[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3678-3679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders; Week of December 9
Through December 13, 1996
During the week of December 9 through December 13, 1996, the
decisions and orders summarized below were issued with respect to
appeals, applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the
Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The
following summary also contains a list of submissions that were
dismissed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available
in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals,
Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours
of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also
available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a
commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and
orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide
Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.
Dated: January 16, 1997.
George B. Breznay,
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Decision List No. 11--Week of December 9 Through December 13, 1996
Refund Application
Shell Oil Co./Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 12/13/96, RR-
315-11
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Inc. (Santa Fe)
filed a motion for reconsideration of a denial by the Department of
Energy's (DOE) Office of Hearings and Appeal of an application for an
above-volumetric refund claim in the DOE's Subpart V Shell Oil Company
refund proceeding. In considering the Motion for reconsideration, OHA
found that Santa Fe's contention that Shell should use a different May
15, 1973 price to calculate the Maximum Legal Selling Price for diesel
fuel at two of Shell's refineries was without merit. The DOE also
applied the doctrine of res judicata in finding that Santa Fe's above-
volumetric claim was barred by its prior settlement of a lawsuit
concerning the same issues.
Refund Applications
The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following Decisions
and Orders concerning refund applications, which are not summarized.
Copies of the full texts of the Decisions and Orders are available in
the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
J.W. MASSENGILL ESTATE ET AL........................... RK272-01365 12/13/96
OLIVE SPRINGS QUARRY ET AL............................. RG272-18 12/11/96
PAGE CO-OP. FARM BUREAU ET AL.......................... RG272-00875 12/12/96
Dismissals
[[Page 3679]]
The following submissions were dismissed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name Case No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BEN LINE STEAMERS LTD........................ RG272-402
BUFKOR, INC.................................. RG272-905
CHINESE MARITIME TRANSPORT, LTD.............. RG272-400
FARMERS UNION CO-OP OIL CO................... RF272-94747
HAROLD M. CLARK EXCAVATING, INC.............. RK272-3248
SEATTLE SNOHOMISH MILL CO., INC.............. RG272-960
TRANS-WORLD TIRE CORP........................ RG272-800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 97-1731 Filed 1-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
