2024-01552. Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Office of the Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense (DoD).

    ACTION:

    Direct final rule; amendment.

    SUMMARY:

    The DoD is amending this part to remove the exemption rules associated with four systems of records notices (SORNs) for the DoD Components listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, under the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended. Elsewhere in today's issue of the Federal Register , the DoD is giving concurrent notice of the rescindment of 23 SORNs, including those that correspond to the exemption rules being removed by this rule amendment. This rule is being published as a direct final rule as the Department does not expect to receive any adverse comments. If such comments are received, this direct final rule will be withdrawn and a proposed rule for comments will be published.

    DATES:

    The rule will be effective on April 5, 2024, unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments will be accepted on or before March 26, 2024.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may submit comments, identified by docket number, Regulation Identifier Number (RIN), and title, by any of the following methods.

    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.

    * Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency, Regulatory Directorate, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox 24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350–1700.

    Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions Start Printed Page 5094 from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Ms. Rahwa Keleta, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil, (703) 571–0070.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    I. Privacy Act Exemption

    The DoD is amending this part to remove the exemption rules associated with the following six SORNs established for the DoD Components.

    Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA):

    System identifier and name. LDIA 0900, Accounts Receivable, Indebtedness and Claims

    System identifier and name. LDIA 12–0002, Privacy and Civil Liberties Case Management System

    Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) (formerly known as Defense Security Service):

    System identifier and name. V5–04, Counterintelligence Issues Database (CII–DB)

    Office of the Inspector General (OIG):

    System identifier and name. CIG–29, Privacy and Civil Liberties Complaint Reporting System

    The Privacy Act permits Federal agencies to exempt eligible records in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including the provisions providing individuals with a right to request access to and amendment of their own records and accountings of disclosures of such records. If an agency intends to exempt a particular system of records, it must first go through the rulemaking process to provide public notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed exemption.

    When a system of records is no longer required to be collected or maintained, the system of records may be discontinued. The notice for that system of record is rescinded in the Federal Register , and the records covered by the rescinded system of records are lawfully transferred or disposed of in accordance with applicable requirements. At the time of rescindment or following rescindment for the system of records notice, Federal agencies will seek to also rescind the associated exemption rules within the Code of Federal Regulations.

    II. Direct Final Rulemaking

    This rule is being published as a direct final rule as the Department does not expect to receive any significant adverse comments. If such comments are received, this direct final rule will be withdrawn and a proposed rule for comments will be published. If no such comments are received, this direct final rule will become effective ten days after the comment period expires.

    For purposes of this rulemaking, a significant adverse comment is one that explains (1) why the rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the rule will be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether a significant adverse comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, the Department will consider whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive response had it been submitted in a standard notice-and-comment process. A comment recommending an addition to the rule will not be considered significant and adverse unless the comment explains how this direct final rule would be ineffective without the addition.

    The DoD is modifying 32 CFR part 310 by rescinding the following regulation provisions (in their entirety) due to the underlying SORNs being rescinded (most of them concurrently by associated public notice):

    32 CFR 310.20(b)(7), System identifier and name. LDIA 0900, Accounts Receivable, Indebtedness and Claims

    32 CFR 310.20(b)(9), System identifier and name. LDIA 12–0002, Privacy and Civil Liberties Case Management System

    32 CFR 310.22(b)(5) System identifier and name. V5–04, Counterintelligence Issues Database (CII–DB)

    32 CFR 310.28(c)(8) System identifier and name. CIG–29, Privacy and Civil Liberties Complaint Reporting System

    Regulatory Analysis

    Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review” and Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review”

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. It has been determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory action under these executive orders.

    Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. DoD will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A major rule may take effect no earlier than 60 calendar days after Congress receives the rule report or the rule is published in the Federal Register , whichever is later. This rule is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Section 202, Public Law 104–4, “Unfunded Mandates Reform Act”

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the private sector, in any one year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. This rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or Tribal Governments, nor will it affect private sector costs.

    Public Law 96–354, “Regulatory Flexibility Act” (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency has certified that this rule is not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule is concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require DoD to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.

    Public Law 96–511, “Paperwork Reduction Act” [44 U.S.C. Chapter 501 et seq.]

    The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was enacted to minimize the paperwork burden for individuals; small businesses; educational and nonprofit institutions; Federal contractors; State, local and tribal governments; and other persons Start Printed Page 5095 resulting from the collection of information by or for the federal government. The Act requires agencies to obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget before using identical questions to collect information from ten or more persons. This rule does not impose reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public.

    Executive Order 13132, “Federalism”

    Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that has federalism implications, imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, and is not required by statute, or has federalism implications and preempts State law. This rule will not have a substantial effect on State and local governments.

    Executive Order 13175, “Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments”

    Executive Order 13175 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes, preempts tribal law, or affects the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. This rule will not have a substantial effect on Indian tribal governments.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310

    • Privacy
    End List of Subjects

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.

    End Authority
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    2. Section 310.20 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs (b)(7) and (b)(9) in their entirety.

    End Amendment Part
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    3. Section 310.22 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (b)(5) in its entirety.

    End Amendment Part
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    4. Section 310.28 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (c)(8) in its entirety.

    End Amendment Part Start Signature

    Dated: January 22, 2024.

    Aaron T. Siegel,

    Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2024–01552 Filed 1–25–24; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/5/2024
Published:
01/26/2024
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule; amendment.
Document Number:
2024-01552
Dates:
The rule will be effective on April 5, 2024, unless comments are received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments will be accepted on or before March 26, 2024.
Pages:
5093-5095 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket ID: DoD-2024-OS-0008
RINs:
0790-AL69: Privacy Act of 1974; Rule Rescindment
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0790-AL69/privacy-act-of-1974-rule-rescindment-
Topics:
Privacy
PDF File:
2024-01552.pdf
CFR: (3)
32 CFR 310.20
32 CFR 310.22
32 CFR 310.28