96-1377. Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 2536-2538]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-1377]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    Employment and Training Administration
    
    
    Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
    Worker Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment 
    Assistance
    
        In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
    amended, the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
    determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
    assistance for workers (TA-W) issued during the period of December.
        In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
    certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
    to be issued, each of the group eligibility 
    
    [[Page 2537]]
    requirements of Section 222 of the Act must be met.
        (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
    workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, have become 
    totally or partially separated,
        (2) That sales or production, or both, of the firm or subdivision 
    have decreased absolutely, and
        (3) That increases of imports of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate 
    subdivision have contributed importantly to the separations, or threat 
    thereof, and to the absolute decline in sales or production.
    
    Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
    
        In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
    criterion (3) has not been met. A survey of customers indicated that 
    increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker separations 
    at the firm.
    
    TA-W-31,489; Kenton Custom Molding (A Div. of Ripley Industries, Inc), 
    Kenton, TN
    TA-W-31,480; Meehan Tooker, East Rutherford, NJ
    TA-W-31,491; Henry Vogt Machine Co., Sapulpa, OK
    TA-W-31,609; Empire Stamp & Seal Co., New York, NY
    
        In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
    criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
    
    TA-W-31,576; BW/IP International, Inc., Bryon Jackson Pump Div., 
    Fresno, CA
    TA-W-31,523; Wallace & Tlernan, Belleville, NJ
    TA-W-31,484; Compac Industries, North Bergen, NJ
    TA-W-31,616; Ozone Industries, Inc., Ozone Park, NY
    TA-W-31,540; American Banknote Co., Bedford Park, IL
    TA-W-31,527; M & M/Mars, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL
    
        Increased imports did not contribute importantly to worker 
    separations at the firm.
    
    TA-W-31,641; Sons Transportation, Springfield, MA
    TA-W-31,635; Distribution & Auto Service, Inc., Seattle, WA
    TA-W-31,606; Kerr-McGee Refining Corp., Houston, TX
    TA-W-31,551; Gleason Sales & Service, Lansing, MI
    TA-W-31,522; Transco Energy Co., Including Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
    Line Corp and Transco Gas Marketing Co., Houston, TX
    
        The workers firm does not produce an article as required for 
    certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
    
    TA-W-31,619; Destec Energy, Inc., Houston, TX
    
        The investigation revealed that criterion (2) and (3) have not been 
    met. Sales or production did not decline during the relevant period as 
    required for certification. Increases of imports of articles like or 
    directly competitive with articles produced by the firm or appropriate 
    subdivision have not contributed importantly to the separations or 
    threat thereof, and the absolute decline in sales or produciton.
    
    TA-W-31,519; National Fiber Technology (Formerly National Hair 
    Technology), Lawrence, MA
    
        The investigation revealed that criterion (1) and criterion (2) 
    have not been meet. A significant number or proportion of the workers 
    did not become totally or partially separated as required for 
    certification. Sales or production did not decline during the relevant 
    period as required for certification.
    
    Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
    
        The following certifications have been issued; the date following 
    the company name and location for each determination references the 
    impact date for all workers for such determination.
    
    TA-W-31,559; Hettick International, Harrisonville, MO: October 11, 
    1994.
    TA-W-31,604; Fernbrook & Co., Plant #3, Neffs, PA: October 23, 1994.
    TA-W-31,586; Benton Fashions, Benton, PA: October 17, 1994.
    TA-W-31,594; Reservoirs, Inc., Midland, TX: October 19, 1994. October 
    20, 1994.
    TA-W-31,578; SCI Systems, Inc., (Formerly Digital Equipment Corp), 
    Augusta, ME: October 12, 1994.
    TA-W-31,643; Inland Steel Co., East Chicago, IN: November 7, 1994.
    TA-W-31,499; General Electric Co., GE-Transmission Systems, Fort 
    Edward, NY: September 18, 1994.
    TA-W-31,554 & A; Wondermaid, Inc., Washington, MO, MA & New York, NY; 
    October 4, 1994.
    TA-W-31,585; FAD Manufacturing, Inc., Swoyersville, PA; September 17, 
    1994.
    TA-W-31,507; Howden Fan Co., Buffalo, NY; September 26, 1994.
    TA-W-31,505; General Electro Mechanical Corp., Buffalo, NY; September 
    27, 1995.
    TA-W-31,512; TAP Enterprises, Red Oak, IA; October 1, 1994.
    TA-W-31,600; Palm Beach Co., Eastaboga, AL; October 20, 1994.
    TA-W-31,685; Lee Apparel Co., St. Joseph, MO; November 6, 1994.
    TA-W-31,541; Mud Systems, Inc., Wichita, KS; October 4, 1994.
    TA-W-31,428; Shorewood Packaging Corp., Pittsford, NY; September 5, 
    1995.
    TA-W-31,663; J. Lamb, Inc., Engelwood, NJ; November 14, 1994.
    TA-W-31,657; Jos A. Bank, Carroll Street, Hampstead, MD; November 13, 
    1994.
    TA-W-31,496; PQ Corp., Butler, NJ; September 15, 1994.
    TA-W-31,614; Christian Fashions, El Paso, TX; October 25, 1994.
    TA-W-31,423 & A; Astor Knitting Mills, Inc., Reading, PA & Astor 
    Industries, Inc., Reading, PA; September 7, 1994.
    TA-W-31,571; Carl E. Smith, Inc., Sandyville, WV; October 7, 1994.
    TA-W-31,225 & A; Mason Shoe Manufacturing Co., Chippewa Falls, WI and F 
    & F Shoe, Chippewa Falls, WI; June 27, 1994.
    TA-W-31,621; Aquatech, Inc., AKA Greenwood Mills, East West Apparel, El 
    Paso, TX; October 23, 1994.
    TA-W-31,513, TA-W-31,514, TA-W-31,515, TA-W-31,516, TA-W-31,517; 
    Phillips-Van Heusen Co., Ozark, AL, Clayton, AL, Hartford, AL, Opp, AL, 
    Geneva, AL; September 27, 1994.
    
        Also, pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade 
    Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 103-182) concerning transitional 
    adjustment assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA) and in accordance 
    with Section 250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act 
    as amended, the Department of Labor presents summaries of 
    determinations regarding eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA issued 
    during the month of December, 1995.
        In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a 
    certification of eligibility to apply for NAFTA-TAA the following group 
    eligibility requirements of Section 250 of the Trade Act must be met:
        (1) That a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
    workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision thereof, (including 
    workers in any agricultural firm or appropriate subdivision thereof) 
    have become totally or partially separated from employment and either--
        (2) That sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision 
    have decreased absolutely,
    
    [[Page 2538]]
    
        (3) That imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have 
    increased, and that the increases in imports contributed importantly to 
    such workers' separations or threat of separation and to the decline in 
    sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
        (4) That there has been a shift in production by such workers' firm 
    or subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly 
    competitive with articles which are produced by the firm or 
    subdivision.
    
    Negative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
    
        In each of the following cases the investigation revealed that 
    criteria (3) and (4) were not met. Imports from Canada or Mexico did 
    not contribute importantly to workers' separations. There was no shift 
    in production from the subject firm to Canada or Mexico during the 
    relevant period.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-00644; Shanklin Shasta Landclearing Co., Klamath Falls, OR
    NAFTA-TAA-00658; Fernbrook and Co., Plant #3, Neffs, PA
    NAFTA-TAA-00661; Fruit of the Loom, Greensburg, KY
    NAFTA-TAA-00674; Wondermaid, Inc., Washington, MO
    NAFTA-TAA-00695 & A; Colebrook-Terry, Inc., Colebrook Plant, Colebrook, 
    PA & The York Plant, York, PA
    
        In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
    criteria for eligibility have not been met for the reasons specified.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-00678; Sons Transportation, Springfield, MA
    
        The investigation revealed that the workers of the subject firm do 
    not produce an article within the meaning of Section 250(a) of the 
    Trade Act, as amended.
    
    Affirmative Determinations NAFTA-TAA
    
        The following certifications have been issued; the date following 
    the company name & location for each determination references the 
    impact date for all workers for such determination.
    
    NAFTA-TAA-00651; SCI Systems, Inc., (Formerly Digital Equipment Corp), 
    August, ME; October 12, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00665; American Meter Co., Industrial Products Div., Erie, 
    PA; October 27, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00655; Pacific Power & Light Co., Centralia Plant, Centralia, 
    WA; October 24, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00646; Pacific Power, Casper, WY & Other Locations Within 
    Wyoming; October 16, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00680; Inland Steel Co., East Chicago, IN; November 7, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00639; Carl E. Smith, Inc., Sandyville, WV; October 7, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00670; Bausch & Lomb Personal Products Div., Tucker, GA; 
    October 31, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00643; Kenetech Windpower, Portland, OR; October 10, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00667; Diesel Recon Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA; October 25, 
    1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00663; Selmet, Inc., Golf Products Div., Albany, OR; October 
    23, 1994.
    NAFTA-TAA-00671; Aquatech, Inc., A.K.A. Greenwood Mills/East-West 
    Apparel, El Paso, TX; October 30, 1994.
    
        I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
    during the month of December, 1995. Copies of these determinations are 
    available for inspection in Room C-4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
    Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal 
    business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to the above 
    address.
    
        Dated: December 14, 1995.
    Russell Kile,
    Acting Program Manager, Policy & Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
    Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 96-1377 Filed 1-25-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/26/1996
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-1377
Pages:
2536-2538 (3 pages)
PDF File:
96-1377.pdf