93-32043. Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments; Commission Action  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 93-32043]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 3, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. RM84-6-038]
    
     
    
    Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments; Commission 
    Action
    
    December 27, 1993.
        Take notice that for the reasons set forth below, the Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is ceasing further efforts to 
    recover overdue Btu refunds that are due in 147 cases where the first 
    seller is in bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 of 
    the Bankruptcy Code.1 The Commission believes that further efforts 
    are not warranted because they are not likely to result in any 
    additional recovery, and the Commission's resources are better utilized 
    in other areas. The Commission emphasizes, however, that by this action 
    it is not waiving or extinguishing the Btu refund obligation required 
    to be paid by any bankruptcy court order.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The bankruptcy code is contained in Title 11 of the U.S. 
    Code. The first sellers are listed on Appendix A. Since some first 
    sellers owe refunds to more than one pipeline, the number of first 
    sellers is less than the number of cases.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Background
    
        In 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
    Columbia Circuit vacated the Commission's regulations which permitted 
    first sellers to measure the Btu content of natural gas based on the 
    condition of the gas as actually delivered (the ``dry rule'') and 
    required maximum lawful prices under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 
    (NGPA) to be calculated by measuring the Btu content under the ``wet'' 
    rule that had been in effect under the Natural Gas Act.2
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\Interstate Natural Gas Association of America v. Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission 16 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1983), cert. 
    denied, 465 U.S. 1108 (1984).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Order No. 399, et seq.,3 which implemented the court's 
    decision, required first sellers to refund all overcharges resulting 
    from the use of the ``dry rule'' by November 5, 1986. In addition, 
    interstate and intrastate pipelines were required to file reports 
    identifying first sellers who had not paid their Btu refunds,4 and 
    interstate pipelines were required to flow the Btu refunds through to 
    their customers.5
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\Order No. 399, 49 FR 37735 (Sept. 26, 1984), FERC Stats. & 
    Regs. [Regulations Preambles 1982-1985] 30,597 (Sept. 20, 1984); 
    Order No. 399-A, 49 FR 46353 (Nov. 26, 1984), FERC Stats. & Regs. 
    [Regulations Preambles 1982-1985] 30,612 (Nov. 20, 1984); Order No. 
    399-B, 50 FR 30141 (July 24, 1985), FERC Stats. & Regs. [Regulation 
    Preambles 1982-1985], 30,651 (July 18, 1985).
        \4\Pipelines were required to file the reports by December 18, 
    1984, June 17, 1985, and January 5, 1987.
        \5\The Commission held that the state regulatory agency that 
    regulates an intrastate pipeline may determine the disposition of 
    Btu refunds received by those pipelines.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        More than $1 billion of Btu overcharges have been refunded to 
    customers pursuant to Order No. 399, et seq. The pipelines' refund 
    reports initially showed 5,610 cases totalling over $140 million where 
    the Btu refunds had not been paid. Staff's efforts pursuing payment of 
    outstanding Btu refund obligations reduced the number of pending Btu 
    refund cases to 560 and the total of unpaid Btu refunds to 
    approximately $9.8 million. These numbers do not include 553 cases 
    where the Commission previously determined to cease further collection 
    efforts because such efforts were not likely to result in payment of 
    the Btu refund.6
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\See Notices published in the Federal Register on August 6, 
    1990 (55 FR 32,028), February 14, 1991 (56 FR 6,000), and June 16, 
    1992 (57 FR 26,836). These cases consisted of 467 cases where staff 
    could not locate the first seller; 28 cases where the first seller 
    filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 and the debt was less than 
    $2,000; and 58 cases where the first seller's assets had been 
    liquidated under Chapter 7. The notices emphasized that if the first 
    sellers were subsequently located, the cases would be reactivated.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Discussion
    
        As a result of its efforts pursuing the payment of outstanding Btu 
    refund obligations, the Commission has determined that the first 
    sellers in the 147 cases listed on Appendix A are in bankruptcy 
    proceedings under Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The 
    refund obligation in these cases range from $112.61 to $709,463.38, and 
    totals $3,533,636.05. The Commission does not know the actual 
    disposition of the bankruptcy proceedings of the first sellers listed 
    on Appendix A. However, such knowledge is not necessary for the action 
    that the Commission is now taking. Most of the bankruptcy proceedings 
    were filed more than 4 years ago, and the Btu refund obligation will 
    have been treated in those proceedings in accordance with the 
    applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the 
    Commission believes that no purpose would be served by the Commission 
    continuing to process these cases. Therefore, the Commission will not 
    expend any further staff resources on these cases, and they will be 
    considered closed. This action, however, does not waive or extinguish 
    the payment of any Btu refund obligation that is required to be paid by 
    any order of the bankruptcy court.
        The dollar range in these cases follows: 
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     No. of       Refund    
                      Dollar range                    cases     obligation  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    $100,001-$710,000..............................       8    $1,761,854.11
    50,001-100,000.................................       9       637,526.63
    25,001-50,000..................................      13       480,179.61
    2,001-25,000...................................      80       631,442.18
    100-2,000......................................      37        22,633.52
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
        By direction of the Commission.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    
    Appendix A--First Sellers That Filed Chapter 7 or 11 Bankruptcy
    
    A. Rex Jasper Jr.
    Alan J. Antweil
    Amarex Inc.
    Ambra Oil & Gas Co.
    Amcole Energy Corp.
    American Public Energy Co.
    Amquest Corp.
    Arapaho Petroleum Inc.
    Arrowhead Energy Co.
    Bridge Oil (USA) Inc. (pred: Nucorp Energy Inc.)
    Cayman Production Co.*
    Clerk U.S. Bankruptcy Court of DC Reg. Bank 83-B-O
    Damar
    Delta Energy Resources
    Eads Exploration Inc.
    Earth Energy Resources 19
    Earth Energy Resources Inc.
    Energy Resources Oil
    Enico Pipeline
    Equipment Inc.
    Fritz, J.F. (Payee Erin Baker, Trustee)
    Frontier Exploration Inc.
    G. Murrell (A/C Allied Bank of TX)
    George Schurman
    Great Western Resources
    Herbert E. Russell
    Heston Oil Co.
    Ike Lovelady
    Johnson Oil & Gas Corp.
    L & L Operating Co.
    League Minerals
    Lingen Oil & Gas Inc.
    Magic Circle Energy Corp.
    Majestic Energy Corp.
    Marine Contractors & Supply Inc.
    Marion Corp.
    McMurrey Petroleum Inc.
    Mgf Mansfield Inc.
    Mgf Oil Corp.
    Milton Wessels/Constructive Trust/Uriah Exploration
    Monterrey Petroleum
    Morris R. Antweil
    O'Connor & Young Drilling & Chapman Drilling
    Ohio Partners Oil Co.
    Originala Petroleum
    Owen, J.P. & Co. Inc.
    Partners Oil Co.
    Pecos Irrigation Co.
    Petromark Resources Co.
    Pickard Oil Co. & J.W. Kirk Inc.
    Placid Oil Co.
    Pontchartrain Oil & Gas Corp. #2
    Ports of Call Oil Co.
    Quintex Petroleum Corp.
    R. N. Hillin d/b/a Hillin Production Co.
    Ramsey Property Mgmts, Inc. (Champion Reserve-CRI)
    Resources Investment Corp.
    Richland Resources Corp.
    Robinson Brothers
    Robinson Brothers Drilling Inc.
    Royce Lawson*
    S & J Operating Co.
    Seneca Oil Co.
    Smith Petroleum Co.
    Stockton Oil and Gas
    Taylor Operating Co.
    Tex-OK Petroleum Inc.
    Texas General Petroleum Corp.
    Texas General Resources Inc.
    Tomlinson Oil Co. Inc.
    Tondu Energy Corp.*
    Trans-Western Exploration Inc. (A/C MBank Dallas N)
    Transcontinental Oil Corp. (C/O Paul v. Degenhart)
    William W. Hamilton (Attn: Brett Martin)
    Winter Hawk Ltd.
    
        *Filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.
    
    [FR Doc. 93-32043 Filed 12-30-93; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/03/1994
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
93-32043
Pages:
79-80 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 3, 1994, Docket No. RM84-6-038