97-1729. Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders; Week of October 28 Through November 1, 1996  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 3676-3677]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-1729]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
    
    
    Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders; Week of October 28 
    Through November 1, 1996
    
        During the week of October 28 through November 1, 1996, the 
    decisions and orders summarized below were issued with respect to 
    appeals, applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the 
    Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The 
    following summary also contains a list of submissions that were 
    dismissed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
        Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available 
    in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 
    Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, 
    Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours 
    of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also 
    available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a 
    commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and 
    orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide 
    Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.
    
        Dated: January 16, 1997.
    George B. Breznay,
    Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    
    Decision List No. 5--Week of October 28 Through November 1, 1996
    
    Appeals
    
    Action and Associates, Inc., 10/28/96, VFA-0224
    
        Action and Associates, Inc. (Action) filed an Appeal from a 
    determination issued to it by the DOE's Savannah River Operations 
    Office (DOE/SR). In its Appeal, Action asserted that DOE/SR did not 
    conduct an adequate search for records that Action had requested 
    pursuant to the FOIA. Action also challenged the amount it was charged 
    for the documents it obtained pursuant to its FOIA Request. The DOE 
    determined that DOE/SR had conducted an adequate search for records and 
    that its assessment of fees was appropriate and reasonable. 
    Consequently, Action's Appeal was denied.
    
    Harold Bibeau, 10/28/96, VFA-0223
    
        Harold Bibeau filed an Appeal from a denial issued to him by the 
    DOE's Office of Human Radiation Experiments (OHRE) of a Request for 
    Information which he had submitted under the Freedom of Information Act 
    (FOIA). In considering the Appeal, the DOE found that OHRE had 
    conducted a search reasonably calculated to find the requested 
    information, and that all responsive documents had been released to Mr. 
    Bibeau. However, in his Appeal, Mr. Bibeau expanded his original 
    request. OHRE agreed to do a new search for the newly-requested 
    documents. Therefore, the Appeal was denied.
    
    Malcolm Parvey, 11/1/96, VFA-0225
    
        Malcolm Parvey filed a Motion for Reconsideration of a Decision and 
    Order which denied his Appeal of two determinations by the Western Area 
    Power Administration (WAPA) under the Freedom of Information Act 
    (FOIA). In those determinations, WAPA released some information to Mr. 
    Parvey and charged him a total fee of $96.25. Mr. Parvey's Motion 
    reiterates the arguments made in his original Appeal. Because Mr. 
    Parvey did not present any new evidence or arguments, the DOE denied 
    his Motion for Reconsideration.
    
    Personnel Security Review
    
    Oakland Operations Office, 10/28/96, VSA-0088
    
        The DOE's Office of Safeguards and Security (OSS) filed a Request 
    for Review of a DOE Hearing Officer's recommendation to restore the 
    access authorization of an individual. The individual's access 
    authorization was suspended upon receipt of information indicating the 
    individual had tested positive for the presence of marijuana. The 
    Hearing Officer found that the individual had mitigated DOE security 
    concerns through his explanation that his marijuana use was limited and 
    through his participation in a drug rehabilitation program. In 
    considering the OSS Request for Review, the Director of the Office of 
    Hearings and Appeals found that the Hearing Officer did not have 
    sufficient evidence before him to support the finding that the 
    individual's use of marijuana was limited. The Director noted that the 
    individual failed to provide any evidence to corroborate the 
    circumstances surrounding his marijuana use. The Director found that 
    since the Hearing Officer's conclusions concerning rehabilitation were 
    premised on limited marijuana use, these conclusions could not be 
    sustained. Accordingly, the Director recommended that the individual's 
    access authorization not be restored.
    
    Refund Applications
    
    Good Hope Refineries/Ashland Company, 10/30/96, RF339-6
    
        Ashland Petroleum Company filed an Application for Refund in the 
    Good Hope Refineries II Refund Proceeding. The DOE denied Ashland's 
    application after finding that Ashland had failed to establish injury 
    by rebutting the spot purchaser presumption.
    
    Tajon, Inc., 11/01/96, RR272-229
    
        The DOE considered a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Tajon, 
    Inc. in the crude oil overcharge refund proceeding. In that Motion, 
    Tajon argued that the DOE had improperly rescinded a prior crude oil 
    overcharge refund granted to the firm. The prior refund was rescinded 
    because Tajon had submitted a waiver of its rights to receive such a 
    refund in connection with filing a refund claim in the Surface 
    Transporters refund proceeding. In the Motion, Tajon contended that the 
    waiver should not be considered valid because (a) gallonage information 
    accompanying the claim was incomplete and (b) the required notarization 
    was not made. However, in reviewing the waiver, the DOE found that the 
    specification of gallonage was adequate, even if not fully 
    corroborated, and that an affirmation by the firm's attorney had been 
    substituted for the notarization. In view of these findings the DOE 
    determined that the waiver should be considered effective, and that the 
    Motion for Reconsideration should be denied.
    
    Refund Applications
    
    The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following                                                         
     Decisions and Orders concerning refund applications,                                                           
     which are not summarized. Copies of the full texts of                                                          
     the Decisions and Orders are available in the Public                                                           
     Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.                                                          
    ASPHALT PRODUCTS CORP..................................  RF272-69293                                     11/1/96
    
    [[Page 3677]]
    
                                                                                                                    
    ASPHALT PRODUCTS CORP..................................  RD272-69293                              ..............
    CENTRAL PETROLEUM CO...................................  RF272-95128                                    10/31/96
    FARMERS UNION CO-OP GIN................................  RF272-95146                              ..............
    CRUDE OIL SUPPLE REF DIST..............................  RB272-00090                                    10/30/96
    CRUDE OIL SUPPLE REF DIST..............................  RB272-00091                                    10/30/96
    KENNY LARSON OIL/D&A PUMP & SUPPLY.....................  RF356-1                                        10/31/96
    PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC..............................  RF356-3                                  ..............
    SCHULZ SAMITARY SERVICE................................  RF356-2                                  ..............
    MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC................................  RC272-00352                                    10/30/96
    REIMER EXPRESS LINES, LTD. ET AL.......................  RG272-00500                                     11/1/96
    SOUTHWEST COCA-COLA BOTTLING, INC......................  RF272-95148                                    10/28/96
    STROH BREWERY CO.......................................  RK272-03550                                    10/30/96
    F & M SCHAEFER BREWING CO..............................  RC272-00357                              ..............
    F & M SCHAEFER BREWING CO..............................  RK272-03551                              ..............
    JOS. SCCHLITZ BREWING CO...............................  RK272-03552                              ..............
    TRANS-MEDITERRANEAN AIR WAYS...........................  RG272-616                                       11/1/96
    ROGERS TEXACO SVC. STA.................................  RF272-89303                              ..............
    UNION DE TRANSPORTS AERIENS ET AL......................  RK272-03493                                    10/28/96
    WALTER RAMSEY ET AL....................................  RK272-01546                                    10/30/96
                                                                                                                    
    
    Dismissals
    
        The following submissions were dismissed.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Name                               Case No.        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ALLIED TOWING CORPORATION....................  RF272-91917              
    APEA GAS STATION.............................  RF300-15288              
    DIVERSIFIED AMSRIEA, INC.....................  RK272-03254              
    FAIRMONT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION.............  RG272-496                
    FOIA GROUP, INC..............................  VFA-0234                 
    FOOTE & DAVIES TRANSPORT.....................  RK272-03537              
    KAREN COLEMAN WILTSHIRE......................  VFA-0225                 
    OIL CHEM, INC................................  RF272-97444              
    ZOGLEMAN ENTERPRISES.........................  RF272-95108              
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [FR Doc. 97-1729 Filed 1-23-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/24/1997
Department:
Hearings and Appeals Office, Interior Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-1729
Pages:
3676-3677 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-1729.pdf