99-1649. Acquisition Regulation: Administrative Amendments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 3875-3876]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-1649]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    48 CFR Parts 1516 and 1552
    
    [FRL-6222-5]
    
    
    Acquisition Regulation: Administrative Amendments
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing this 
    final rule to amend the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) (48 CFR 
    Chapter 15) to remove obsolete coverage and make other administrative 
    changes based on recent revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation 
    (FAR). As authorized by section 22(a) of the Office of Federal 
    Procurement Policy Act, 41 U.S.C. 418b, this rule is being issued 
    without notice and opportunity for public comment because it does not 
    impose a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or 
    offerors.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Louise Senzel, U.S. EPA, Office of 
    Acquisition Management, (3802R), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 
    20460, Telephone: (202) 564-4367.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        As part of the FAR 15 rewrite, the statutory fee limitations 
    imposed on cost-plus-fixed fee contracts that had been extended to 
    cost-plus-award fee and cost-plus-incentive fee contracts was 
    eliminated. The current FAR 15 only places limitations on fee for cost-
    plus fixed fee contracts. Additionally, two references included in the 
    EPAAR 1552.242-70 ``Indirect Costs'' clause are no longer valid due to 
    revisions in the FAR. This rule provides revised references to parallel 
    FAR changes.
    
    B. Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes 
    of E.O. 12866; therefore, no review is required by the Office of 
    Information and Regulatory Affairs within the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB).
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because this rule does 
    not contain information collection requirements that require the 
    approval of OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 
    3501 et seq.)
    
    D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The EPA certifies that this rule does not exert a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The 
    requirements to contractors under the rule impose no reporting, 
    recordkeeping, or compliance costs.
    
    E. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
    Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess 
    their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and 
    the private sector. This rule does not contain a Federal mandate that 
    may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, 
    and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in one 
    year. Any private sector costs for this action relate to paperwork 
    requirements and associated expenditures that are far below the level 
    established for UMRA applicability. Thus, the rule is not subject to 
    the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
    
    F. Executive Order 13045
    
        E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks 
    and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule 
    that: (1) Is determined to be economically significant as defined under 
    E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk 
    that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate effect on 
    children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must 
    evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule 
    on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to 
    other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives 
    considered by the Agency.
        EPA interprets E.O. 13045 as applying only to those regulatory 
    actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the 
    analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the potential to 
    influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045 
    because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to 
    mitigate health or safety risks.
    
    G. Executive Order 12875
    
        Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
    required by statute and creates a mandate upon a State, local, or 
    tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds 
    necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those 
    governments, or EPA consults with those governments. If EPA complies by 
    consulting, E.O. 12875 requires EPA to provide OMB a description of the 
    extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected 
    State, local, and tribal governments, the nature of their concerns, 
    copies of any written communications from the governments, and a 
    statement supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, 
    E.O. 12875 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting 
    elected officials and other representatives of State, local, and tribal 
    governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development 
    of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
        Today's rule does not create a mandate on State, local, or tribal 
    governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these 
    entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875 
    do not apply to this rule.
    
    H. Executive Order 13084
    
        Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not 
    required by statute, that significantly or uniquely affects the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial 
    direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal 
    government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
    costs incurred by tribal governments, or EPA consults with those 
    governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. 13084 requires EPA to 
    provide to the OMB, in a separately identified section of the preamble 
    to the rule, a description of
    
    [[Page 3876]]
    
    the extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected 
    tribal governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns, and a 
    statement supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, 
    E.O. 13084 requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting 
    elected and other representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to 
    provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory 
    policies on matters that significantly or uniquely affect their 
    communities.''
        Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the 
    communities of Indian tribal governments. Accordingly, the requirements 
    of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.
    
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
    
        Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
    Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Pub. L. 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 
    note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its 
    regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with 
    applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards 
    are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, 
    sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or 
    adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA 
    to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides 
    not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
        This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. Therefore, 
    EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards. 
    EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the rulemaking and 
    specifically, invites the public to identify potentially-applicable 
    voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such standards should 
    be used in this regulation.
    
    J. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take affect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives and the Comptroller General of United States prior to 
    publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
        Authority: The provisions of this regulation are issued under 5 
    U.S.C. 301; Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1516 and 1552
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Therefore, 48 CFR Chapter 15 is amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 1516--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Parts 1516 and 1552 continues to read 
    as follows:
    
        Authority: Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390, as amended.
    
        2. Section 1516.405, paragraph (b) is amended by removing the words 
    ``in accordance with FAR 15.903(d)'' from the final sentence of the 
    paragraph.
    
    PART 1552--[AMENDED]
    
        3. Section 1552.216-75, is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    1552.216-75  Base fee and award fee proposal.
    
        As prescribed in 1516.405(b), insert the following clause:
    
    Base Fee and Award Fee Proposal (FEB 1999)
    
        For the purpose of this solicitation, offerors shall propose a 
    combination of base fee and award fee. Base fee shall not exceed 3% 
    of the estimated cost, excluding fee, and the award fee shall not be 
    less than ____% of the total estimated cost, excluding fee. The 
    combined percentages of base and award fee shall not exceed ____% of 
    the total estimated cost, excluding fee.
    
    (End of clause)
    
    
    1552.242-70  [Amended]
    
        4. Section 1552.242-70 is amended by revising the reference ``FAR 
    42.703(a)'' in the first paragraph of paragraph (a) in the clause to 
    read ``FAR 42.703-1(a)'' and the reference ``FAR 15.804-4'' in the 
    undesignated paragraph after paragraph (a) in the clause to read ``FAR 
    15.406-2''.
    
        Dated: December 14, 1998.
    Betty L. Bailey,
    Director, Office of Acquisition Management.
    [FR Doc. 99-1649 Filed 1-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/25/1999
Published:
01/26/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-1649
Dates:
February 25, 1999.
Pages:
3875-3876 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6222-5
PDF File:
99-1649.pdf
CFR: (2)
48 CFR 1516
48 CFR 1552