93-32034. CERCLA Administrative Hearing Procedures for Claims Asserted Against the Superfund  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 93-32034]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 3, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 305
    
    [FRL-4818-1]
    RIN 2050-AC26
    
     
    
    CERCLA Administrative Hearing Procedures for Claims Asserted 
    Against the Superfund
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is 
    promulgating a final rule to implement section 112 of the Comprehensive 
    Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
    (CERCLA). CERCLA section 112 outlines procedures for payments of claims 
    authorized pursuant to CERCLA section 111. Furthermore, EPA uses the 
    procedures authorized by CERCLA section 112 to reimburse parties for 
    response costs incurred pursuant to CERCLA section 122. EPA reimburses 
    the parties through payment of claims asserted against the Hazardous 
    Substance Superfund (the Fund). The claims authority allows EPA to 
    reimburse a person for the costs incurred for responding to an actual 
    or threatened release of hazardous substances, pollutants, or 
    contaminants if that person has received prior approval 
    (preauthorization) from EPA to conduct a response action. If EPA denies 
    all or part of a claim against the Fund for the costs incurred in 
    conducting a preauthorized response action, the adversely affected 
    claimant may request an administrative hearing to review that decision. 
    This final rule establishes procedures to request such a hearing and 
    governs the course of the proceeding following the request.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective February 2, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: The official record for this rulemaking is in the Superfund 
    Docket, located at the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 
    401 M Street, SW., Room M 2615, Washington, DC 20460. The record is 
    available for inspection by appointment only (Telephone--202-260-3046) 
    between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays. As provided in 40 CFR part 2, a reasonable 
    fee may be charged for copying services.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugo Paul Fleischman, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial 
    Response, Hazardous Site Control Division, (Mail Code--5203G), 401 M 
    Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460; Telephone--703-603-8769. An 
    alternative contact is the Superfund Hotline; 1-800-424-9346 (TDD 800-
    553-7672), or in the Washington, DC area, (703) 920-9810 (TDD 703-486-
    3323).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contents of today's preamble are listed 
    in the following outline:
    
    I. Background
    II. Response to Comments
    III. Summary of Supporting Analyses
    
    I. Background
    
        EPA is today promulgating the final CERCLA administrative hearing 
    procedures for claims asserted against the Superfund. Today's rule is 
    based on an interim final rule with request for comments promulgated on 
    February 8, 1993, at 58 FR 7704. The rationale for the rule and a 
    discussion of its background and procedures may be found there. One 
    commenter made two specific comments on the interim final rule.
    
    II. Response to Comments
    
        EPA received one comment in two specific areas. The first portion 
    of the comment noted that ``most procedures litigation rules, including 
    the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), provide that Saturdays, 
    Sundays, and legal holidays shall not be counted in calculating short 
    time limits (e.g., ten days or less).'' The commenter went on to note 
    that the rule was at odds with such procedures. EPA notes that while 
    the rule is not identical to the FRCP, there is a good reason for such 
    departure. The procedures in this rule are designed to allow expedited 
    hearings in accord with the time frames provided in CERCLA section 112. 
    Nevertheless, litigants may seek an extension of the time for the 
    Presiding Officer to render a final order in the case, or may extend 
    that time frame by agreement of all parties. See 40 CFR 305.4(c). 
    Furthermore, litigants may seek extensions of time for the filing of 
    pleadings, documents, or motions. See 40 CFR 305.6(b). Therefore, 
    because of the need for expedition, and the availability of extensions 
    provided elsewhere in the rule, EPA believes that no change to the rule 
    is necessary.
        The second portion of the comment noted that the ``service'' rules 
    ``do not provide for service of documents on Federal agencies . . . 
    from which we infer that the rules are not intended to apply to such.'' 
    That inference is incorrect. Because the rule applied to Federal 
    agencies that are potentially responsible parties, EPA has corrected 
    the final rule by adding procedures to serve Federal agencies at 
    Sec. 305.5(b)(1)(v). The amended rule provides that ``(S)ervice upon an 
    officer or agency of the United States shall be made by delivering a 
    copy of the document to the officer or agency, or in any manner 
    prescribed for service by applicable regulations. If the agency is a 
    corporation, the document shall be served as prescribed in paragraph 
    (iii) of this section.'' Like the rest of the rule, the new service 
    provision is modeled on 40 CFR part 22.
        The commenter also raised a ``related question'' regarding the 
    manner and means by which Federal agencies are to be compensated for 
    the costs they incur pursuant to the NCP and related plans. Such 
    comment does not relate to the interim final rule and has been directed 
    to the appropriate EPA official for response.
    
    III. Summary of Supporting Analyses
    
        Proposed and final rules issued by Federal Agencies are subject to 
    several statutes and executive orders. These include Executive Order 
    12291 (superseded by Executive Order 12866 on September 1, 1993), the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the Paperwork Reduction Act.
    
    A. Executive Order Review
    
        This rulemaking was submitted and reviewed by the Office of 
    Management and Budget under Executive Order 12291. The rulemaking was 
    non-major under the requirements of that Executive Order. Therefore, no 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis was prepared.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires that a Regulatory 
    Flexibility Analysis be performed for all rules that are likely to have 
    a ``significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.'' EPA certifies that this rule will not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because all 
    authorized costs and expenses are payable from the Fund. Further, this 
    final rule imposes no capital expenditures, nor any compliance 
    requirements on any business.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The final rule contains no information collection requirements 
    which require approval by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant 
    to 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 305
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, 
    Chemicals, Hazardous materials, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Superfund, Waste treatment and disposal.
    
    Dated: December 16, 1993.
    Carol M. Browner,
    Administrator.
    
        40 CFR part 305 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 305--COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND 
    LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES FOR CLAIMS 
    AGAINST THE SUPERFUND
    
        1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 
    CFR, 1987 Comp. p. 193.
    
        2. Section 305.5 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(2)(v) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 305.5  Filing, service, and form of pleadings and documents.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (2) * * *
        (v) Service upon an officer of agency of the United States shall be 
    made by delivering a copy of the document to the officer or agency, or 
    in any manner prescribed for service by applicable regulations. If the 
    agency is a corporation, the document shall be served as prescribed in 
    paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 93-32034 Filed 12-30-93; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/2/1994
Published:
01/03/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
93-32034
Dates:
This final rule is effective February 2, 1994.
Pages:
25-26 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 3, 1994, FRL-4818-1
RINs:
2050-AC26
CFR: (2)
40 CFR 305.5(b)(1)(v)
40 CFR 305.5