99-2186. Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement III to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay Project, Dare County, North Carolina; Dated January 1999  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 19 (Friday, January 29, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 4640]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-2186]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Department of the Army
    
    Corps of Engineers
    
    
    Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement III to the Final 
    Environmental Impact Statement for the Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay Project, 
    Dare County, North Carolina; Dated January 1999
    
    AGENCY: Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, DOD.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has prepared Supplement No. 2 
    General Design Memorandum and a Draft Supplement III to the Final 
    Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay 
    project, located in Dare County, North Carolina. The project was 
    originally authorized in 1970, and called for the deepening of the 
    navigation channel from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet to 
    Wanchese, North Carolina. Because of the dynamic and hazardous nature 
    of Oregon Inlet, dual jetties, combined with a means to bypass sand 
    around the inlet, were authorized to provide safe navigation and reduce 
    the frequency of maintenance dredging.
        A range of jetty spacings was analyzed to determine the optimum for 
    protecting navigation, channeling tidal flows, preventing sound side 
    setup, and facilitating larval fish passage through the inlet. Based on 
    this analysis, a jetty spacing of 3,000 feet was selected. Three 
    alternative jetty designs were analyzed to determine whether cost 
    effective measures are available to minimize potential impacts on 
    larval fish: (a) The previously proposed project at a 3,000-foot 
    spacing; (b) jetties along the same alignment which are 1,000 feet 
    shorter; and (c) jetties which are 1,000 feet shorter along the same 
    alignment and with a weir section in the north jetty to allow larval 
    fish passage during mid to high tides. Refined modeling and offshore 
    surveys have indicated that shorter jetties will be effective at 
    intercepting littoral sands and capturing sediments in the ebb tide 
    delta, therefore, shorter jetties are being recommended. Analysis of 
    the weir jetty alternative indicates that movement of larval fishes 
    into the inlet would be facilitated by the presence of a weir. Initial 
    construction costs would be slightly lower and there would be 
    unquantifiable fishery benefits. A weir jetty would allow for the 
    movement of sand over the weir into the inlet where it could be readily 
    bypassed during any season instead of the summer season bypassing 
    required under the previously proposed plan. The dredging only plan has 
    also been reexamined. It has been confirmed that, due to high rate of 
    shoaling in Oregon Inlet, construction and maintenance of the 
    authorized improved channel without jetties is not economically 
    feasible. The no action alternative, which includes the continuation of 
    year-round sidecast dredging supplemented by pipeline and hopper 
    dredging in an effort to maintain the existing project, does not 
    provide a safe, navigable channel in Oregon Inlet. The hazardous 
    navigation conditions will continue to cause vessel losses and damages, 
    injuries to crews, and occasional deaths. After consideration of the 
    environmental consequences of the spacing changes and refinements to 
    the jetty alternative, the dredging only alternative, and the no action 
    alternative, the preferred alternative is to construct shortened 
    jetties with a 3,000-foot spacing and a weir section in the north 
    jetty.
        The Supplement No. 2 General Design Memorandum and Draft Supplement 
    III to the Final EIS are now being circulated to allow the public and 
    other interested parties to comment on this sand management plan and 
    other project features which have changed since the last EIS 
    supplement, dated May 1985. All interested persons are invited to 
    provide their views on any aspect of the proposed project.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the Supplement No. 
    2 General Design Memorandum contact Mr. William Dennis, U.S. Army Corps 
    of Engineers, Wilmington District, PO Box 1890, Wilmington, North 
    Carolina 28402-1890, at (910) 251-4780; and for information on the DEIS 
    supplement contact Mr. William Adams, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 
    Wilmington District, P.O. Box 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-
    1890, at (910) 251-4748.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Lands on either side of the inlet are in 
    public ownership, with Cape Hatteras National Seashore to the north and 
    Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge to the south. Without sand 
    bypassing, jetties, which trap sand as it moves along the beach, can 
    cause significant erosion of adjacent shorelines. During 1991, the U.S. 
    Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of the Interior formed a 
    Joint Task Force to develop a sand-bypassing plan that was agreeable to 
    both parties. The outcome of this effort was the development of a Sand 
    Management Plan which went beyond previous sand bypassing plans by 
    predefining project related shoreline impacts and delineating shoreline 
    reaches which will be managed as a project responsibility.
    
    SCOPING: Individuals and agencies may present written comments relevant 
    to the Draft EIS Supplement by sending the information to Mr. William 
    Adams at the address above prior to March 18, 1999. Comments, 
    suggestions, and requests to be placed on the mailing list for 
    announcements and for the Final EIS Supplement are also welcome and can 
    be furnished to Mr. Adams at the above address or via e-mail to: 
    william.f.adams@saw02.usace.army.mil, or by FAX at (910) 251-4965.
        Copies of the Draft EIS Supplement are available from Mr. William 
    Adams at the address above. Review copies are also available in the 
    library of the Wilmington District Headquarters located at 69 
    Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina.
    
        Dated: January 13, 1999.
    Terry R. Youngbluth,
    Colonel Corps of Engineers, District Engineer.
    [FR Doc. 99-2186 Filed 1-28-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-GN-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/29/1999
Department:
Engineers Corps
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability.
Document Number:
99-2186
Pages:
4640-4640 (1 pages)
PDF File:
99-2186.pdf