98-1888. Certification of Speed Limit Enforcement  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 3811-3812]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-1888]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Highway Administration
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    23 CFR Part 1260
    
    [NHTSA-97-3196]
    RIN 2125-AE17
    
    
    Certification of Speed Limit Enforcement
    
    AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and National Highway 
    Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Section 205(d) of the National Highway System Designation Act 
    of 1995 repealed the National Maximum Speed Limit (NMSL) Compliance 
    Program. It made the repeal effective on December 8, 1995, but provided 
    that the Governors of certain States could delay the effective date of 
    the repeal. All possible delay periods have now passed. This Final Rule 
    provides that 23 CFR part 1260, which contains the procedures for 
    implementing the NMSL, is now rescinded.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 27, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: In FHWA, Janet Coleman, Office of 
    Highway Safety, 202-366-4668; or Raymond W. Cuprill, Office of the 
    Chief Counsel, 202-366-1377. In NHTSA, Garrett Morford, Police Traffic 
    Services Division, 202-366-9790; or Heidi L. Coleman, Office of the 
    Chief Counsel, 202-366-1834.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The 55 mph National Maximum Speed Limit (NMSL) was first instituted 
    in 1974 as a temporary conservation measure in response to the oil 
    embargo imposed by certain oil-producing nations. Because of the 
    reduction in traffic fatalities that accompanied the institution of the 
    speed limit, it was made permanent in 1975.
        In 1978, Congress amended the law to require that, in addition to 
    posting and enforcing the speed limit, States would have to achieve 
    specific levels of compliance. In April 1987, Congress passed 
    legislation that allowed States to post 65 mph maximum speed limits on 
    rural Interstate highways. In December 1987, the President approved 
    legislation enacting a limited demonstration program, that allowed the 
    posting of speed limits as high as 65 mph on certain rural non-
    Interstate highways through the end of FY 1991.
        The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
    (ISTEA) made the demonstration program permanent, and allowed other 
    rural non-Interstate highways that were not a part of the demonstration 
    program to be posted at the 65 mph speed limit, provided they met 
    certain criteria.
        ISTEA also required the Secretary of Transportation to publish a 
    rule to establish speed limit compliance requirements on 65 mph roads, 
    in addition to 55 mph roads, and to include a formula for determining 
    compliance by the States.
        FHWA and NHTSA had shared responsibility for the implementation of 
    the NMSL compliance program since 1980. To implement this program and 
    the requirements of ISTEA, the agencies promulgated a joint regulation, 
    23 CFR part 1260.
        On November 28, 1995, the President signed into law the National 
    Highway System Designation Act of 1995 (NHS Act). Section 205(d) of the 
    NHS Act repealed the NMSL compliance program, as set forth in 23 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 141(a) and 154.
        The NHS Act made the repeal effective on December 8, 1995, but 
    provided some States with an option to delay this effective date. In 
    any State in which the legislature was not in session on November 28, 
    1995, the Governor could declare, before December 8, 1995, that the 
    legislature was not in session and that the State preferred to delay 
    the effective date until after the State's legislature next convenes. 
    In accordance with the NHS Act, such a declaration would delay the 
    effective date of the repeal of the NMSL until the 60th day following 
    the date on which the legislature next convenes. Five States decided to 
    exercise the option: Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Ohio.
        Accordingly, as provided in the NHS, on December 8, 1995, the NMSL 
    was repealed for all States other than these five States. In those five 
    States, it remained in effect until the 60th day following the date on 
    which the legislature of that State next convened.
        The agencies published a final rule in the Federal Register on 
    March 20, 1996, 61 FR 11305, which rescinded the regulation for all 
    States except the five which had delayed the effective date until after 
    their legislatures next convened. That final rule added an 
    applicability section to Part 1260 (section 1260.4), making the 
    regulation applicable only to those five States. In addition, sections 
    of the regulation that pertained to speed monitoring, certification 
    requirements and compliance standards were deleted from the regulation 
    because they were no longer applicable to any State. This removed the 
    information collection requirement for all States at that time.
        The expiration of the 60-day period has now occurred for all 
    States. Since Part 1260 no longer applies to any State, the regulation 
    is being rescinded in its entirety.
    
    Regulatory Analyses and Notices
    
    Civil Justice Reform
    
        This final rule will not have any preemptive or retroactive effect. 
    It imposes no requirements on the States, but rather removes regulatory 
    obligations that are no longer authorized by statute.
    
    Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures
    
        The agencies have analyzed the effect of this action and determined 
    that it is not significant within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 
    or of Department of Transportation regulatory policies and procedures. 
    This final rule imposes no additional burden on the public. Regulatory 
    obligations have been removed since they are no longer authorized by 
    statute. Therefore, a regulatory evaluation is not required and was not 
    prepared.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the agencies 
    have evaluated the effects of this action on
    
    [[Page 3812]]
    
    small entities. Based on the evaluation, we certify that this action 
    will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. Accordingly, the preparation of a Regulatory 
    Flexibility Analysis is unnecessary.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had approved the 
    information collection requirements associated with 23 CFR part 1260 
    (OMB Clearance No. 2125-0027). By rescinding all of part 1260, the 
    information collection requirement, as that term is defined by OMB in 5 
    CFR part 1320, remains at zero.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        The agencies have analyzed this action for the purpose of 
    compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and have 
    determined that it will not have a significant effect on the human 
    environment.
    
    Executive Order 12612 (Federalism)
    
        This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612. There are no federalism 
    implications pursuant to Executive Order 12612 since regulatory 
    obligations are being rescinded because they are no longer authorized 
    under current law. Under these circumstances, the preparation of a 
    Federalism Assessment is not warranted.
    
    Notice and Comment
    
        The agencies find that prior notice and opportunity for comment are 
    unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) because the agencies are not 
    exercising discretion in a way that could be meaningfully affected by 
    public comment. Instead, this rescission of the agencies' speed limit 
    compliance regulations is mandated by Section 205(d) of the NHS Act. 
    Therefore, notice and opportunity for comment are not required under 
    the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of 
    Transportation.
        In addition, good cause exists to dispense with the 30-day delayed 
    effective date requirement of 5 U.S.C. 553(d) because this final rule 
    ``grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction'' in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1). In repealing the NMSL regulation 
    for all States, all Federal speed limit provisions are terminated. 
    Consequently, the agencies are proceeding directly to a final rule 
    which is effective upon its date of publication.
    
    List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 1260
    
        Grant programs--transportation, Highway and roads, Motor vehicles, 
    Traffic regulations.
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, Part 1260 of Title 23, Code of 
    Federal Regulations, is removed.
    
        Issued on: January 12, 1998.
    Kenneth R. Wykle,
    Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
    
    Ricardo Martinez,
    Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-1888 Filed 1-26-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/27/1998
Published:
01/27/1998
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-1888
Dates:
January 27, 1998.
Pages:
3811-3812 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
NHTSA-97-3196
RINs:
2125-AE17: Certification of Speed Limit Enforcement
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2125-AE17/certification-of-speed-limit-enforcement
PDF File:
98-1888.pdf
CFR: (1)
23 CFR 1260