97-2206. Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 4290-4291]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-2206]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    [File No. 932-3019]
    
    
    Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.; Analysis to Aid Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
    unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
    competition, this consent agreement, accepted subject to final 
    Commission approval, would require, among other things, Pre-Paid to pay 
    $165 to any consumer who purchased certain living trusts and who has 
    not already received a refund and does not live in a state with which 
    Pre-Paid has already settled. In addition, Pre-Paid, would be 
    prohibited from making misrepresentations about living trusts and would 
    be required to make certain disclosures with regard to legal challenges 
    that can be made against living trusts; the possibility of probate for 
    certain estates regardless of whether living trusts are used; and the 
    transfer of consumers' assets into the trusts. The agreement settles 
    allegations that the Pre-Paid made numerous false statements about the 
    benefits and appropriateness of living trusts, in general, and about 
    living trusts it sold, in particular.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 31, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 6th St. and Pa. Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Charter, Federal Trade 
    Commission, Denver Regional Office, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1523, 
    Denver, CO 80294. (303) 844-2272. Elizabeth Palmquist, Federal Trade 
    Commission, Denver Regional Office, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1523, 
    Denver, CO 80294. (303) 844-2272.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46, and Section 2.34 of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 2.34), notice is hereby 
    given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent 
    order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject 
    to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public 
    record for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid 
    Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
    allegations in the accompanying complaint. An electronic copy of the 
    full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the
    
    [[Page 4291]]
    
    Commission Actions section of the FTC Home Page (for January 16, 1997), 
    on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/actions/htm.'' A 
    paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room H-
    130, Sixth Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627. Public comment is 
    invited. Such comments or views will be considered by the Commission 
    and will be available for inspection and copying at its principal 
    office in accordance with Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's 
    Rules of Practice (16 CFR 4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
    Analysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
    
        The Federal Trade Commission has agreed to accept, subject to final 
    approval, a proposed consent order settling charges that Pre-Paid Legal 
    Services, Inc., violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.
        The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for 
    sixty (60) days for reception of comments by interested persons. 
    Comments received during this period will become part of the public 
    record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the 
    agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should 
    withdraw from the agreement or make final the agreement's proposed 
    order.
        This matter concerns the sale of living trusts to senior citizens 
    through membership in the American Association for Senior Citizens 
    (``AASC'). The respondent covered by the proposed order is Pre-Paid 
    Legal Services, Inc., the company responsible for furnishing to and 
    preparing the living trusts for AASC.
        The complaint alleges that the respondent violated Section 5 of the 
    Federal Trade Commission Act by making numerous misrepresentations 
    about the advantages of living trusts over other forms of estate 
    planning. Specifically, the complaint alleges that respondent has 
    misrepresented that (1) the use of a living trust avoids all 
    administrative costs; (2) at death, a living trust ensures that assets 
    are distributed immediately or almost immediately; (3) a living trust 
    cannot be challenged; (4) living trusts are prepared by local 
    attorneys; (5) a living trust protects against catastrophic medical 
    costs; (6) a living trust is the appropriate estate planning device for 
    every consumer; and (7) there are no disadvantages to a living trust.
        The proposed consent order contains provisions which are designed 
    to remedy the alleged violations and to prevent the respondent from 
    engaging in similar acts and practices in the future. The proposed 
    order would prohibit the respondent from making the misrepresentations 
    alleged in the complaint and set forth above. Additionally, the order 
    would require the respondent to disclose to prospective purchasers that 
    living trusts may be challenged on similar grounds as wills and that 
    they may not be appropriate in all instances.
        Under the order, the respondent also would be required to provide 
    four affirmative disclosures in situations where the statements would 
    be true. (1) Some states have created a mechanism for ``informal 
    probate'' of an estate if the estate meets certain criteria, which 
    significantly reduces the time involved in probate. This disclosure 
    would be required in states where informal probate is available. (2) If 
    the transfer of an individual's assets into the living trust is not 
    included in the price of creating the living trust, that fact must be 
    disclosed. (3) If it is the sole responsibility of the purchaser of the 
    living trust to transfer assets into the trust, that fact must be 
    disclosed. (4) In some states, but not in others, creditors have a 
    longer period of time to file claims against a living trust than 
    against a probated estate. This fact would have to be disclosed in such 
    states.
        The proposed order would require the respondent to distribute the 
    proposed order to its officers, agents, and all personnel who 
    participate in any way with respondent's sales activities relating to 
    living trusts. Additionally, the order would require the respondent to 
    notify the Commission of any changes in its corporate structure and to 
    retain for three years all materials that it relies upon in making 
    representations covered by the order. Finally, the respondent is 
    required to file one or more compliance reports detailing its 
    compliance with the order.
        The proposed order also requires the respondent to offer partial 
    refunds to any AASC member who has not previously received a refund 
    from either the respondent or AASC.
        The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
    proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official 
    interpretation of the agreement and proposed order, nor to modify in 
    any way their terms. The proposed consent order has been entered into 
    for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by 
    the respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in the 
    complaint.
    Donald S. Clark,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-2206 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/29/1997
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed Consent Agreement.
Document Number:
97-2206
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before March 31, 1997.
Pages:
4290-4291 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 932-3019
PDF File:
97-2206.pdf