97-1441. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 and Model A310 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 3991-3993]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-1441]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-46-AD; Amendment 39-9892; AD 97-02-07]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 and Model A310 
    Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to Airbus Model A300-600 and Model A310 series airplanes, 
    that requires testing to verify if the smoke detection system can 
    detect smoke within 60 seconds; and cleaning the installation and duct, 
    if necessary. It also requires operators to submit a report of the test 
    findings to the manufacturer. This amendment is prompted by a report 
    that, during testing of the smoke detection system on in-service 
    airplanes, the system failed to detect smoke within 60 seconds due to 
    dust accumulation in the extraction ducts. The actions specified by 
    this AD are intended to ensure that dust accumulation does not reduce 
    the effectiveness of the smoke detection system and, consequently, lead 
    to undetected smoke or fire in the lavatory of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective March 4, 1997.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of March 4, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Huber, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2589; fax (206) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to Airbus Model A300-600 and Model 
    A310 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on July 30, 
    1996 (61 FR 39604). That action proposed to require performing an 
    operational and functional test to verify if the smoke detection system 
    can detect smoke within 60 seconds, and cleaning the installation and 
    duct, if necessary. That action also proposed to require submitting a 
    report of the test results to Airbus.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for the Proposal
    
        One commenter supports the proposed rule.
    
    Request to Revise Reporting Deadline
    
        One commenter requests that the proposal be revised to extend the 
    compliance time for submitting test reports from 10 days after 
    accomplishing the test, as proposed, to 30 days. The commenter 
    considers the longer time necessary in order to prepare an adequate 
    report of the required data.
        The FAA concurs and has revised paragraph (b) of this final rule 
    accordingly.
    
    Request to Withdraw Reporting Requirement
    
        One commenter requests that the FAA withdraw the proposed 
    requirement to submit a report of test results to Airbus. This 
    commenter previously completed the operational and functional tests on 
    its fleet of airplanes, but did not submit a report, since such a 
    provision was not part of the referenced Airbus All Operators Telex 
    (AOT) 26-16, dated September 12, 1995. Consequently, this commenter 
    does not want to be required to repeat the test simply in order to 
    prepare a report in accordance with the reporting requirement of the 
    proposed rule.
        Another commenter considers that reporting requirements, in 
    general, should be required by AD action only in cases where the AD is 
    viewed as ``interim action'' and that, based upon reviewing further 
    data, additional
    
    [[Page 3992]]
    
    rulemaking may be required. Since the referenced Airbus AOT was issued 
    more than a year ago, the commenter considers that sufficient time has 
    elapsed in which Airbus could collect the data needed to determine what 
    further action, if any, is needed. The commenter asserts that the FAA 
    should not impose a reporting requirement without first determining 
    with Airbus whether the test data is actually necessary.
        The FAA does not concur with the commenters' request to withdraw 
    the reporting requirement. As was explained in the preamble to the 
    notice, the intent of the reports is to enable Airbus to obtain enough 
    information to enable it to develop an appropriate repetitive testing 
    interval based on findings in the in-service fleet. The FAA has 
    contacted Airbus in order to determine if test results from U.S. 
    operators are still required; Airbus has responded by stating that the 
    data from the U.S. operators are still needed to establish the proper 
    testing intervals. In light of this, the FAA finds reason to retain the 
    reporting requirement in this final rule.
        However, in consideration of operators who already have 
    accomplished the operational and functional test prior to the issuance 
    of this AD, the FAA has revised paragraph (b) of the final rule to 
    indicate that, for those operators, the report is to be submitted 
    within 30 days after the effective date of the AD. As provided by the 
    compliance provision of this AD, which states ``* * * Compliance 
    required unless accomplished previously,'' those operators do not have 
    to repeat the one-time operational and functional test, required by 
    paragraph (a) of the AD, merely in order to submit the report.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 67 Airbus Model A300-600 and Model A310 
    series airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it 
    will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the 
    required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $4,020, or $60 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    97-02-07 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-9892. Docket 96-NM-46-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model A300-600 and Model A310 series airplanes, 
    on which Airbus Modification 10156 has not been installed; 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To ensure that dust accumulation in the ducts does not reduce 
    the effectiveness of the smoke detection system to detect smoke and, 
    consequently, lead to undetected smoke or fire in the lavatory of 
    the airplane; accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, 
    perform an operational and functional test to verify if the smoke 
    detection system can detect smoke within 60 seconds, in accordance 
    with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) 26-16, dated September 12, 
    1995.
        (1) If smoke is detected within 60 seconds, no further action is 
    required by this AD.
        (2) If smoke is not detected within 60 seconds, prior to further 
    flight, clean the installation/duct in accordance with the AOT. 
    Prior to further flight after accomplishment of the cleaning, repeat 
    the operational and functional test required by paragraph (a) of 
    this AD.
        (b) At the applicable time specified in either paragraph (b)(1) 
    or (b)(2) of this AD, submit a report of the test results (both 
    positive and negative findings) to Airbus Industrie Customer 
    Services, Attention Engineering Support, AI/SE-E23, 1 Rond Point 
    Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Information 
    collection requirements contained in this regulation have been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
    provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
        (1) For airplanes on which the test is accomplished after the 
    effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after 
    performing the test required by paragraph (a) of this AD.
        (2) For airplanes on which the test has been accomplished prior 
    to the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days 
    after the effective date of this AD.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
    
    [[Page 3993]]
    
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) The operational and functional test shall be done in 
    accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex (AOT) 26-16, dated 
    September 12, 1995. This incorporation by reference was approved by 
    the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 
    552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus 
    Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, 
    France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on March 4, 1997.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 14, 1997.
    S.R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-1441 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/4/1997
Published:
01/28/1997
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-1441
Dates:
Effective March 4, 1997.
Pages:
3991-3993 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-46-AD, Amendment 39-9892, AD 97-02-07
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-1441.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13