94-32288. Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Expenses and Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 3, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 2-3]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-32288]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 966
    
    [Docket No. FV94-966-2FIR]
    
    
    Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Expenses and Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    that authorized expenses and established an assessment rate that will 
    generate funds to pay those expenses. Authorization of this budget 
    enables the Florida Tomato Committee (Committee) to incur expenses that 
    are reasonable and necessary to administer the program. Funds to 
    administer this program are derived from assessments on handlers.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1994, through July 31, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Sue Clark, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. 
    Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, telephone 202-720-
    9918, or Aleck J. Jonas, Southeast Marketing Field Office, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 2276, Winter Haven, FL 33883-
    2276, telephone 813-299-4770.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 125 and Order No. 966, both as amended (7 CFR part 966), 
    regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in Florida. The marketing 
    agreement and order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
    referred to as the Act.
    
        The Department of Agriculture is issuing this rule in conformance 
    with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the provisions of the marketing order now in 
    effect, Florida tomatoes are subject to assessments. It is intended 
    that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all 
    assessable tomatoes handled during the 1994-95 fiscal period, which 
    began August 1, 1994, and ends July 31, 1995. This final rule will not 
    preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they 
    present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Service (AMS) has [[Page 3]] considered the economic impact of this 
    rule on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 250 producers of Florida tomatoes under 
    this marketing order, and approximately 50 handlers. Small agricultural 
    producers have been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 
    CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts of less than $500,000, and 
    small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual 
    receipts are less than $5,000,000. The majority of Florida tomato 
    producers and handlers may be classified as small entities.
        The budget of expenses for the 1994-95 fiscal period was prepared 
    by the Florida Tomato Committee, the agency responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order, and submitted to the Department 
    for approval. The members of the Committee are producers of Florida 
    tomatoes. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the 
    costs of goods and services in their local area and are thus in a 
    position to formulate an appropriate budget. The budget was formulated 
    and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons 
    have had an opportunity to participate and provide input.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Florida 
    tomatoes. Because that rate will be applied to actual shipments, it 
    must be established at a rate that will provide sufficient income to 
    pay the Committee's expenses.
        The Committee met September 8, 1994, and unanimously recommended a 
    1994-95 budget of $2,215,000, $467,000 less than the previous year. 
    Budget items for 1994-95 which have increased compared to those 
    budgeted for 1993-94 (in parentheses) are: Office salaries, $297,300 
    ($276,000); depreciation, $18,200 ($16,200); communications, $12,000 
    ($10,000); employee's retirement program, $46,600 ($37,300); insurance 
    and bonds, $7,000 ($5,000); office rent, $24,700 ($22,600); social 
    security tax, $20,000 ($19,000); supplies and printing, $7,500 
    ($6,500); and audit, $2,500 ($2,300); Items which have decreased 
    compared to those budgeted for 1993-94 (in parentheses) are: Research 
    expense, $192,100 ($200,000); and education and promotion expense, 
    $1,500,000 ($2,000,000). All other items are budgeted at last year's 
    amounts.
        The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of 
    $0.04 per 25-pound container, the same as last year. This rate, when 
    applied to anticipated shipments of 55,000,000 25-pound containers, 
    will yield $2,200,000 in assessment income. This, along with $15,000 in 
    interest and other income, will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
        An interim final rule was published in the Federal Register on 
    November 3, 1994 (59 FR 55020). That interim final rule added 
    Sec. 966.232 to authorize expenses and establish an assessment rate for 
    the Committee. That rule provided that interested persons could file 
    comments through December 5, 1994. No comments were received.
        While this action will impose some additional costs on handlers, 
    the costs are in the form of uniform assessments on handlers. Some of 
    the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these 
    costs will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the 
    marketing order. Therefore, the Administrator of the AMS has determined 
    that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this action until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because the Committee needs to have 
    sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous 
    basis. The 1994-95 fiscal period began on August 1, 1994. The marketing 
    order requires that the rate of assessment for the fiscal period apply 
    to all assessable tomatoes handled during the fiscal period. In 
    addition, handlers are aware of this action which was unanimously 
    recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and published in the 
    Federal Register as an interim final rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
    
        Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Tomatoes.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 966--TOMATOES GROWN IN FLORIDA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 966 which 
    was published at 59 FR 55020 on November 3, 1994, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: December 27, 1994.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-32288 Filed 12-30-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/03/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-32288
Dates:
August 1, 1994, through July 31, 1995.
Pages:
2-3 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV94-966-2FIR
PDF File:
94-32288.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 966.232