94-128. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 1994)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 606-607]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-128]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 5, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323]
    
     
    
    Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit 
    Nos. 1 and 2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant 
    Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of amendments to Facility Operating Licensing Nos. 
    DPR-80 and DPR-82, issued to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the 
    licensee), for operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 
    2, located in San Luis Obispo, California.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed amendment would consist of revisions to the Technical 
    Specifications in response to the revised 10 CFR part 20. The change 
    would revise the limitations on the dose rate resulting from 
    radioactive material released in gaseous effluents, and reflect the 
    relocation of the prior 10 CFR 20.106 requirements to the new 10 CFR 
    20.1302. These changes are in response to the licensee's application 
    for amendments dated July 7, 1993.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is needed in order to retain operational 
    flexibility consistent with 10 CFR part 50, appendix I, concurrent with 
    the implementation of the revised 10 CFR part 20.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed revision, in regard to the actual release rates as 
    referenced in the Technical Specifications (TS) as a dose rate to the 
    maximally exposed member of the public, will not increase the types or 
    amounts of effluents that may be released offsite, nor increase 
    individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures. Therefore, 
    the Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed amendments.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    changes do not affect nonradiological effluents and have no other 
    environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there 
    are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated 
    with the proposed amendments.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission concluded that there are no significant 
    envirommental impacts associated with the proposed amendments to the 
    TS, any alternative to the amendments will have either no significantly 
    different environmental impact or will have greater environmental 
    impact. The principal alternative would be to deny the requested 
    amendments. This would not reduce environmental impacts as a result of 
    plant operation.
    
    Alternatives Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of resources not previously 
    considered in the Final Environmental Statement and Addendum related to 
    the operation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, dated May 
    1973 and May 1976, respectively.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        The Commission's staff reviewed the licensee's request and did not 
    consult other agencies or persons.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental 
    impact statement for the proposed license amendments.
        Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, we conclude that 
    the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality 
    of the human environment.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated July 7, 1993, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L 
    Street NW., Washington, DC and at the California Polytechnic State 
    University, Robert E. Kennedy Library, Government Documents and Maps 
    Department, San Luis Obispo, California 93407.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Theodore R. Quay,
    Director, Project Directorate V, Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-128 Filed 1-4-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/05/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
94-128
Pages:
606-607 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 5, 1994, Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323