94-2023. Almonds Grown in California; Reopening of Comment Period on Interim Final Rule  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-2023]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 31, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 981
    
    [Docket No. FV93-981-2IFR]
    
     
    
    Almonds Grown in California; Reopening of Comment Period on 
    Interim Final Rule
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Reopening of comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document reopens the period for filing written comments 
    on an interim final rule establishing a revised advertising program 
    under the almond marketing order. That rule substantially revised the 
    advertising program and broadened the scope of creditable promotion/
    advertising activities available to handlers and expanded the Board's 
    ability to engage in a significant generic promotion/advertising 
    program.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by March 2, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this reopened action. Comments must be sent in triplicate to 
    the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, 
    USDA, room 2523-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, FAX 
    Number (202) 720-5698. Comments should reference the docket number, the 
    date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be 
    made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk 
    during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen M. Finn, Marketing 
    Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, room 2536-S., P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 
    20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-1509, or FAX (202) 720-5698; or Martin 
    Engeler, Assistant Officer-in-Charge, California Marketing Field 
    Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, 
    suite 102-B, Fresno, California 93721; (209) 487-5901 or FAX (209) 487-
    5906.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The interim final rule was issued under 
    Marketing Agreement and Order No. 981 (7 CFR part 981), both as 
    amended, regulating the handling of almonds grown in California. The 
    marketing agreement and order are authorized by the Agricultural 
    Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), 
    hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        The interim final rule was issued on July 14, 1993, and published 
    in the August 17, 1993, issue of the Federal Register (57 FR 43500). It 
    amended Sec. 981.441 of Subpart--Administrative Rules and Regulations 
    by substantially revising the Board's promotion/advertising program by 
    broadening the scope of creditable activities available to handlers and 
    expanding the Board's ability to engage in a significant and more 
    effective generic promotion/advertising program.
        Authority for marketing promotion, including paid advertising, was 
    added to the almond marketing order in 1972. This authority allows 
    handlers to receive credit against an assessment obligation for their 
    own paid promotional activities, and also provides for generic 
    promotion to be conducted by the Board on behalf of the industry.
        Since this authority was added to the marketing order, almond 
    production has increased, markets have expanded, the number of handlers 
    has increased and the relative proportion of product sold to ingredient 
    manufacturers in bulk quantities has likewise increased. The creditable 
    promotion/advertising regulations issued under the almond marketing 
    order have been changed numerous times to better meet industry needs 
    and changing market conditions (37 FR 13790, 7/14/72, as amended at 37 
    FR 16930, 8/28/72; 38 FR 9988, 4/23/73; 39 FR 39258, 11/6/74; 40 FR 
    25437, 6/16/75; 42 FR 5342, 1/28/77; 44 FR 67076, 11/23/79; 46 FR 
    51603, 10/21/81; 47 FR 40784, 9/16/82; 48 FR 11250, 3/17/83; 49 FR 
    19798, 5/10/84; 50 FR 16452, 4/26/85; 52 FR 13428, 4/23/87; 52 FR 
    37926, 10/13/87; 52 FR 45611, 12/1/87; 54 FR 5409, 2/3/89; 54 FR 6866, 
    2/15/89; 55 FR 130, 1/3/90; 55 FR 30194, 7/25/90; 55 FR 41826, 10/16/
    90; 57 FR 30383, 7/9/92; 58 FR 33023, 6/15/93).
        The most recent change in the advertising regulations substantially 
    revised the creditable promotion/advertising program by incorporating a 
    new program called the ``credit-back'' program.
        On December 22, 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the 
    Ninth Circuit in California issued a ruling on a district court order 
    involving an action against the Department by three independent almond 
    handlers wherein such handlers alleged, among other things, that the 
    Board's advertising program during the 1980's was unconstitutional 
    because the program violated the handlers' First Amendment Rights. The 
    district court ruled that the advertising program was constitutional. 
    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals acknowledged the substantial public 
    interest in designing effective promotion programs to stimulate demand 
    and to increase returns to growers but concluded that the almond 
    program in place during the 1980's was sufficiently flawed that it did 
    not meet the constitutional standards.
        In light of the potential effect of the Ninth Circuit Court of 
    Appeal's decision on the current promotion program conducted under the 
    almond marketing order and on the health of the almond industry as a 
    whole, the Department has determined that it is in the public interest 
    to reopen the comment period for this interim final rule. Such action 
    will provide interested persons the opportunity to review the rules for 
    the current program and submit additional written views and information 
    pertinent to the potential effect of the decision on the current 
    program and on how the Department can best address the issues raised in 
    the court's decision. Accordingly, the comment period is reopened to 
    March 2, 1994.
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        Dated: January 25, 1994.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-2023 Filed 1-28-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/31/1994
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Reopening of comment period.
Document Number:
94-2023
Dates:
Comments must be received by March 2, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 31, 1994, Docket No. FV93-981-2IFR
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 981