[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4211-4213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2221]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-NM-42-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all Airbus Model A300-600 series
airplanes. This proposal would require inspections of the lower door
surrounding structure to detect cracks and corrosion, and repair, if
necessary. This proposal also would require inspections to detect
cracking of the holes of the corner doublers, the fail-safe ring, and
the door frames of the door structures; and repair, if necessary. In
addition, this proposal would provide for optional terminating action
for certain inspections. This proposal is prompted by reports
indicating that corrosion was found behind the scuff plates at exit and
cargo doors, and fatigue cracks originated from certain fastener holes
located in adjacent structure. The actions specified by the proposed AD
are intended to detect and correct such corrosion and fatigue cracking,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the door
surroundings.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 10, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-42-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location
between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Huber, Aerospace Engineer,
Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206)
227-2589; fax (206) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 96-NM-42-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 96-NM-42-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France, has notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on all Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes. The
DGAC advises that it has received reports indicating that corrosion was
found behind the scuff plates at passenger/crew doors, emergency exits,
and the bulk cargo door. The DGAC also advises that results of
structural fatigue testing have revealed that cracks were found on the
corner doublers of the forward, mid, and aft passenger/crew door
frames; and, after various simulated flights, on the fail-safe ring and
frames 14 and 16A of the forward passenger/crew door. After 50,000
simulated flights, cracks measuring between 8.0 mm and 109.0 mm were
found on the forward door frames and fail-safe ring. On the mid door
frame, a 53.0 mm crack was found after 60,493 simulated flights. A
crack that measured 32.0 mm was found on the aft door frame after
106,000 simulated flights. In all cases, the cracks originated at the
fastener holes. In addition, cracks originating from corner doubler
edges were found at the aft passenger/crew doors.
Such corrosion and fatigue cracking, if not detected and corrected,
could result in reduced structural integrity of the door surroundings.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-6011, Revision 3, dated
February 4, 1991, which describes procedures for a one-time inspection
to detect cracks and corrosion in the areas behind the scuff plates at
passenger/crew doors, emergency exits, and the bulk cargo door, and
repair, if necessary. Airbus also has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-
6022, dated February 4, 1991,
[[Page 4212]]
which describes procedures for corresponding repetitive inspections in
these areas, and repair, if necessary.
In addition, Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-6018,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1992. This service bulletin describes
procedures for repetitive inspections to detect cracking of the holes
of the corner doublers, the fail-safe ring, and the door frames at the
left- and right-hand forward, mid, and aft passenger/crew door
structures; and repair, if necessary.
Airbus also has issued Service Bulletin A300-53-6002, Revision 3,
dated February 22, 1992, which describes procedures for modification of
the passenger/crew door frames. This modification consists of
performing cold expansion procedures on the fastener holes in door
frames, corner doublers, and fail-safe rings; and installing oversized
Hi-Lok fasteners and additional steel doublers at door frame corners,
where necessary, to improve the fatigue life of the corner doublers,
fail-safe rings, and door frames. Accomplishment of the modification
eliminates the need for the repetitive inspections specified in Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-53-6018.
The DGAC classified the inspection service bulletins as mandatory
and issued French airworthiness directive 91-132-124(B), dated June 26,
1991, as amended by a Correction, dated August 21, 1991, in order to
assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France. (The
DGAC did not classify the modification service bulletin as mandatory.)
FAA's Conclusions
This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of
the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, the proposed AD would require inspections of the
lower door surrounding structure to detect cracks and corrosion, and
repair, if necessary. The proposed AD also would require inspections to
detect cracking of the holes of the corner doublers, the fail-safe
ring, and the door frames of the door structures; and repair, if
necessary. In addition, the proposed AD would provide for optional
terminating action for certain inspections. The actions would be
required to be accomplished in accordance with the service bulletins
described previously.
The FAA has considered the following criteria in allowing
repetitive inspections of the crack-prone area to be permitted to
continue indefinitely, even though a positive fix for the unsafe
condition exists: (1) the design of the airplane is damage tolerant;
and (2) the proposed interval of the repetitive inspections does not
require that numerous inspections will be accomplished over the life of
the airplane.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 35 airplanes of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 700 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed inspections (including
access and close-up), and that the average labor rate is $60 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,470,000, or $42,000 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if this AD were not adopted.
Should an operator elect to accomplish the optional terminating
action that would be provided by this AD action, it would take
approximately 147 work hours to accomplish it, at an average labor rate
of $60 per work hour. The cost of required parts would be approximately
$5,581 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
optional terminating action would be $14,401 per airplane.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ``ADDRESSES.''
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Airbus: Docket 96-NM-42-AD.
Applicability: All Model A300-600 series airplanes, certificated
in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (i) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously. To detect and correct corrosion behind the scuff plates
at exit and cargo doors, and fatigue cracking in certain fastener
holes located in adjacent structure, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the door surroundings, accomplish the
following:
[[Page 4213]]
(a) Perform an initial inspection of the areas behind the scuff
plates below the passenger/crew doors and bulk cargo door to detect
cracks and corrosion, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-53-6011, Revision 3, dated February 4, 1991; at the time
specified in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this AD. If any
crack or corrosion is found during this inspection, prior to further
flight, repair in accordance with the service bulletin.
Accomplishment of this inspection is not required for the mid and
aft passenger/crew doors if a steel doubler that covers the entire
inspection area is installed.
(1) For airplanes on which Modification 5382S6526 (for forward
doors) and Modification 5382D4741 (for all other doors) have been
accomplished prior to delivery of the airplane: Perform the initial
inspection within 9 years since manufacture, or within 1 year after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes on which Modification 5382S6526 (for forward
doors) and Modification 5382D4741 (for all other doors) have not
been accomplished; and on which the procedures described in Airbus
Service Information Letter (SIL) A300-53-033, Revision 2 (for all
doors), dated November 23, 1984, have been accomplished: Perform the
initial inspection within 5 years after accomplishment of the
procedures described in the SIL, or within 1 year after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(3) For airplanes on which Modification 5382S6526 (for forward
doors), Modification 5382D4741 (for all other doors), and the
procedures described in Airbus SIL A300-53-033, Revision 2, dated
November 23, 1984, have not been accomplished: Perform the initial
inspection within 4 years since manufacture, or within 1 year after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(b) Perform repetitive inspections of the areas behind the scuff
plates below the passenger/crew doors and bulk cargo door to detect
cracks and corrosion, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300-53-6022, dated February 4, 1991; at the applicable times
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD. Accomplishment
of these inspection is not required for the mid and aft passenger/
crew doors if a steel doubler that covers the entire inspection area
is installed.
(1) For the forward and mid passenger/crew doors, the bulk cargo
door, and the aft passenger/crew doors, except the upper and lower
edges of the fail-safe ring and the upper edges of the corner
doubler: Perform the first inspection within 5 years after
accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD;
and repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 5
years.
(2) For the upper and lower edges of the fail-safe ring and the
upper edges of the corner doubler of the aft passenger/crew doors:
Perform the first inspection within 5 years or 6,000 landings after
accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD,
whichever occurs first; and repeat the inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 5 years or 6,000 landings, whichever occurs
first.
(c) If cracks are found as a result of any inspection required
by paragraph (b) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6022, dated February
4, 1991. Thereafter, perform the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (b) of this AD at the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this AD.
(d) If corrosion is found as a result of any inspection required
by paragraph (b) of this AD, prior to further flight, repair in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6022, dated February
4, 1991. Thereafter, perform the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (b) of this AD at the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this AD.
(1) For the upper and lower edges of the fail-safe ring and the
upper edges of the corner doubler of the aft passenger/crew doors,
and for the mid passenger/crew door: Inspect at intervals not to
exceed 5 years or 5,000 landings, whichever occurs first.
(2) For the forward passenger/crew doors and bulk cargo doors:
Inspect at intervals not to exceed 5 years.
(e) Perform an inspection to detect cracking of the holes of the
corner doublers, the fail-safe ring, and the door frames of the
left- and right-hand forward, mid, and aft passenger/crew door
structures, in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6018,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1992, and at the applicable times
specified in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), or (e)(4) of this
AD.
(1) For the upper corners of the forward doors: Inspect prior to
the accumulation of 20,000 total landings, or within 2,000 landings
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For the lower corners of the forward doors: Inspect prior to
the accumulation of 20,000 total landings, or within 4,000 landings
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(3) For the upper and lower corners of the mid doors: Inspect
prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total landings, or within 2,000
landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
(4) For the upper and lower corners of the aft doors, and for
the parts underneath the corners of the upper door frames: Inspect
prior to the accumulation of 20,000 total landings, or within 4,000
landings after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
(f) Repeat the inspections required by paragraph (e) of this AD
at the applicable times specified in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2),
(f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5).
(1) For the upper corners of the forward doors: Inspect at
intervals not to exceed 6,000 landings.
(2) For the lower corners of the forward doors: Inspect at
intervals not to exceed 10,000 landings.
(3) For the upper and lower corners of the mid and aft doors on
which an inspection required by paragraph (e) of this AD was
accomplished using a Roto test technique: Inspect at intervals not
to exceed 8,000 landings.
(4) For the upper and lower corners of the mid and aft doors on
which an inspection required by paragraph (e) of this AD was
accomplished using an X-ray technique: Inspect at intervals not to
exceed 3,500 landings.
(5) For the areas around the fasteners in the vicinity of
stringer 12 on the upper door frames of the aft doors on which an
inspection required by paragraph (e) of this AD was accomplished
using a visual technique: Inspect at intervals not to exceed 6,900
landings.
(g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (e) or (f) of this AD: Prior to further flight, accomplish
the requirement of paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable.
(1) If any crack is found, and the crack can be eliminated using
the method specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6018,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1992: Prior to further flight, repair
the crack in accordance with that service bulletin.
(2) If any crack is found, and the crack cannot be eliminated
using the method specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6018,
Revision 1, dated April 29, 1992: Prior to further flight, repair
the crack in accordance with a method approved by the Manager,
Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate.
(h) Modification of the passenger/crew door frames in accordance
with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-6002, Revision 3, dated
February 22, 1992, constitutes terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (f) of this AD.
(i) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
(j) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 23, 1997.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2221 Filed 1-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
