96-1681. Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station; Toledo Edison Company; Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 3060]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-1681]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 72-14, 50-346, 72-1004 (License No. NPF-3)]
    
    
    Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station; Toledo Edison Company; Receipt 
    of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206
    
        Notice is hereby given that by a Petition dated December 5, 1995, 
    filed on behalf of the Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy, Alice Hirt, 
    Charlene Johnston, Dini Schut, and William Hoops (Petitioners), the 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission was requested to immediately issue orders 
    to prevent the loading of spent nuclear fuel into the VECTRA 
    Technologies Inc., NUHOMS-24P dry shielded canisters (DSCs) at the 
    Davis-Besse nuclear power station until an NRC rulemaking and/or 
    license modification hearing is conducted on all safety-related changes 
    which have been made to the canisters, as described in the Safety 
    Analysis Report. Also, the NRC was requested not to authorize any 
    loading of the canisters until a written procedure for unloading in 
    both urgent and nonurgent circumstances is written, approved, and 
    field-tested.
        Petitioners contend that the safety of the canisters has been 
    compromised because of reduction in the thickness of the canister 
    welds. In addition, they claim that the NRC administrative process by 
    which permission was granted for VECTRA to deliver the canisters to the 
    Davis-Besse station and for the canisters to be used on site are 
    legally suspect, expressing the belief that agency rulemaking or some 
    other public proceeding is necessary for permission for such a transfer 
    and use to be granted.
        The Petition is being treated pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206 of 
    the Commission's regulations. The Petition has been referred to the 
    Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. As 
    provided by Section 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this 
    Petition within a reasonable time. By letter dated December 18, 1995, 
    the Director denied the Petitioners' request for immediate action on 
    the Petition.
        A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
    Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 
    20555.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of January 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Carl J. Paperiello,
    Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 96-1681 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-p
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/30/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-1681
Pages:
3060-3060 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 72-14, 50-346, 72-1004 (License No. NPF-3)
PDF File:
96-1681.pdf