95-2147. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes Equipped With General Electric CF6-80C2 Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 15, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 8538-8540]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-2147]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-NM-119-AD; Amendment 39-9132; AD 95-02-13]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes 
    Equipped With General Electric CF6-80C2 Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that requires 
    modification of the fire extinguishing system in the number two engine 
    strut. This amendment is prompted by reports of chafing of the fire 
    extinguishing tubes [[Page 8539]] in a certain inboard strut to wing 
    area. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing 
    of the fire extinguishing tube; such chafing could cause cracking of 
    the tube and consequently produce a hole in the fire extinguishing 
    tube, which could prevent the proper distribution of the fire 
    extinguisher agent within the nacelle in the event of a fire.
    
    DATES: Effective March 17, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of March 17, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamra Elkins, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2669; fax (206) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series 
    airplanes was published in the Federal Register on October 7, 1994 (59 
    FR 51151). That action proposed to require modification of the fire 
    extinguishing system in the number two engine strut.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the two comments received.
        Both commenters support the proposed rule.
        Since issuance of the notice, Boeing has issued Alert Service 
    Bulletin 747-26A2226, Revision 1, dated November 23, 1994. This alert 
    service bulletin is essentially identical to the original issue, but 
    contains certain editorial changes. The FAA has revised the final rule 
    to include reference to this revision of the alert service bulletin as 
    an additional appropriate source of service information.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been added to this final rule to clarify this requirement.
        The FAA has recently reviewed the figures it has used over the past 
    several years in calculating the economic impact of AD activity. In 
    order to account for various inflationary costs in the airline 
    industry, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to increase the 
    labor rate used in these calculations from $55 per work hour to $60 per 
    work hour. The economic impact information, below, has been revised to 
    reflect this increase in the specified hourly labor rate.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
        There are approximately 145 Boeing Model 747 series airplanes 
    equipped with General Electric CF6-80C2 engines of the affected design 
    in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 2 airplanes of U.S. 
    registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 3 
    work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that 
    the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will be 
    supplied by the manufacturer at not cost to the operators. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $360, or $180 per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government.
        Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is 
    determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment.
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-02-13  Boeing: Amendment 39-9132 . Docket 94-NM-119-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes equipped with General 
    Electric CF6-80C2 engines; as listed in Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 747-26A2226, dated June 30, 1994, or Revision 1, dated 
    November 23, 1994; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    [[Page 8540]] eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions 
    necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such 
    a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To ensure proper distribution of the fire extinguisher agent 
    within the nacelle in the event of a fire, accomplish the following:
        -(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, modify 
    the fire extinguishing system in the number two engine strut, in 
    accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 747-26A2226, dated June 30, 1994, or Revision 1, 
    dated November 23, 1994.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The modification shall be done in accordance with Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 747-26A2226, dated June 30, 1994, and Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 747-26A2226, Revision 1, dated November 23, 
    1994. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director 
    of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane 
    Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on March 17, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 24, 1995.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-2147 Filed 2-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/17/1995
Published:
01/30/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-2147
Dates:
Effective March 17, 1995.
Pages:
8538-8540 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-NM-119-AD, Amendment 39-9132, AD 95-02-13
PDF File:
95-2147.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13