[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 93-32022]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: January 3, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. 79-17; Notice 39]
New Car Assessment Program; Consideration of a Public Meeting
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice requests comments on NHTSA's consideration of a
public meeting to review and discuss issues concerning, and options
for, the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) and on the agenda for the
meeting. In 1972, Congress enacted the ``Motor Vehicle Information and
Cost Savings Act'' which includes requirements for the development and
dissemination of comparative information on the crashworthiness of
motor vehicles. In 1978, NCAP with the primary purpose of partially
fulfilling this requirement. In NCAP frontal crash tests of
approximately 35 passenger vehicles are conducted each year and the
test results are made available to the public. To be responsive to
Congress and to further benefit the public, NHTSA is considering
convening a public meeting on the program to review the present NCAP
and to invite information that could improve the program.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be submitted no later than
March 4, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice must refer to the docket and notice
numbers set forth above and be submitted (preferably in 10 copies) to
the Docket Section, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
room 5109, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590. Submissions
containing information for which confidential treatment is requested
should be submitted (3 copies) to Chief Counsel, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, room 5219, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20590, and 7 copies from which the purportedly
confidential information has been deleted should be sent to the Docket
Section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jim Hackney, Office of Market Incentives, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590 (202-366-1740).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In December 1993, the agency submitted a
report to Congress on NCAP. This report can be found in this Docket and
is titled Response to the NCAP FY 1992 Congressional Requirements.
This report provides:
The results of an 18-month study to assess consumer and
media needs and preferences for better understanding and more effective
use of NCAP data. This included a summary of several consumer focus
group and media studies. These studies indicated that consumers and the
media desire comparative safety information on vehicles, a simplified
NCAP format to better understand and utilize the crash test results,
and expansion of NCAP to include other crash modes, such as side
crashes and rollovers. Plans for implementing the findings of these
studies are included in the report.
Studies of real-world crashes versus NCAP crash tests.
These studies tentatively conclude that NCAP test conditions
approximate real-world crash conditions covering a major segment of the
frontal crash safety problem. The studies also conclude that there is a
significant correlation between NCAP results and real-world fatality
risks for restrained drivers. In high speed frontal crashes, fatality
risks to restrained drivers of cars that perform well in NCAP may be as
much as 30 percent lower than fatality risks to restrained drivers of
cars that do not perform well in NCAP. A more detailed report on this
subject will soon be published for public comment.
A study on the efficacy of allowing manufacturers to
choose between the Hybrid III and the Hybrid II crash test dummy. NCAP
data were utilized in this study along with an analysis of comments to
Federal Register notices on the mandatory use of the Hybrid III crash
test dummy in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208 and
in NCAP. After considering data analysis and reviewing the comments to
the two notices, NHTSA has concluded that exclusive use of the Hybrid
III in NCAP should begin with MY 1996 vehicles. This is two years
earlier than required by the recent amendment to FMVSS No. 208.
Beginning with MY 1994 vehicles, the Hybrid III is being used
exclusively for all seating positions in which the occupant is
protected by an air bag.
The report also includes a review of NCAP historical performance
and the following future goals for NCAP.
Reach a larger group of the population with simplified
data that will assist consumers in their vehicles purchases.
Expand the collection of safety information by utilizing
the additional injury-measuring capabilities of the more advance Hybrid
III dummy.
Expand NCAP to provide comparative side impact information
to consumers along with the frontal NCAP information.
Monitor rollover safety activities to determine the
potential for providing consumers with comparative information on
levels of protection in the rollover crash mode and on vehicle roll
stability.
In the report, the agency also referred to the possibility of
convening a public meeting on NCAP. A public meeting could provide an
open forum for consumer groups, media, foreign governments, national
and international safety organizations, universities, and motor vehicle
manufacturers to discuss the above NCAP goals and relevant new
suggestions. Comments could be solicited on any of the material in the
Congressional report and opportunities could be given for interested
parties to suggest alternative or additional NCAP goals and activities.
If it is determined that such a meeting is desirable, it could be
scheduled for the late spring of 1994.
Comments are therefore solicited on:
(1) The desirability and need for such a public meeting and
(2) The topics for consideration if a meeting is conducted. These
topics may include all items discussed above that are included in the
Congressional report and others such as:
Additional frontal crash modes and/or higher frontal test
speeds. Efforts in the U.S. and internationally are exploring the
applicability of various frontal crash tests in assessing occupant
protection. Offset and angled frontal tests into deformable and rigid
barriers are being conducted and assessed. What implications do these
additional crash modes and/or higher test speeds have for vehicle
crashworthiness assessment and for vehicle manufacturers?
Additional injury measures. As discussed in the
Congressional report, the Hybrid III crash test dummy provides the
capability to measure additional parameters including neck loads, chest
compression, lower leg loads, and, potentially, abdominal loads. How
would these measures be used to enhance consumer information? Should
such measures be used in consumer information prior to possible
introduction in regulations?
Whether crashworthiness assessment programs should precede
or follow the rulemaking process. For example, the present NCAP
preceded mandatory dynamic frontal crash requirements of FMVSS No. 208
by eight years. (Note: The test procedures and test devices for 30 mph
testing had received prior rulemaking review.) However, in the case of
side impact, expansion of NCAP has awaited completed rulemaking action
prior to the possible initiation of a consumer information program. As
early as May 1984, NHTSA had established the feasibility for improving
occupant protection in side impacts (SAE Paper No. 840886, presented at
the Government/Industry Meeting in May 1984). What are the implications
to consumers and vehicle manufacturers if crashworthiness assessment
programs precede the rulemaking process?
Review of the simplified format. In December 1993, NHTSA
issued the first news release for the model year 1994 vehicles. A
simplified format that utilized a star classification system was
introduced in this release. A copy of the news release can be obtained
by contacting the NHTSA Office of Public and Consumer Affairs. This
classification system is based on a combined probability of life-
threatening head and chest injury to the driver and passenger in the
frontal NCAP test. Is this format effective in providing information to
consumers? Is there agreement on its scientific basis?
Any other relevant issues that the consumers, consumer
organizations, vehicle manufacturers, or other interested parties may
suggest.
Commenters who favor such a meeting should also indicate whether
they might be interested in providing a public statement at the meeting
and on what subjects. If it is decided to conduct a meeting, an
additional public notice will be provided.
Issued on December 27, 1993.
Barry Felrice,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 93-32022 Filed 12-30-93; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-M
