97-1625. Public Utility District No. 1 of Lewis County; Notice Granting Extension of Time  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 3504]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-1625]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Project No. 2833-049]
    
    
    Public Utility District No. 1 of Lewis County; Notice Granting 
    Extension of Time
    
    January 16, 1997.
        On November 1, 1996, the Commission issued notice of Public Utility 
    District No. 1 of Lewis County's (Lewis County) application for 
    amendment of the license for its Cowlitz Falls Project No. 2833, 
    located on the Cowlitz River in Lewis County, Washington. On December 
    19, 1996, American Whitewater Affiliation and Rivers Council of 
    Washington (AWA) jointly filed a timely motion to intervene in 
    opposition in the amendment proceeding. Pursuant to Rule 213(d) of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,\1\ the deadline for 
    answers to AWA's motion was January 3, 1997.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 18 CFR 385.213(d).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        On December 31, 1996, because of its delayed receipt of AWA's 
    motion, Lewis County filed a request for a 30-day extension of time to 
    answer the motion. Pursuant to Rule 213(d), Lewis County is granted a 
    15-day extension of time to file an answer to AWA's intervention 
    motion.\2\ Accordingly, the answer must be filed within 15 days of the 
    issuance of this notice.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Section 213(d) of the Commission's Regulations provides 
    that, generally, any answer to a motion must be made within 15 days 
    after the motion is filed. Furthermore, answers to intervention 
    motions are to address only the standing to intervene and not the 
    merits of the intervenor's position, and 15 days is an adequate 
    amount of time in which to do so.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-1625 Filed 1-22-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/23/1997
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-1625
Pages:
3504-3504 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Project No. 2833-049
PDF File:
97-1625.pdf