97-2120. Environmental Impact Statement, Crystal Creek Timber Harvest on the Petersburg Ranger District, Stikine Area, Tongass National Forest, Petersburg, Alaska  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 4245-4246]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-2120]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Forest Service
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statement, Crystal Creek Timber Harvest on 
    the Petersburg Ranger District, Stikine Area, Tongass National Forest, 
    Petersburg, Alaska
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Stikine Area of the USDA Forest Service proposes to 
    harvest approximately 16 million board feet of timber in the Crystal 
    Creek project area, which is near Thomas Bay on the Southeast Alaska 
    mainland. A variety of harvest methods and silvicultural prescriptions 
    will be used. This project would include the necessary road 
    construction for transport of timber. The existing log transfer site 
    would be reconstructed at Thomas Bay.
        The purpose and need for this project is to make available for 
    harvest approximately 16 million board feet of timber. This will:
        1. Implement direction in the Tongass Land Management Plan,
        2. Contribute to providing a sustained volume of wood to meet local 
    and national demand, and
        3. Provide local and regional employment opportunities.
        There may also be opportunities to maintain or enhance forage for 
    moose habitat to sustain a huntable population in the area. Activities 
    such as commercial and pre-commercial thinning of second growth stands, 
    and geographically distributing timber harvest over time and habitat 
    will be considered toward achieving this goal.
        A variety of resources and values will be maintained through the 
    application of ecosystem management principles in the design of the 
    project.
        A range of alternatives will respond to environmental and social 
    issues. The no-action alternative will not harvest timber in the area. 
    The Thomas Bay log transfer facility will be reconstructed and required 
    roads will be constructed or reconstructed as needed.
        The decision to be made is:
        1. Whether or not timber harvest will occur in the Crystal Creek 
    project area;
        2. How much timber will be harvested;
        3. Location and design of harvest units;
        4. Location and design of road construction and reconstruction; and
        5. What mitigation measures and monitoring will be implemented.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be 
    available for public review by June, 1997. The final Environmental 
    Impact Statement is scheduled to be completed by November, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Questions, written comments, and suggestions 
    concerning the analysis should be sent to Bruce Sims, Team Leader, 
    Petersburg Ranger District, P.O. Box 1328, Petersburg, AK 99833, phone 
    (907) 772-3871, fax (907) 772-5995.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All appropriate agencies will be contacted 
    and all required permits will be received before the proposed action is 
    implemented. The following permits are anticipated in order to 
    implement the proposed action:
    
    [[Page 4246]]
    
         U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval under Section 404 of 
    the Clean Water Act,
         State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources tideland 
    permit and lease or easement, and
         State of Alaska, Department of Environmental Conservation 
    authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
    
    Public Comment
    
        Federal, State, and local agencies, potential contractors, and 
    other individuals or organizations who may be interested in, or 
    affected by, the decision are invited to participate in the scoping 
    process. This process will include:
        1. Identification of potential issues;
        2. Identification of issues to be analyzed in depth;
        3. Determination of potential cooperating agencies and assignment 
    of responsibility; and
        4. Examination of various alternatives.
        The Forest Supervisor will hold public meetings during the planning 
    process. Interested people are invited to comment. The comment period 
    on the Draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the Notice of 
    Availability appears in the Federal Register.
        The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
    to give reviewers notice of several draft environmental impact 
    statements must structure their participation in the environmental 
    review process. First, reviewers of the draft environmental impact 
    statements must structure their participation in the environmental 
    review of the proposal so it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the 
    reviewer's position and contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. 
    v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 533 [1978]). Also, environmental objections that 
    could have been raised at the Draft EIS stage may be waived if not 
    raised until after the completion of the final environmental impact 
    statement or dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
    1016, 1022 [9th Cir. 1986] and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. 
    Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 [E.D. Wis. 1980]). Because of these 
    court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this 
    proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period 
    so substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at the time when we can meaningfully consider them and respond 
    to them in the final environmental impact statement.
        To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
    and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft 
    environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is 
    helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft 
    environmental impact statement. Comments may also address the adequacy 
    of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the 
    alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may 
    wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for 
    implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environment 
    Policy Act in 40 CFR 1503.3 while addressing these points.
        The responsible official for the decision is Abigail R. Kimbell, 
    Forest Supervisor, Stikine Area, Tongass National Forest, Alaska 
    Region, Petersburg, Alaska.
    
        Dated: January 13, 1997.
    Abigail R. Kimbell,
    Forest Supervisor.
    [FR Doc. 97-2120 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/29/1997
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
Document Number:
97-2120
Dates:
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be available for public review by June, 1997. The final Environmental Impact Statement is scheduled to be completed by November, 1997.
Pages:
4245-4246 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-2120.pdf