorily adopted the requirement 
    that nonattainment areas fix their deficient reasonably available 
    control technology (RACT) rules for ozone and established a deadline of 
    May 15, 1991 for states to submit corrections of those deficiencies.
        Section 182(a)(2)(A) applies to areas designated as nonattainment 
    prior to enactment of the amendments and classified as marginal or 
    above as of the date of enactment. It requires such areas to adopt and 
    correct RACT rules pursuant to pre-amended section 172(b) as 
    interpreted in pre-amendment guidance.1 EPA's SIP-Call used that 
    guidance to indicate the necessary corrections for specific 
    nonattainment areas. At the time of enactment of the CAA amendments, 
    the Sacramento Metro Area was classified as serious 2; therefore, 
    this area was subject to the RACT fix-up requirement and the May 15, 
    1991 deadline.
    
        \1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of 
    those portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide 
    policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues 
    Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, 
    Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register 
    Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the 
    Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control 
    technique guidelines (CTGs).
        \2\ The Sacramento Metro Area was reclassified from serious to 
    severe on June 1, 1995. See 60 FR 20237 (April 25, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This document addresses EPA's direct final action for SMAQMD Rule 
    448, Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers, and Rule 
    449, Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks. The SMAQMD adopted 
    these rules on February 2, 1995. These rules were submitted by the 
    California Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on August 10, 1995. The 
    submitted rules were found to be complete on October 4, 1995 pursuant 
    to EPA's completeness criteria that are set forth in 40 CFR part 51 
    Appendix V 3 and are being finalized for approval into the SIP.
    
        \3\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990 
    (55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, 
    revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Rule 448 controls VOC emissions during gasoline transfer to 
    stationary storage tanks. Rule 449 controls emissions from vehicle fuel 
    tank filling operations. VOCs contribute to the production of ground 
    level ozone and smog. These rules were originally adopted as part of 
    SMAQMD's effort to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
    for ozone and in response to EPA's SIP-Call and the section 
    182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. The following is EPA's evaluation and 
    final action for each rule.
    
    EPA Evaluation
    
        In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate 
    the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA 
    regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR 
    part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
    Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements, 
    which forms the basis for today's action, appears in the various EPA 
    policy guidance documents listed in footnote 1. Among those provisions 
    is the requirement that a VOC rule must, at a minimum, provide for the 
    implementation of RACT for stationary sources of VOC emissions. This 
    requirement was carried forth from the pre-amended Act.
        For the purpose of assisting State and local agencies in developing 
    RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG) 
    documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act 
    and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source 
    categories. Under the CAA, Congress ratified EPA's use of these 
    documents, as well as other Agency policy, for requiring States to 
    ``fix-up'' their RACT rules. See section 182(a)(2)(A). The CTGs 
    applicable to Rule 448 are entitled Control of Volatile Organic 
    Emissions from Bulk Gasoline Plants, EPA-450/2-77-035; and Control of 
    Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor 
    Collection Systems, EPA-450/2-78-051. Rule 449 was evaluated against 
    EPA's draft model stage II rule, dated August 17, 1992. Further 
    interpretations of EPA policy are found in the Blue Book, referred to 
    in footnote 1. In general, these guidance documents have been set forth 
    to ensure that VOC rules are fully enforceable and strengthen or 
    maintain the SIP.
        SMAQMD's submitted Rule 448 includes the following significant 
    changes from the current SIP:
        1. Executive Officer discretion in approving equivalent test 
    methods has been removed.
        2. Data on agricultural tanks has been submitted in the form of a 
    5% determination in order to justify the agricultural tank exemption.
        3. A pressure vacuum valve requirement has been added.
        SMAQMD's submitted Rule 449 includes the following significant 
    changes from the current SIP:
        1. Executive Officer discretion in approving equivalent test 
    methods has been removed.
        2. Testing provisions have been added to require dynamic back 
    pressure tests and static leak tests at least every 5 years.
        3. Test results must be reported to the district within 30 days of 
    test completion.
        EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they 
    are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
    Therefore, SMAQMD Rule 448 and Rule 449 are being approved under 
    section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements of section 
    110(a) and part D. The final action on these rules serves as a final 
    determination that the deficiencies in 
    
    [[Page 1718]]
    these rules have been corrected. Therefore, if this direct final action 
    is not withdrawn, on March 25, 1996, any sanction or FIP clock is 
    stopped.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation 
    plan. Each request for revision to the State implementation plan shall 
    be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
    environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and 
    regulatory requirements.
        EPA is publishing this notice without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be 
    effective March 25, 1996, unless, within 30 days of its publication, 
    adverse or critical comments are received.
        If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn 
    before the effective date by publishing a subsequent notice that will 
    withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
    proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
    this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
    do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is 
    advised that this action will be effective March 25, 1996.
    
    Regulatory Process
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 
    1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed 
    or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in 
    estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector or to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
        Through submission of this State implementation plan or plan 
    revision, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have 
    elected to adopt the program provided for under part D of the Clean Air 
    Act. These rules may bind State, local, and tribal governments to 
    perform certain actions and also require the private sector to perform 
    certain duties. The rules being approved by this action will impose no 
    new requirements because affected sources are already subject to these 
    regulations under State law. Therefore, no additional costs to State, 
    local, or tribal governments or to the private sector result from this 
    action. EPA has also determined that this direct final action does not 
    include a mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or 
    more to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate or to the 
    private sector.
    
    Small Businesses
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603 and 
    604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I, part 
    D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify 
    that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities 
    affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship 
    under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would 
    constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State 
    action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
    grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. 
    Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).
        This action has been classified as a table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under procedures published in the Federal 
    Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a July 
    10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air 
    and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this 
    regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Dated: October 11, 1995.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator.
    
        Subpart F of part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal 
    Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart F--California
    
        2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(224)(i)(A)(1) 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.220  Identification of Plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (224) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were 
    submitted on August 10, 1995, by the Governor's designee.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District.
        (1) Rule 448 and rule 449, adopted on February 2, 1995.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 96-775 Filed 1-22-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/25/1996
Published:
01/23/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
96-775
Dates:
This action is effective on March 25, 1996 unless adverse or critical comments are received by February 22, 1996. If the effective date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
1716-1718 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA 157-1-7223a, FRL-5317-2
PDF File:
96-775.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.220