97-2076. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Approval of a NOINFX RACT Determination for International Paper CompanyHammermill Papers DivisionLockhaven  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 4167-4169]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-2076]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [PA 055-4038; FRL-5653-7]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    Pennsylvania; Approval of a NOX RACT Determination for 
    International Paper Company--Hammermill Papers Division--Lockhaven
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
    submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This revision 
    establishes and requires reasonably available control technology (RACT) 
    on International Paper Company--Hammermill Papers Division, a major 
    source of nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions. Additionally, it limits 
    the volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions at this facility to no 
    more than 50 tons per year; thereby making this facility a synthetic 
    minor VOC source. The intended effect of this action is to approve a 
    source-specific operating permit for the emission units at 
    International Paper--Hammermill Division--Lockhaven, located in Clinton 
    County, Pennsylvania. This action is being taken under section 110 of 
    the Clean Air Act.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on February 28, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
    available for public inspection during normal business hours at the 
    Air, Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
    19107; the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 
    20460; and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau 
    of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, 
    Pennsylvania 17105.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia H. Stahl, (215) 566-2180, at 
    the EPA Region III office or via e-mail at 
    stahl.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 9, 1996 (61 FR 15709), EPA 
    published a direct final rulemaking notice and the accompanying notice 
    of proposed rulemaking (NPR) (61 FR 15744) for the Commonwealth of 
    Pennsylvania pertaining to the VOC and NOX RACT determinations for 
    21 sources. One of these sources was International Paper Company--
    Hammermill Papers Division--Lockhaven (IP--Lockhaven), located in 
    Clinton County, Pennsylvania. On June 28, 1996, adverse comments were 
    submitted to EPA by the New York Department of Environmental 
    Conservation (NYDEC) pertaining to the RACT determination for IP--
    Lockhaven. The formal SIP revision for IP--Lockhaven was submitted by 
    Pennsylvania on April 19, 1995. Pennsylvania Department of 
    Environmental Protection (PADEP) also submitted comments to EPA on the 
    IP--Lockhaven RACT determination.
    
    NYDEC Comments
    
        New York Department of Environmental Conservation commented that 
    while they agreed with EPA's determination that RACT for the two 350 
    mmBTU/hr coal-fired stoker boilers was the operation and maintenance of 
    the boilers in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and good 
    air pollution control practices, they disagreed with the accompanying 
    emission limit of 0.7 lbs NOX/mmBTU, averaged over a 30 day 
    period, that was also determined to be RACT for these boilers. NYDEC 
    stated that since the AP-42 emission factor estimates NOX 
    emissions for this type of unit at 0.56 lbs/mmBTU, the limit of 0.7 
    lbs/mmBTU was too high. NYDEC concludes that in the absence of 
    supporting data, the AP-42 emission rate should become the SIP emission 
    rate for these boilers.
    
    Pennsylvania Comments
    
        Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection submitted 
    comments to EPA on July 16, 1996 stating that the proposed RACT 
    emission limits of 0.7 lbs NOX/mmBTU for the two boilers at IP--
    Lockhaven were established based on actual emissions data. The 30 day 
    average CEM data recorded for boiler #1 was 0.61 lbs/mmBTU with the 
    range as 0.52 to 0.67 lbs/mmBTU. The 30 day average CEM data recorded 
    for boiler #2 was 0.58 lbs/mmBTU with the range as 0.53 to 0.60 lbs/
    mmBTU. Since a year's worth of certified data was not available at the 
    time that DEP issued the permit to IP--Lockhaven (December 1995, OP 18-
    0005), DEP established the limit of 0.7 lbs/mmBTU to allow a buffer to 
    account for the limited emission data. DEP also states that condition 
    #6 of the IP permit allows the Department to revise the NOX 
    emission limits based on future CEM data. Furthermore, DEP states that 
    since the permit was issued, the IP boilers have recorded exceedances 
    and were
    
    [[Page 4168]]
    
    required to make adjustment to meet the 0.7 lbs/mmBTU permit limit; 
    indicating to DEP that the 0.7 lbs/mmBTU limit is appropriate for these 
    boilers.
    
    EPA Response to Comments
    
        The AP-42 emission factors are generally used where there is no 
    other available data. These factors come from the EPA document 
    ``Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors'' (AP-42) now in its 
    fifth edition (January 1995). These emission factors represent an 
    estimate of expected emissions and are compiled by EPA for a variety of 
    industrial sources and cover NOX as well as other pollutants. The 
    two boilers whose RACT determinations are at issue here are coal-fired 
    stoker boilers and the AP-42 emission factor is given as 13.7 lbs 
    NOX/ton of coal burned. In order to convert this emission factor 
    to units compatible with the proposed RACT emission limits (lbs 
    NOX/mmBTU), the heating value of the coal used needs to be known 
    or estimated. Generally the heating value of coal varies from 12,500 
    BTU to 13,500 BTU per ton of coal. Using the lower end of this range is 
    the more environmentally conservative part of this range, producing a 
    slightly higher estimate of emissions. The heating value of 12,500 BTU/
    ton coal is also more realistic for this part of the country. 
    Therefore, the conversion of the 13.7 lbs NOX/ton coal emission 
    factor is as follows:
    
    13.7 lbs NOX/ton coal  x  1 ton coal/2000 lbs  x  lb coal/12,500 
    BTU  x  106 = 0.55 lbs NOX/mmBTU
    
    This is approximately the 0.56 lbs NOX/mmBTU emission factor that 
    NYDEC cites as the AP-42 emission factor for the boilers at IP--
    Lockhaven.
        EPA believes that RACT for the two 350 mmBTU/hr stoker boilers at 
    IP--Lockhaven should not require the installation of add-on emission 
    controls. NYDEC agrees with this assessment. Consequently, the RACT 
    emission limit would reflect emissions achievable without controls. 
    International Paper--Lockhaven has been required to operate and 
    maintain continuous emission monitors (CEMs) to monitor NOX at 
    these two boilers since 1994. Using the CEM data available for these 
    boilers, beginning with the first quarter in 1994 through the second 
    quarter in 1996, the NOX emissions from boiler #1, on a quarterly 
    average, were 0.74 lbs/mmBTU, 0.66 lbs/mmBTU, 0.59 lbs/mmBTU, 0.61 lbs/
    mmBTU, 0.63 lbs/mmBTU, 0.64 lbs/mmBTU, 0.60 lbs/mmBTU, 0.54 lbs/mmBTU, 
    0.54 lbs/mmBTU, and 0.53 lbs/mmBTU. The NOX CEM data for boiler 
    #2, beginning with the first quarter in 1994 through the second quarter 
    in 1996, were 0.57 lbs/mmBTU, 0.58 lbs/mmBTU, 0.63 lbs/mmBTU, 0.66 lbs/
    mmBTU, 0.70 lbs/mmBTU, 0.72 lbs/mmBTU, 0.67 lbs/mmBTU, 0.60 lbs/mmBTU, 
    0.60 lbs/mmBTU, and 0.641 lbs/mmBTU. These data are quarterly averages. 
    CEM data for both running 30 day averages and daily averages are 
    available for each of the two IP boilers. The running 30 day averages 
    in the period first quarter 1994 through the second quarter 1996 range 
    from a low of 0.515 lbs/mmBTU to a high of 0.70 lbs/mmBTU for boiler #1 
    and from a low of 0.529 lbs/mmBTU to a high of 0.779 lbs/mmBTU for 
    boiler #2. The daily averages in the same period range from 0.32 lbs/
    mmBTU to 0.76 lbs/mmBTU for boiler #1 and from 0.47 lbs/mmBTU to 0.82 
    lbs/mmBTU for boiler #2. The longer the averaging period, the easier it 
    is to comply with the same numerical emission limit. For example, a 0.7 
    lbs/mmBTU limit on a quarterly average is a less stringent emission 
    limitation (easier for a source to comply with) than a 0.7 lbs/mmBTU 
    limit on a 30 day rolling average, which is less stringent than 
    complying with a 0.7 lbs/mmBTU limit on a daily average. The proposed 
    RACT emission limit for each of the two 350 mmBTU/hr boilers at IP--
    Lockhaven is 0.7 lbs NOX/mmBTU on a 30 day rolling average.
        EPA's concern with setting a RACT emission limitation for 
    International Paper is that the limitation should be stringent enough 
    to require that IP operate the boilers to minimize NOX emissions. 
    However, since RACT in this case has been determined to be no add-on 
    emission controls, the RACT emission limitation should not be so 
    stringent as to make it impossible for IP to meet the limit with its 
    current operation, provided it is operated in accordance with good air 
    pollution control practices. Therefore, after considering all the 
    submitted comments and the CEM data for the two 350 mmBTU/hr stoker 
    boilers, EPA believes that the emission limitation of 0.7 lbs NOX/
    mmBTU, together with the other conditions in the IP--Lockhaven 
    operating permit (OP 18-0005), constitute RACT for these emission 
    units.
        The IP--Lockhaven operating permit also contains a provision 
    applicable to the 165 mmBTU/hr boiler that requires it to have ceased 
    operations by May 31, 1995. EPA agrees that RACT for this boiler is its 
    shutdown by no later than May 31, 1995. Furthermore, the IP--Lockhaven 
    operating permit contains a provision that restricts its VOC emissions 
    to less than 50 tons per year so as to avoid the major source VOC RACT 
    requirement. A source may agree to federally enforceable requirements 
    to limit its potential emissions and become a synthetic minor source 
    for that pollutant. Additional information about the emission units and 
    RACT requirements at this facility is available in the technical 
    support document that was made available with the April 9, 1996 Federal 
    Register notice.
    
    Final Action
    
        EPA has considered the comments submitted by NYDEC and PADEP and 
    other relevant information and has decided to approve the operating 
    permit, OP 18-0005, for International Paper Company--Hammermill 
    Division--Lockhaven as RACT and incorporate it as a revision to the 
    Pennsylvania SIP. Pursuant to section 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the Clean 
    Air Act, EPA is determining that the requirements in OP 18-0005 
    constitute RACT for the applicable emission units at the IP--Lockhaven 
    facility.
        The Agency has reviewed this request for revision of the Federally-
    approved State implementation plan for conformance with the provisions 
    of the 1990 amendments enacted on November 15, 1990. The Agency has 
    determined that this action conforms with those requirements 
    irrespective of the fact that the submittal preceded the date of 
    enactment.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities
    
    [[Page 4169]]
    
    with jurisdiction over populations of less than 50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
    Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
    Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
    any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the 
    Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility 
    analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic 
    reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base 
    its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. 
    EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA must 
    select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that 
    achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory 
    requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for 
    informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly 
    or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that the approval action proposed/promulgated 
    does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs 
    of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments 
    in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action 
    approves pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and 
    imposes no new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs 
    to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, 
    result from this action.
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action pertaining to the NOX RACT approval 
    for International Paper Company--Hammermill Division--Lockhaven 
    (Clinton County) must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals 
    for the appropriate circuit by March 31, 1997. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen 
    dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: November 7, 1996.
    Stanley L. Laskowski,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
    
        Chapter I, title 40, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
    as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
    
        2. Section 52.2020 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(115) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.2020  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (115) Revisions to the Pennsylvania Regulations, Chapter 129.91 
    pertaining to VOC and NOX RACT, submitted on January 6, 1995 by 
    the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection:
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) One letter dated January 6, 1995 from the Pennsylvania 
    Department of Environmental Protection transmitting source specific VOC 
    and/or NOX RACT determinations in the form of plan approvals or 
    operating permits for International Paper Company--Hammermill Papers 
    Division--Lockhaven.
        (B) Operating permit (OP):
        (1) International Paper Company--Hammermill Papers Division--
    Lockhaven--OP 18-0005, effective December 27, 1994, except the 
    expiration date of the operating permit.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-2076 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/28/1997
Published:
01/29/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-2076
Dates:
This final rule is effective on February 28, 1997.
Pages:
4167-4169 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PA 055-4038, FRL-5653-7
PDF File:
97-2076.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.2020