94-55. Navel and Valencia Oranges Grown in Arizona and Designated Parts of California; Change in Reporting Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 1994)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 241-243]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-55]
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 1994 /
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 4, 1994]
    
    
                                                         VOL. 59, NO. 2
    
                                               Tuesday, January 4, 1994
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 907 and 908
    
    [FV93-907-1FIR]
    
     
    
    Navel and Valencia Oranges Grown in Arizona and Designated Parts 
    of California; Change in Reporting Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    changing reporting requirements prescribed under the California-Arizona 
    navel and Valencia orange marketing orders. The marketing orders 
    regulate the handling of navel and Valencia oranges grown in Arizona 
    and designated parts of California and are administered locally by the 
    Navel and Valencia Orange Administrative Committees (committees). This 
    rule modifies language in the orders' rules and regulations to 
    discontinue the use of Form 38 (Weekly Report of By-Product Oranges) 
    and specify that Form 3 (Daily Manifest Report of Oranges Subject to 
    Allotment) only be utilized for reporting rail car shipments. These 
    actions reduce the burden of information collection requirements under 
    the marketing orders.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 3, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline C. Thorpe, Marketing 
    Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, room 
    2522-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456: telephone: (202) 
    720-5127; or Maureen Pello, California Marketing Field Office, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey 
    Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California, 93721; telephone: (209) 487-
    5901.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
    Order Nos. 907 and 908 (7 CFR parts 907 and 908), as amended, 
    regulating the handling of navel and Valencia oranges grown in Arizona 
    and designated parts of California, hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``orders.'' These orders are effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    action.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 8c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed 
    not later than 20 days after date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service 
    (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this action on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 140 handlers of navel oranges and 125 
    handlers of Valencia oranges who are subject to regulation under the 
    respective marketing order and approximately 3,750 producers of navel 
    oranges and 3,700 producers of Valencia oranges in the regulated areas. 
    In addition, there are about 35 by-product manufacturers that will be 
    affected by this rule. Small agricultural service firms, which includes 
    handlers and by-product manufacturers, have been defined by the Small 
    Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual 
    receipts of less than $3,500,000, and small agricultural producers are 
    defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $500,000. The 
    majority of handlers, producers, and processors of California-Arizona 
    navel and Valencia oranges may be classified as small entities.
        This action finalizes changes in the reporting requirements 
    prescribed under the California-Arizona orange marketing orders. This 
    rule modifies language in the orders' rules and regulations to 
    discontinue the use of Form 38 (Weekly Report of By-Product Oranges) 
    and specify that Form 3 (Daily Manifest Report of Oranges Subject to 
    Allotment) only be utilized for reporting rail car shipments. These 
    changes were unanimously recommended by the committees.
        The interim final rule was issued on October 8, 1993, and published 
    in the Federal Register (58 FR 53112, October 14, 1993), with an 
    effective date of October 14, 1993. That rule amended Secs. 907.131, 
    907.141, 908.131, and 908.141 of the rules and regulations in effect 
    under the orders. That rule provided a 30-day comment period which 
    ended November 15, 1993. No comments were received.
        Sections 907.67 and 908.67 of the navel and Valencia orange 
    marketing orders provide authority for the exemption from order 
    regulation the handling of oranges to commercial processors for 
    processing into products, including juice. Sections 907.131 and 908.131 
    of the orders' rules and regulations prescribe procedures governing the 
    exemption from order regulation of such by-product oranges. Included in 
    these procedures are certain reporting requirements imposed on handlers 
    and by-product manufacturers to help ensure that order requirements and 
    regulations governing the exemption for by-product oranges are being 
    followed.
        For example, persons who wish to acquire oranges as an approved by-
    products manufacturer for commercial processing into by-products exempt 
    from regulation must submit an application to the committee on Form 14 
    (Application to be Placed on Approved List of Orange By-Product 
    Manufacturers). These applications are referred to the committees' 
    compliance department for investigation and then, if appropriate, 
    referred to the committees for approval to be placed on an approved 
    list of by-product manufacturers. Commercial processors are also 
    required to submit to the committees copies of Form 15 (Orange 
    Diversion Report) which specify how the oranges were disposed. Finally, 
    approved by-product manufacturers were required to submit Form 38 
    (Weekly Report of By-Product Oranges) during the crop year when 
    processing is occurring.
        The committees have recommended that submission of Form 38 no 
    longer be required under the marketing orders. Submission of Form 38 
    was added to the orders' rules and regulations in 1990 because the 
    committees believed that the additional information would help to 
    ensure that oranges exempted under the by-products exemption did not 
    enter the fresh fruit market. It was believed that comparisons of the 
    total amount of oranges received by processors with the total amount of 
    by-products manufactured would give the committees a method to verify 
    that all oranges received were manufactured into by-products.
        However, the committees have found that the information collected 
    on Form 38 is not necessary to ensure compliance with order 
    requirements. In addition, much of the information on Form 38 is 
    collected on other reports required to be submitted under the orders. 
    The committees believe that submission of Form 38 creates an additional 
    burden on by-product manufacturers that is not necessary. Thus, the 
    committees recommended revising the orders' rules and regulations to 
    discontinue the use of Form 38. The Department has also made some minor 
    modifications to Sec. 907.131 and 908.131 for the purpose of clarity.
        The second change that the committees recommended concerns Form 3 
    (Daily Manifest Report of Oranges Subject to Allotment). Sections 
    907.71 and 908.71 of the orange marketing orders provide that handlers 
    furnish to the committees information regarding cartons of oranges 
    handled, segregated by size, within 24 hours of shipment. Handlers must 
    also indicate whether the shipments were destined to points in the U.S. 
    and Alaska or Canada.
        Sections 907.141 and 908.141 of the orders' rules and regulations 
    require handlers to submit, on Form 3, a manifest report of oranges 
    shipped within a 24 hour period. Prior to the effective date of the 
    interim final rule, handlers were required to include both truck and 
    rail car shipments on Form 3. However, identical information regarding 
    truck shipments is submitted by handlers on Form 8 (Certificate of 
    Assignment of Allotment). According to the committees, this duplication 
    of information created an added burden for handlers and was not 
    necessary. Thus, the committees recommended modifying the orders' rules 
    and regulations to require that handlers only report rail car shipments 
    on Form 3. Handlers are still required to submit rail manifests and 
    other appropriate documentation to the committees to substantiate rail 
    car shipments.
        The information collection requirements contained in the referenced 
    sections have been previously approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 and have been 
    assigned OMB numbers 0581-0116 for navel oranges and 0581-0121 for 
    Valencia oranges.
        This rule reduces the reporting burden on approximately 25 
    processors of navel and Valencia oranges who had been completing Form 
    38, taking about 0.33 hour to complete each report. This rule also 
    reduces the reporting burden on approximately 210 handlers who ship 
    primarily by truck, taking about 0.40 hour to complete each report. 
    About 80 handlers who ship by rail at some point during a season will 
    continue to use Form 3, taking approximately 0.20 hour to complete the 
    report.
        Based on these considerations, the Administrator of the AMS has 
    determined that this action will not have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the committees, and other 
    information, it is found that finalizing the interim final rule, 
    without change, as published in the Federal Register (58 FR 53112, 
    October 14, 1993) will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the 
    Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 907 and 908
    
        Marketing agreements, Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 907 and 908 
    are amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for both 7 CFR parts 907 and 908 
    continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    PART 907--NAVEL ORANGES GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIGNATED PART OF 
    CALIFORNIA
    
        2. Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 907, 
    which was published at 58 FR 53112 on October 14, 1993, is adopted as a 
    final rule without change.
    
    PART 908--VALENCIA ORANGES GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DESIGNATED PART OF 
    CALIFORNIA
    
        3. Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 908, 
    which was published at 58 FR 53112 on October 14, 1993, is adopted as a 
    final rule without change.
    
        Dated: December 27, 1993.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-55 Filed 1-3-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/04/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-55
Dates:
February 3, 1994.
Pages:
241-243 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 4, 1994, FV93-907-1FIR
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 907
7 CFR 908