95-2166. Houston Lighting and Power Company, et al.; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 19 (Monday, January 30, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5739-5740]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-2166]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499]
    
    
    Houston Lighting and Power Company, et al.; Notice of 
    Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses, 
    Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and 
    Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. 
    NPF-76 and NPR-80, issued to Houston Lighting & Power Company, et al., 
    (the licensee) for operation of the South Texas Project, located in 
    Matagorda County, Texas. The original application dated November 7, 
    1994, was previously published in the Federal Register on December 7, 
    1994 (59 FR 63122). That application was supplemented by letters dated 
    December 20, 1994, and January 23, 1995.
        The proposed amendment would change the number of diesel generators 
    (emergency power supply) required to be operable during Mode 6 with 
    greater than or equal to 23 feet of water above the reactor vessel 
    flange, from two to one. The amendment would also allow limited 
    substitution of an alternate onsite emergency power source for one of 
    the two required diesel generators, in Mode 5 and in Mode 6 with less 
    than 23 feet of water. In addition, changes to certain system 
    specifications that are affected by the changes for the emergency power 
    supply were also proposed.
        In the initial application, dated November 7, 1994, the licensee 
    stated that approval of these changes is required by February 2, 1995, 
    to support the scheduled refueling outage beginning on March 5, 1995. 
    They also stated that they would need this lead time to cover planning 
    and implementation periods. The licensee has been very prompt and 
    attentive to addressing all of the staff's questions and concerns, and 
    had provided two supplements (and revised proposed technical 
    specifications) to address them. These staff questions and concerns 
    were not of a nature that could have reasonably been anticipated by the 
    licensee. Approval of this change will allow the licensee to complete 
    the refueling outage (and commence startup) significantly earlier than 
    without the change.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made finding required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(a)(6) for amendments to be granted under 
    exigent circumstances, the NRC staff must determine that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee as provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        1. The proposed change does not involve a significant increase 
    in the probability or consequences of accidents previously 
    evaluated.
        The equipment which is affected by the technical specification 
    changes proposed here are not precursors to any accident postulated 
    to occur in Modes 5 and 6. Therefore, the probability of an accident 
    is not increased. A design review has demonstrated the ability of 
    the required systems to perform their accident mitigation functions 
    for the postulated accidents during mode 5 and 6 operation. 
    Therefore, it is concluded that an increase in the consequences of 
    the postulated accidents will not result from the proposed Technical 
    Specifications.
        2. The proposed change does not create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
        The system design, function, and performance is not affected by 
    these specifications. No new equipment interactions are created. 
    Calculations and Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEA) have been 
    conducted for selected mechanical systems and show there are no 
    failures which would cause situations where applicable accidents 
    would not be mitigated or which would cause new accidents. On this 
    basis, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
        3. The proposed change does not involve a significant reduction 
    in the margin of safety.
        The electrical power system specifications support the equipment 
    required to be operable, commensurate with the current level of 
    safety, including the equipment requiring a diesel backed power 
    source. The design review results demonstrate that operation in 
    Modes 5 and 6, in accordance with the proposed Technical 
    Specification changes, is acceptable from an accident mitigation 
    standpoint. The basic Modes 5 and 6 plant system functions are not 
    changed. On this basis, the proposed change does not involve a 
    significant reduction in the margin of safety.
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
    this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
    satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
    amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
        The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
    determination. Any comments received within 15 days after the date of 
    publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
    determination.
        Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
    expiration of the 15-day notice period. However, should circumstances 
    change during the notice period, such that failure to act in a timely 
    way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, 
    the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of 
    the 15-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that 
    the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final 
    determination will consider all public and State comments received. 
    Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the Federal 
    Register a notice of issuance. The Commission expects that the need to 
    take this action will occur very infrequently.
        Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Rules Review and 
    Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and Publications 
    Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555, and should cite the publication date and page 
    number of this Federal Register notice. Written comments may also be 
    delivered to Room 6D22, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
    Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. 
    Copies of written comments received may be examined at the NRC Public 
    Document Room, the [[Page 5740]] Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC.
        The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to 
    intervene is discussed below.
        By February 14, 1995, the licensee may file a request for a hearing 
    with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility 
    operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Wharton County Junior College, J.M. Hodges 
    Learning Center, 911 Boling Highway, Wharton, Texas 77488. If a request 
    for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above 
    date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 
    designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety 
    and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; 
    and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
    will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of 
    the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
    proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be 
    entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition 
    should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of 
    the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person 
    who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been 
    admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of 
    the Board up to 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy 
    the specificity requirements described above.
        Not later than 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to 
    the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions 
    which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must 
    consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be 
    raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a 
    brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise 
    statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the 
    contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the 
    contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references 
    to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is 
    aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those 
    facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information 
    to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material 
    issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within 
    the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be 
    one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A 
    petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these 
    requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be 
    permitted to participate as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        If the amendment is issued before the expiration of the 30-day 
    hearing period, the Commission will make a final determination on the 
    issue of no significant hazards consideration. If a hearing is 
    requested, the final determination will serve to decide when the 
    hearing is held.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves 
    no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
    amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
    request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
    of the amendment.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a 
    significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place 
    before the issuance of any amendment.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Services 
    Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 
    the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, by the above 
    date. Where petitions are filed during the last 10 days of the notice 
    period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform the 
    Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-(800) 
    248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union operator 
    should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the following 
    message addressed to William D. Beckner, Director, Project Directorate 
    IV-1: petitioner's name and telephone number, date petition was mailed, 
    plant name, and publication date and page number of this Federal 
    Register notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to the 
    Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555, and to Jack R. Newman, Esq., Newman & Holtzinger, 
    P.C., 1615 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, attorney for the 
    licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated November 7, 1994, as supplemented by 
    letters dated December 20, 1994, and January 23, 1995, which are 
    available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
    Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at 
    the local public document room, located at the Wharton County Junior 
    College, J.M. Hodges Learning Center, 911 Boling Highway, Wharton, 
    Texas 77488.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of January 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Thomas W. Alexion,
    Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-1, Division of Reactor Projects 
    III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 95-2166 Filed 1-27-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/30/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-2166
Pages:
5739-5740 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499
PDF File:
95-2166.pdf