95-2355. Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order; Deformed Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Peru

[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5900-5901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-2355]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
C-333-502


Determination Not To Revoke Countervailing Duty Order; Deformed 
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Peru

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Import Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of determination not to revoke countervailing duty 
order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is notifying the 
public of its determination not to revoke the countervailing duty order 
on deformed steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Peru.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright or Melanie Brown, 
Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: 
[phone].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 31, 1994, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (59 FR 54436) its intent to revoke the countervailing duty 
order on deformed steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Peru (50 
FR 48819; November 27, 1985). Under 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii), the 
Secretary of Commerce will conclude that an order is no longer of 
interest to interested parties and will revoke the order if no domestic 
interested party objects to revocation and no interested party requests 
an [[Page 5901]] administrative review by the last day of the fifth 
anniversary month.
    Within the specified time frame, we received an objection from a 
domestic interested party to our intent to revoke this countervailing 
duty order. Therefore, because the requirements of 19 CFR 
355.25(d)(4)(iii) have not been met, we will not revoke the order.
    This determination is in accordance with 19 CFR 355.25(d)(4).

    Dated: January 25, 1995.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Compliance.
[FR Doc. 95-2355 Filed 1-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P