94-1838. Restricted Area, Pacific Ocean Offshore of Camp Pendleton, San Diego County, CA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 19 (Friday, January 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-1838]
    
    
    [Federal Register: January 28, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part V
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Defense
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Department of the Army
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Corps of Engineers
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    33 CFR Part 334
    
    
    
    Restricted Area, Pacific Ocean Offshore of Camp Pendleton, CA; Rule
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Department of the Army
    Corps of Engineers
    
    33 CFR Part 334
    
    
    Restricted Area, Pacific Ocean Offshore of Camp Pendleton, San 
    Diego County, CA
    
    AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final, the Corps regulations contained in 
    33 CFR 334.905 Pacific Ocean, offshore of Camp Pendleton, California, 
    Fallbrook restricted area, which were published in the Federal Register 
    as an interim final rule on October 15, 1993.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 15, 1993.
    
    ADDRESSES: HQUSACE, CECW-OR, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Ms. Elizabeth White at (619) 455-9422 or Mr. Ralph Eppard at (202) 272-
    1783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commanding Officer of the Naval Weapons 
    Station requested the Corps to establish a restricted anchorage area 
    (identified as Fallbrook), offshore of Camp Pendleton, San Diego 
    County, California. In accordance with Naval Sea Systems Command, OPS 
    Volume 1 Manual, Ammunition and Explosives Ashore Safety Regulations 
    for Handling, Storing, Production, Renovation, and Shipping, a safety 
    distance of 9,000 feet to inhabited structures is required for the 
    anticipated net explosive weight of 5,500,000 pounds. During loading/
    unloading, vessel traffic and anchorage would be restricted to a 
    distance not closer than 5,400 feet from the vessel. The Fallbrook 
    anchorage site has been intermittently utilized in the past and its use 
    needs to be continued in support of replenishment operations associated 
    with the transfer of ordnance from the Fallbrook Annex to and from 
    naval combatants and ammunition ships. The Navy's utilization of this 
    anchorage is expected to grow to a maximum of 10 days per month. This 
    planned long-term utilization for replenishment operations necessitates 
    establishment of the restricted anchorage. The Corps Los Angeles 
    District Engineer issued a public notice on June 2, 1993, which 
    solicited comments on this proposed restricted area to all known 
    interested parties. The District did not receive any objections to the 
    establishment of the restricted anchorage area. There also were no 
    comments received in response to the interim final rule and 
    accordingly, the rule is adopted without change.
    
    Economic Assessment and Certification
    
        This final rule is issued with respect to a military function of 
    the Defense Department and the provisions of E.O. 12866 do not apply. 
    These rules have been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354), which requires the preparation of a regulatory 
    flexibility analysis for any regulation that will have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small businesses (i.e., 
    small businesses and small government) jurisdictions. There is no 
    anticipated navigational hazard or interference with existing waterway 
    traffic. There are no recreational or commercial fishery operations 
    presently in or using the waters within this area because of ongoing 
    military operations. Therefore, no loss of resources or use of 
    resources would be borne by the public. Therefore, it has been 
    determined that this rule will not have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities and that preparation of a 
    regulatory flexibility analysis is not warranted.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
    
        Danger zones, Navigation (water), Transportation.
        In consideration of the above, the Corps is amending part 334 of 
    title 33 to read as follows:
    
    PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 334 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 40 Stat. 266; (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892; (33 
    U.S.C. 3)
    
        2. Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 33 CFR part 334 
    which was published at 58 FR 53426 on October 15, 1993, is adopted as a 
    final rule without change.
    
        Dated: January 14, 1994.
    Stanley G. Genega,
    Major General, USA, Director of Civil Works.
    [FR Doc. 94-1838 Filed 1-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/28/1994
Department:
Engineers Corps
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-1838
Dates:
October 15, 1993.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 28, 1994
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 334