94-1729. Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program; Fiscal Year 1994; Solicitation of Applications  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-1729]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 27, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part VIII
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Agriculture
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Cooperative State Research Service
    
    
    
    Agricultural Research Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program; Solicitation of 
    Applications; Notice
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Cooperative State Research Service
    Agricultural Research Service
    
     
    
    Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program; Fiscal 
    Year 1994; Solicitation of Applications
    
    Purpose
    
        Proposals are invited for competitive grant awards under the 
    Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program (the ``Program'') 
    for fiscal year 1994. The authority for the Program is contained in 
    section 1668 of Pub. L. 101-624 (the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, 
    and Trade Act of 1990, 7 U.S.C. 5921). The Program is administered by 
    the Cooperative State Research Service (CSRS) and the Agricultural 
    Research Service (ARS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
        The purpose of the Program is to assist Federal regulatory agencies 
    in making science-based decisions about the safety of introducing 
    genetically modified plants, animals, and microorganisms into the 
    environment. The Program accomplishes this purpose by providing 
    scientific information derived from the risk assessment research 
    conducted under it. Research proposals submitted to the Program must be 
    applicable to the purpose of the Program to be considered.
        Proposals based upon field research and whole organism-population 
    level studies are strongly encouraged. Awards will not be made for 
    clinical trials, commercial product development, product marketing 
    strategies, or other research not appropriate to risk assessment. 
    Proposals should be applicable to current regulatory issues surrounding 
    the ecological impacts of genetically modified organisms, with special 
    emphasis on natural ecosystem consequences.
    
    Applicant Eligibility
    
        Proposals may be submitted by any public or private research or 
    educational institution or organization.
    
    Available Funding
    
        The approximate amount available for support of the program in 
    fiscal year 1994 is $1,700,000.
        Pursuant to Section 719 of Pub. L. 103-111 (the Agriculture, Rural 
    Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies 
    Appropriations Act, 1994), funds available in fiscal year 1994 to pay 
    indirect costs on research grants awarded competitively by CSRS may not 
    exceed 14 per centum of the total Federal funds provided under each 
    award.
        In addition, pursuant to sec. 727(b) of Pub. L. 103-111, in the 
    case of any equipment or product that may be authorized to be purchased 
    with the funds provided under this Program, entities are encouraged to 
    use such funds to purchase only American-made equipment or products.
    
    Program Description
    
        Under the Program, USDA will competitively award research grants to 
    support science-based biotechnology regulation and thus help address 
    concerns about the effects of introducing genetically modified 
    organisms into the environment and to help regulators develop policies 
    concerning such introduction. Proposals are invited in the area of 
    biotechnology risk assessment research as appropriate to agricultural 
    plants, animals and microbes. Emphasis will be given to risk assessment 
    research involving genetically modified organisms, but model systems 
    using nongenetically modified organisms also will be considered if they 
    can provide information that could lead to improved assessment of 
    potential risks associated with the introduction of genetically 
    modified organisms into the environment.
        Proposals will be evaluated by a peer panel of scientists for, 
    among other things, science quality; relevance for current regulatory 
    issues; and intent to advance the safe application of biotechnology to 
    agriculture by providing new knowledge for science-based regulatory 
    decisions. The development of better methods for field testing 
    genetically modified organisms will also be considered.
    
    Areas of Research To Be Supported in Fiscal Year 1994
    
        Proposals addressing the following research topics are requested:
        1. Development of new risk assessment methods (e.g. monitoring 
    organism escape, measuring biological impacts), and risk assessment 
    procedures (e.g. comparative analysis of ecosystems, models to predict 
    risks) that could be used in risk assessment of genetically modified 
    fungi, bacteria, viruses (including animal vaccines), plants, 
    arthropods, fish, birds, and mammals. Applicants should address the 
    development of such new risk assessment methods in the course of 
    addressing a specific and defined risk assessment issue, especially as 
    pertains to genetically modified organisms.
        2. Creation of information systems and computer models to support 
    regulatory agency decision-making in regards to potential impacts to 
    the environment over time (e.g., computer models to describe the 
    interaction of environmental and organismal factors especially for 
    establishment and dispersal of the organism).
        3. Risk assessment of the environmental fate (e.g. survival, 
    reproduction fitness, genetic stability, horizontal gene transfer) as 
    correlated with effects (i.e., loss of genetic diversity, enhanced 
    competition) of genetically modified fungi, bacteria, viruses, plants, 
    arthropods, fish, birds and mammals introduced into the environment 
    (e.g., not in a contained laboratory greenhouse or building); and 
    studies or identification of traits which may influence fate and 
    effects.
        In response to requests to Program Directors and Federal regulatory 
    agencies, as stipulated in the authorizing legislation for the Program, 
    section 1668 of Pub. L. 101-624, the following specific areas of risk 
    assessment research have been identified as priorities for this year:
    
    --The bidirectional rates, mechanisms and impact of gene transfer 
    between currently genetically transformable crop species and existing 
    North American wild relatives of those crops including studies of 
    methods of mitigation of potential gene exchange. Species specifically 
    identified by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service include 
    rye, oats, barley, sorghum and turfgrasses. Research could rely on 
    reanalysis of published information and/or laboratory/filed studies.
    --The potential for recombination between plant viruses and plant-
    encoded nocapsid viral genes (e.g. replicase), especially for those 
    viruses in supergroup B (carmovirus, tombusvirus, luteovirus, 
    sobemovirus). Such studies should identify recombination potentials 
    and, if demonstrated, define frequencies and effect on symptom 
    expression.
    --The potential for plants to express nonviral genes using noncoding 
    regulatory sequences (promoters, translational enhancers, termination 
    sequences) derived from plant viruses that naturally infect the plants 
    (e.g. cauliflower mosaic virus and Brassica supp.). The potential for 
    changes in expression of introduced genes or other aspects of host 
    physiology when the transgenic plant becomes infected with plant 
    viruses, especially those from which the noncoding sequence was derived 
    or related viruses.
    --Changes in viral host ranges or the types of insects which can serve 
    as viral vectors due to the use of transgenic plants expressing viral 
    genes.
    --The potential for nontarget effects of plant-defense compounds 
    expressed in genetically modified plant-associated microorganisms 
    (e.g., compounds in phyllosphere or rhizosphere-inhabiting bacteria) or 
    in plants (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis delta endotoxin), especially in 
    regard to persistence of the organisms and material in the environment.
    --Identification of the minimal gene sequence(s) in an animal pathogen 
    which could confer pathogencity on a nonpathogenic organism. Pathogenic 
    organisms specially identified by the Animal and Plant Health 
    Inspection Service as being of interest are Marek's disease virus, 
    laryngo tracheitis virus, bovine leukemia virus, eastern equine 
    encephalomyelitis virus, bovine diarrhea virus, Erysipelothrix 
    rhusiopathiae and Haemophilus somnus.
    
        Note: Individual investigators whose research projects are 
    funded under the Program will be required to attend and present data 
    on results of their research at an Annual Conference. Attendance 
    costs at such a conference do not need to be included in the budgets 
    of proposed research projects; such costs will be borne from funds 
    previously awarded under the Program as part of a conference grant. 
    Additionally, a final project report on research results will be 
    required in a fixed protocol, electronic format, suitable for 
    distribution by USDA on CD-ROM.
    
    Applicable Regulations
    
        This Program is subject to the administrative provisions found in 7 
    CFR part 3415 (58 FR 65646, December 15, 1993), which set forth 
    procedures to be followed when submitting grant proposals, rules 
    governing the evaluation of proposals, the awarding of grants, and 
    post-award administration of such grants. Several other Federal 
    statutes and regulations apply to grant proposals considered for review 
    or to grants awarded under this Program. These include, but are not 
    limited to:
    
    7 CFR Part 1.1--USDA implementation of the Freedom of Information Act;
    7 CFR Part 1c--USDA implementation of the Federal Policy for the 
    Protection of Human Subjects;
    7 CFR Part 3--USDA implementation of OMB Circular A-129 regarding debt 
    collection;
    7 CFR Part 15--Subpart A--USDA implementation of Title VI of the Civil 
    Rights Act of 1964;
    7 CFR Part 520--ARS implementation of the National Environmental Policy 
    Act;
    7 CFR Part 3015--USDA Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations, 
    implementing OMB directives (i.e., Circular Nos. A-110, A-21, and A-
    122), and incorporating provisions of 31 U.S.C. 6301-6308 (formerly, 
    the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95-
    224), as well as general policy requirements applicable to recipients 
    of Departmental financial assistance;
    7 CFR Part 3016--USDA Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants 
    and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments;
    7 CFR Part 3017 as amended--USDA implementation of Governmentwide 
    Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide 
    Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants);
    7 CFR Part 3018--USDA implementation of New Restrictions on Lobbying. 
    Imposes new prohibitions and requirements for disclosure and 
    certification related to lobbying on recipients of Federal contracts, 
    grants, cooperative agreements, and loans;
    7 CFR Part 3051--Audits of Institutions of Higher Education and Other 
    Nonprofit Institutions;
    7 CFR Part 3407--CSRS implementation of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act;
    29 U.S.C. 794, section 504--Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and 7 CFR part 
    15B (USDA implementation of the statute), prohibiting discrimination 
    based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs;
    35 U.S.C. 200 et seq.--Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of rights 
    to inventions made by employees of small business firms and domestic 
    nonprofit organizations, including universities, in Federally assisted 
    programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR part 401).
    
    Programmatic Contact
    
        For additional information on the Program, please contact:
    
    Dr. David MacKenzie or Dr. Ann Lichens-Park, Cooperative State Research 
    Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ag Box 2220, Washington, DC 
    20250-2220, Telephone: (202) 401-4892
    
          or
    
    Dr. Robert Faust, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of 
    Agriculture, room 336, Building 005, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705, 
    Telephone: (301) 504-5059.
    
    How To Obtain Application Materials
    
        Copies of this solicitation, the administrative provisions for the 
    Program (7 CFR part 3415), and the Application Kit will be made 
    available upon request. The Application Kit contains required forms, 
    certifications, and instructions for preparing and submitting grant 
    applications. The administrative provisions include guidelines for 
    proposal format. Copies of this solicitation, the administrative 
    provisions, and the Application Kit may be obtained by contacting: 
    Proposal Services Branch, Awards Management Division, Cooperative State 
    Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ag Box 2245, 
    Washington, DC 20250-2245, Telephone Number: (202) 401-5048
        Application materials may also be requested via Internet by sending 
    a message with your name, mailing address (not e-mail) and telephone 
    number to psb@csrs.esusda.gov which states that you wish to receive a 
    copy of the application materials for the Fiscal Year 1994 
    Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program. The materials 
    will then be mailed to you (not e-mailed) as quickly as possible.
    
    Proposal Format
    
        The format guidelines for full research proposals, found in the 
    administrative provisions for the Program at s3415.4(d), should be 
    followed for the preparation of proposals under the Program in fiscal 
    year 1994 (Note that the Department elects not to solicit preproposals 
    nor conference grant proposals in fiscal year 1994).
    
    Compliance With the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
    
        As outlined in 7 CFR part 3407 and 7 CFR part 520 (the CSRS and ARS 
    regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 
    1969), environmental data for any proposed project is to be provided to 
    CSRS and ARS so that CSRS and ARS may determine whether any further 
    action is needed. The applicant shall review the following categorical 
    exclusions and determine if the proposed project may fall within one of 
    the categories.
    
    (1) Department of Agriculture Categorical Exclusions (7 CFR 1b.3)
    
        (i) Policy development, planning and implementation which are 
    related to routine activities such as personnel, organizational 
    changes, or similar administrative functions;
        (ii) Activities which deal solely with the funding of programs, 
    such as program budget proposals, disbursements, and transfer or 
    reprogramming of funds;
        (iii) Inventories, research activities, and studies, such as 
    resource inventories and routine data collection when such actions are 
    clearly limited in context and intensity;
        (iv) Educational and informational programs and activities;
        (v) Civil and criminal law enforcement and investigative 
    activities;
        (vi) Activities which are advisory and consultative to other 
    agencies and public and private entities; and
        (vii) Activities related to trade representation and market 
    development activities abroad.
    
    (2) CSRS and ARS Categorical Exclusions (7 CFR 3407.6 and 7 CFR 520.5)
    
        Based on previous experience, the following categories of CSRS and 
    ARS actions are excluded because they have been found to have limited 
    scope and intensity and to have no significant individual or cumulative 
    impacts on the quality of the human environment:
        (i) The following categories of research programs or projects of 
    limited size and magnitude or with only short-term effects on the 
    environment:
        (A) Research conducted within any laboratory, greenhouse, or other 
    contained facility where research practices and safeguards prevent 
    environmental impacts;
        (B) Surveys, inventories, and similar studies that have limited 
    context and minimal intensity in terms of changes in the environment; 
    and
        (C) Testing outside of the laboratory, such as in small isolated 
    field plots, which involves the routine use of familiar chemicals or 
    biological materials.
        (ii) Routine renovation, rehabilitation, or revitalization of 
    physical facilities, including the acquisition and installation of 
    equipment, where such activity is limited in scope and intensity.
        In order for CSRS and ARS to determine whether any further action 
    is needed with respect to NEPA, pertinent information regarding the 
    possible environmental impacts of a particular project is necessary; 
    therefore, a separate statement must be included in the proposal 
    indicating whether the applicant is of the opinion that the project 
    falls within a categorical exclusion and the reasons therefor. If it is 
    the applicant's opinion that the project proposed falls within the 
    categorical exclusions, the specific exclusions must be identified. The 
    information submitted shall be identified as ``NEPA Considerations'' 
    and the narrative statement shall be placed after the coversheet of the 
    proposal.
        Even though a project may fall within the categorical exclusions, 
    CSRS and ARS may determine that an Environmental Assessment or an 
    Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for an activity, if 
    substantial controversy on environmental grounds exist or if other 
    extraordinary conditions or circumstances are present which may cause 
    such activity to have a significant environmental effect.
    
    Proposal Submission
    
    What to Submit
    
        An original and 14 copies of a proposal must be submitted. Each 
    copy of each proposal must be stapled securely in the upper lefthand 
    corner (Do not bind). All copies of the proposal must be submitted in 
    one package.
    
    Where and When to Submit
    
        Proposals submitted through the regular mail must be received by 
    March 22, 1994, and must be sent to the following address: Proposal 
    Services Branch, Awards Management Division, Cooperative State Research 
    Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ag Box 2245, Washington, DC 
    20250-2245, Telephone: (202) 401-5048.
        Hand-delivered proposals must be submitted by close of business on 
    March 22, 1994, to an express mail or courier service or brought to the 
    following address (note that the zip code differs from that shown 
    above): Proposal Services Branch, Awards Management Division, 
    Cooperative State Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 
    room 303, Aerospace Center, 901 D Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024, 
    Telephone: (202) 401-5048.
    
    Supplementary Information
    
        The Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program is listed 
    in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under No. 10.219. For 
    reasons set forth in the final rule-related Notice to 7 CFR part 3015, 
    subpart V (48 FR 291115, June 24, 1983), this Program is excluded from 
    the scope of Executive Order No. 12372 which requires intergovernmental 
    consultation with State and local officials.
        Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
    U.S.C. 3504(h)), the collection of information requirements contained 
    in this Notice have been approved under OMB Document No. 0524-0022.
    
        Done at Washington, DC, on this 10th day of January, 1994.
    John Patrick Jordan,
    Administrator, Cooperative State Research Service.
    Essex E. Finney, Jr.,
    Acting Administrator, Agricultural Research Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-1729 Filed 1-26-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-22-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/27/1994
Department:
Agricultural Research Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-1729
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 27, 1994