98-34827. Agency Priorities and Public Participation in the Implementation of the 1998 Agreement on Global Technical Regulations; Statement of Policy  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 563-570]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-34827]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    [Docket No. NHTSA-98-4956, Notice 1]
    RIN 2127-AH29
    
    
    Agency Priorities and Public Participation in the Implementation 
    of the 1998 Agreement on Global Technical Regulations; Statement of 
    Policy
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Request for comments; notice of public workshop.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: NHTSA is holding a public workshop and soliciting written 
    public comments on a draft statement of policy concerning (1) agency's 
    priorities in the implementation of the United Nations/Economic 
    Commission for Europe 1998 Agreement on Global Technical Regulations 
    for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts, and (2) this agency's 
    activities and practices for facilitating public participation in the 
    implementation of the 1998 Agreement. The policy statement would go 
    into effect when the 1998 Agreement enters into force. The notice also 
    explores other methods for promoting public participation, e.g., the 
    possibility of including members of the public as advisers in the NHTSA 
    delegation.
        The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) which, together with 
    NHTSA, negotiated the Agreement for the U.S., will participate in the 
    public workshop. EPA plans to issue a similar statement of policy.
    
    DATES: Public workshop: The public workshop will be held on February 3, 
    1999, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
        Those wishing to participate in the workshop should contact Ms. 
    Julie Abraham by February 1, 1999.
        Written comments: Written comments may be submitted to this agency 
    and must be received by February 18, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Public workshop: The public workshop will be held in rooms 
    6200-6204 of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh St. SW, Washington DC 
    20590.
        Written comments: All written comments must refer to the docket and 
    notice number of this notice and be submitted (preferably 2 copies) to 
    the Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, 
    DC 20590. (Docket Room is open 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday.)
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
        Ms. Julie Abraham, Director, Office of International Harmonization, 
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC. Telephone: (202) 366-2114. Fax: (202) 366-2106.
        Ms. Rebecca MacPherson, National Highway Traffic Safety 
    Administration, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20590. 
    Telephone: (202) 366-2992. Fax: (202) 366-3820.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Table of Contents
    
    I. Introduction
        A. Opening of 1998 Agreement for signature
        B. Purpose of and need for 1998 Agreement
        C. Issue of public participation
        D. Purpose of this notice
    II. Background
        A. May 1998 final rule on process for assessing safety 
    performance and functional equivalence of U.S. and foreign standards
        B. June 1998 public meeting on initial plans for promoting 
    public participation in the implementation of the 1998 Agreement
    III. Highlights of 1998 Agreement
    IV. Discussion of policy statement
    V. Other methods for promoting public participation
    VI. Public workshop
        A. Purpose
        B. Procedures
        C. Agenda
    VII. Regulatory analyses and notices
    VIII. Written comments
    Draft policy statement
    
    I. Introduction
    
    A. Opening of the 1998 Agreement for Signature
    
        On June 25, 1998, the U.S. became the first signatory to the United 
    Nations/Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) 1 Agreement 
    Concerning the Establishing of Global Technical Regulations for Wheeled 
    Vehicles, Equipment and Parts Which Can Be Fitted And/or Be Used on 
    Wheeled Vehicles (the ``1998 Agreement''). This agreement was 
    negotiated under the
    
    [[Page 564]]
    
    auspices of the UN/ECE under the leadership of the U.S., European 
    Community and Japan.2 The 1998 Agreement provides for the 
    establishment of global technical regulations regarding the safety, 
    emissions, energy conservation and theft prevention of wheeled 
    vehicles, equipment and parts. The covered equipment and parts include, 
    but are not limited to, exhaust systems, tires, engines, acoustic 
    shields, anti-theft alarms, warning devices, and child restraint 
    systems.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ The Economic Commission for Europe was established by the 
    United Nations in 1947 to help rebuild post-war Europe, develop 
    economic activity and strengthen economic relations between European 
    countries and between them and the other countries of the world.
        \2\ At the opening of the 1998 agreement for signature, 
    representatives of the European Community and Japan indicated 
    interest in becoming signatories. The representative of the European 
    Community said that the Community is ``committed to completing its 
    internal procedures at the earliest opportunity in order to sign the 
    Agreement without delay.'' Although the representative of Japan did 
    not refer to any specific time frame for Japan's accession to the 
    Agreement, he did state that Japan believes that ``it is very 
    important that many countries join this process and cooperate in 
    this forum towards the global harmonization of technical 
    regulations.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Purpose of and Need for 1998 Agreement
    
        The decision of the U.S. to sign the 1998 Agreement and participate 
    in a global standards development process is a critical step toward a 
    cooperative worldwide search for best safety and environmental 
    practices. The U.S. does not have a vote under an existing earlier UN/
    ECE agreement regarding wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts, known as 
    the 1958 Agreement, since the U.S. is not a signatory to that 
    agreement.3 This has limited the ability of the U.S. to 
    influence the substance of the standards adopted under the 1958 
    Agreement.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ In 1955, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 
    established, under the Inland Transport Committee, the Working Party 
    on the Construction of Vehicles (commonly known as WP 29). In 1958, 
    WP 29 created procedures for establishing uniform regulations 
    regarding motor vehicles, equipment and parts, including those 
    affecting road safety. These procedures were codified in 1958 by UN/
    ECE Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of 
    Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of Approval for Motor Vehicle 
    Equipment and Parts, (commonly referred to as the 1958 Agreement). 
    The 1958 Agreement also established a system for mutual recognition 
    of each party's approvals of motor vehicle equipment and parts, as 
    long as these approvals were granted in accordance with the 1958 
    Agreement's conditions. While the original 1958 Agreement dealt 
    primarily with safety issues, in the late 1960s, the Working Group 
    on Pollution and Energy and the Working Group on Noise were 
    instituted as subgroups of WP 29 for the purpose of developing 
    emission and noise regulations respectively, and in 1995, the 
    agreement was revised to include the development of regulations 
    concerning pollution and energy. There are now six Working Groups: 
    the Working Group on Noise; the Working Group on Lighting and Light-
    Signalling; the Working Group on Pollution and Energy; the Working 
    Group on Brakes and Running Gear; the Working Group on General 
    Safety Provision; and the Working Group on Passive Safety.
        Fifty-five countries, including the United States, participate 
    in WP 29. However, only 28 European countries are party to the 1958 
    Agreement. The WP 29, through its administration of the 1958 
    Agreement, is the only multinational governmental forum currently 
    coordinating the development of motor vehicle safety and 
    environmental regulations. The 1958 Agreement has provided the 
    European countries with a U.N.-based forum to promulgate their 
    automotive regulations within Europe. More recently, this regulation 
    development forum has become a reference source for motor vehicle 
    regulations for many other parts of the world, which has expanded 
    the adoption of European regulations rather than those of the United 
    States.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Becoming a Contracting Party to the 1998 Agreement accomplishes 
    several purposes for the U.S. It gives the U.S. a vote in the 
    establishment of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, 
    equipment and parts under the UN/ECE and enables the U.S. to take a 
    leading role in effectively influencing the selection of the level of 
    vehicle safety regulations worldwide. This is appropriate since the 
    U.S. has been at the forefront in collecting and analyzing crash data, 
    conducting vehicle safety research, analyzing the impacts of regulatory 
    alternatives, and requiring high levels of safety. The Agreement 
    ensures that U.S. standards and their benefits will be properly 
    considered in any effort to adopt a harmonized global technical 
    regulation.
    
    C. Issue of Public Participation
    
        Various public interest groups have expressed concerns about the 
    opportunities for the public to participate in activities related to 
    the 1998 Agreement. Similar concerns have been expressed by other 
    groups about other international agreements providing for the 
    establishment of international standards by organizations that meet 
    outside the U.S. The common concern is that global technical 
    regulations will be established abroad without adequate involvement of 
    the American public. In the case of the 1998 Agreement, groups have 
    also expressed the view that the decisions made in Geneva could pre-
    determine the outcome of subsequent rulemaking proceedings in the U.S., 
    even though Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSSs) cannot be 
    amended or established without satisfaction of the Administrative 
    Procedure Act and the statutory provisions governing the FMVSSs.
    
    D. Purpose of This Notice
    
        The purpose of this notice is to obtain oral and written comments 
    on a draft policy statement that has two purposes. First, it sets forth 
    a listing of priorities that will guide this agency during its 
    participation in activities under the 1998 Agreement when the Agreement 
    enters into force. Second, it sets forth the practices and activities 
    that this agency could use to ensure that the public has the 
    information and opportunity necessary to follow the development of 
    global technical regulations under the 1998 Agreement and to provide 
    its views, beginning at the earliest stages, regarding those 
    regulations.
    
    II. Background
    
    A. May 1998 Final Rule on Process for Assessing Safety Performance and 
    Functional Equivalence of U.S. and Foreign Standards
    
        On May 13, 1998, this agency published a final rule reaffirming its 
    policy of focusing its international harmonization activities on 
    identifying those foreign vehicle safety standards that clearly reflect 
    best practices, i.e., that require significantly higher levels of 
    safety performance than the counterpart U.S. standard. (63 FR 26508) 
    NHTSA's policy is to upgrade its standards to the level of those 
    foreign standards.
        NHTSA emphasized that three goals must remain of primary importance 
    as this agency participates in efforts to explore the possibility of 
    harmonizing its standards with those of other countries and regions in 
    appropriate circumstances. First, this agency must ensure that there is 
    no degradation of the safety provided by a regulation as a result of 
    achieving harmonization. Second, this agency must preserve the quality 
    and transparency of its regulatory process by inviting all interested 
    parties to be heard and duly considered. Third, this agency must 
    preserve its ability to respond, through future rulemaking, to changing 
    safety technology and problems and make appropriate improvements in its 
    safety standards.
        The final rule also announced this agency's policy regarding 
    instances in which its comparison of standards indicates that the 
    safety performance required by a foreign standard is not significantly 
    higher, but is still better than or at least as good as that required 
    by the counterpart U.S. standard. In those instances, this agency said 
    that it will consider the possibility of amending the U.S. standard to 
    allow manufacturers to comply with either standard or to harmonize the 
    U.S. standard with the foreign standard.
        Since the final rule was issued slightly more than one month before 
    the June 1998 UN/ECE meeting in Geneva at which the U.S. expected to 
    sign the 1998 Agreement, NHTSA reaffirmed in the final rule its 
    commitment to
    
    [[Page 565]]
    
    transparency and public participation in connection with international 
    harmonization activities. With respect to the implementation of the 
    1998 Agreement, this agency emphasized that it would not only keep the 
    public advised of the key activities and make available key documents 
    relating to the development of vehicle safety standards under the 1998 
    Agreement, but also provide appropriate, and timely, opportunities for 
    obtaining public input regarding the merits of these matters. This 
    agency said that it would elaborate more fully on its procedures 
    regarding transparency and public participation in the near future.
    
    B. June 1998 Public Meeting on Initial Plans for Promoting Public 
    Participation in the Implementation of the 1998 Agreement
    
        In a June 17, 1998 public meeting in Washington, D.C., NHTSA took 
    the next step. It laid out its initial plans for promoting effective 
    public participation at the earliest stage in the consideration of 
    global technical regulations concerning motor vehicle safety. The 
    centerpiece of the plans was a set of activities and practices in the 
    U.S. that would parallel the global technical regulation development 
    process in Geneva. NHTSA said that the activities and practices would 
    include the following measures:
         Access to information. NHTSA will post on its Website 
    information such as a periodically-updated agenda of scheduled meetings 
    of WP 29 and its committees (called working parties of experts) related 
    to the 1998 Agreement; key documents, such as proposed global technical 
    regulations referred under the 1998 Agreement to working parties of 
    experts for their consideration; and working party reports recommending 
    establishment of specific global technical regulations. NHTSA already 
    has worked with the UN/ECE to ensure that the documents generated by WP 
    29 are accessible on the internet to the public. NHTSA also has worked 
    with the UN/ECE to ensure that the meetings of WP 29 are open to the 
    public.
         Opportunity to be heard. NHTSA will solicit comments from 
    the public at key intervals during the development of global technical 
    regulations. NHTSA will place those comments in the U.S. Department of 
    Transportation's internet-accessible public docket.
         Opportunity to discuss. NHTSA will hold periodic public 
    meetings to discuss developments at recent meetings of WP 29 and its 
    working parties of experts related to the 1998 Agreement.
        In addition, this agency invited representatives of the industry 
    and consumer groups and other members of the public to participate as 
    advisers in the U.S. delegation that will attend the meetings of the 
    full membership in Geneva. This agency announced that a public workshop 
    for discussion of the plan will be scheduled and a statement of policy 
    will be published in the Federal Register so that the public can review 
    and comment on it.
        A broad spectrum of interests were represented at the June public 
    meeting. Among the attendees were representatives of the European 
    Commission, the Japan Automobile Standards Internationalization Center, 
    domestic and foreign motor vehicle manufacturers, and various public 
    interest groups.
        Representatives of four public interest groups spoke briefly at the 
    meeting. All four generally supported this agency's planned activities 
    and practices, but urged that even more efforts be made to promote 
    public participation.
        Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) said that this 
    agency must do more than offer a chance for the public to comment on 
    technical regulations being developed under the 1998 Agreement. 
    Advocates submitted a paper listing the specific steps that it believed 
    this agency and EPA must take at each of the following three phases of 
    negotiation: before any negotiations begin, during any negotiations, 
    and after negotiations have produced a text of a tentative global 
    technical regulation. For example, it said that this agency must accept 
    public comments before developing its negotiating positions and then 
    must declare those positions before going to Geneva to begin 
    negotiations. If negotiations in Geneva cause this agency to conclude 
    that it is desirable to change a previously declared U.S. negotiating 
    position, this agency's negotiators must first return to the U.S. and 
    seek public comments before actually changing the U.S. position. Before 
    voting on a recommended global technical regulation, this agency must 
    first seek public comment. In addition to providing copies of all key 
    documents, this agency should provide the stated positions of other 
    Contracting Parties to the 1998 Agreement.
        The Alliance of Insurance Associations (AIA) endorsed the 
    procedural suggestions made by Advocates. AIA asked that this agency 
    incorporate its public participation measures in a legally binding 
    regulation. That organization also expressed concern about issues 
    related to the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade 
    Agreement (TBT Agreement).4 AIA was particularly concerned 
    that a case could be made under the TBT Agreement against U.S. 
    standards that are higher than the technical regulations adopted under 
    the 1998 Agreement. That organization suggested that objecting 
    countries could argue that the U.S. could have and should have adopted 
    a less trade restrictive approach for achieving the safety benefits in 
    question.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ One of the agreements of the Uruguay Round administered by 
    the World Trade Organization (WTO) is the TBT agreement. (http://
    www.wto.org) The purpose of the TBT agreement is to ensure that 
    product standards, technical regulations, and related procedures do 
    not create unnecessary obstacles to trade. At the same time, the TBT 
    agreement clearly recognizes that each country has the right to 
    establish and maintain technical regulations for the protection of 
    human, animal, and plant life and health and the environment, and 
    for prevention against deceptive practices.
        In the TBT agreement, the term ``standard'' is defined as:
        [A] document approved by a recognized body, that provides, for 
    common and repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for 
    products or related symbols, packaging, marking or labelling 
    requirements as they apply to a product, process or production 
    method.
        Also, ``technical regulation'' is defined as:
        [A] document which lays down product characteristics or their 
    related processes and production methods, including applicable 
    administrative provisions, with which compliance is mandatory 
    [emphasis added]. It may also include or deal exclusively with 
    terminology, symbols, packaging, marking, or labelling requirements 
    as they apply to a product, process or production method.
        Thus, in the language of the TBT agreement, when a government 
    acts to accept a voluntary standard to make it mandatory, the 
    resulting document is a technical regulation. A measure used to 
    ascertain compliance with a standard or technical regulation is a 
    conformity assessment procedure.
        The TBT agreement states that, where technical regulations are 
    required and relevant international standards exist or their 
    completion is imminent, WTO-member countries shall use them, or the 
    relevant parts of them, as a basis for their processes and 
    production methods, with which compliance is not mandatory. It may 
    also include or deal exclusively with terminology, technical 
    regulations, except when such international standards or relevant 
    parts would be an ineffective or inappropriate means for the 
    fulfillment of the legitimate objectives pursued. Further, the 
    agreement states that, with a view towards harmonizing technical 
    regulations on as wide a basis as possible, WTO-member countries 
    shall play a full part within the limits of their resources in the 
    preparation by appropriate international standards bodies of 
    international standards for products for which they either have 
    adopted or expect to adopt technical regulations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Consumers Union (CU) endorsed the statements by Advocates and AIA. 
    CU urged the establishment of a continuing public forum regarding the 
    implementation of the 1998 Agreement. That organization said that this 
    agency's negotiators 5 should, before going to Geneva, 
    discuss options and alternative
    
    [[Page 566]]
    
    U.S. negotiating positions, how negotiations might go, and where and 
    how far U.S. can or should go in negotiations. CU said that the 
    negotiators should also conduct post-negotiation debriefings. CU 
    mentioned two models that NHTSA could follow in promoting public 
    participation in the implementing of the 1998 Agreement: the U.S. Codex 
    6 delegation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food 
    Safety Inspection Service. CU urged NHTSA to choose the U.S. Codex 
    delegation, calling it the better of the two models.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ NHTSA negotiators include both its representative to WP 29 
    as well as its representatives on the working parties of experts.
        \6\ The U.S. Codex delegation consists of officials from the 
    U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Food and Drug 
    Administration, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. They 
    participate in the activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. 
    The Codex is the major international mechanism for promoting the 
    health and economic interests of consumers, while encouraging fair 
    international trade in food. The U.S. Codex Manager coordinates all 
    Codex activities within the United States. The Manager, who reports 
    to the Under Secretary for Food Safety in USDA, is assisted by the 
    U.S. Codex Office, housed in the Food Safety and Inspection Service, 
    USDA.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety expressed support for 
    the views of the other groups and stated that NHTSA's policy with 
    respect to harmonization should always be to harmonize upward and to 
    identify and adopt best safety practices.
    
    III. Highlights of 1998 Agreement
    
        To aid persons unfamiliar with the 1998 Agreement in gaining an 
    understanding of its provisions, this agency has summarized the key 
    aspects below. The complete text of the Agreement may be found on the 
    Internet at the following address: http://www.itu.int/itudoc/un/
    editrans/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29glob.html.
         The Agreement establishes a global process under the 
    United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE), for developing 
    and harmonizing global technical regulations ensuring high levels of 
    environmental protection, safety, energy efficiency and anti-theft 
    performance of wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be 
    fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles. Motor vehicle engines are 
    included. (Preamble, Art. 1)
         Members of the ECE, as well as members of the United 
    Nations that participate in ECE activities, are eligible to become 
    Contracting Parties to the 1998 Agreement. Specialized agencies and 
    organizations that have been granted consultative status may 
    participate in that capacity. (Art. 2)
         The Agreement will enter into force by September 26, 1999, 
    if a minimum of five (5) countries or regional economic integration 
    organizations (e.g., the European Community (EC)) have become 
    Contracting Parties. The five must include the EC, Japan, and U.S. 
    (Art. 11)
        If the Agreement does not enter into force by that date, it will 
    enter into force thereafter when a minimum of eight (8) countries or 
    regional economic integration organizations become Contracting Parties. 
    At least one of the eight must be either the EC, Japan, or the U.S. 
    (Art. 11)
         The Agreement explicitly recognizes the importance of 
    continuously improving and seeking high levels of safety and 
    environmental protection and the right of national and subnational 
    authorities, e.g., California, to adopt and maintain technical 
    regulations that are more stringently protective of health and the 
    environment than those established at the global level. (Preamble)
         The Agreement explicitly states that one of its purposes 
    is to ensure that actions under the Agreement do not promote, or result 
    in, a lowering of safety and environmental protection within the 
    jurisdiction of the Contracting Parties, including the subnational 
    level. (Art. 1)
         To the extent consistent with achieving high levels of 
    environmental protection and vehicle safety, the Agreement also seeks 
    to promote global harmonization of motor vehicle and engine 
    regulations. (Preamble)
         The Agreement emphasizes that the development of global 
    technical regulations will be transparent. (Art. 1)
        Annex A provides that the term ``transparent procedures'' includes 
    the opportunity to have views and arguments represented at:
        (1) meetings of Working Parties through organizations granted 
    consultative status; and
        (2) meetings of Working Parties and of the Executive Committee 
    through pre-meeting consulting with representatives of Contracting 
    Parties.
         The Agreement provides two different paths to the 
    establishment of global technical regulations. The first is the 
    harmonization of existing standards. The second is the establishment of 
    a new global technical regulation where there are no existing 
    standards. (Article 6.2 and 6.3)
         The process for developing a harmonized global technical 
    regulation includes a technical review of existing regulations of the 
    Contracting Parties and of the UN/ECE regulations, as well as relevant 
    international voluntary standards (e.g., standards of the International 
    Standards Organization 7). If available, comparative 
    assessments of the benefits of these regulations (also known as 
    functional equivalence assessments) are also reviewed. (Art. 1.1.2, 
    Article 6.2)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ The International Standards Organization (ISO) is a non-
    governmental, worldwide federation of national standards bodies from 
    approximately 130 countries. (http://www.iso.ch) It was established 
    in 1947. Its mission is to promote the development of 
    standardization and related activities in the world with a view to 
    facilitating the international exchange of goods and services, and 
    to developing cooperation in the spheres of intellectual, 
    scientific, technological and economic activity. Its work is carried 
    out through a hierarchy of technical committees, subcommittees, and 
    working groups.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
         The process for developing a new global technical 
    regulation includes the assessment of technical and economic 
    feasibility and a comparative evaluation of the potential benefits and 
    cost effectiveness of alternative regulatory requirements and the test 
    method(s) by which compliance is to be demonstrated. (Article 6.3)
         To establish any global technical regulation, there must 
    be a consensus vote. Thus, if any Contracting Party votes against a 
    recommended global technical regulation, it would not be established. 
    (Annex B, Article 7.2)
         The establishment of a global technical regulation does 
    not obligate Contracting Parties to adopt that regulation into its own 
    laws and regulations. Contracting Parties retain the right to choose 
    whether or not to adopt any technical regulation established as a 
    global technical regulation under the Agreement. (Preamble, Article 7)
         Consistent with the recognition of that right, Contracting 
    Parties have only a limited obligation when a global technical 
    regulation is established under the Agreement. If a Contracting Party 
    voted to establish the regulation, that Contracting Party must initiate 
    the procedures used by the Party to adopt such a regulation as a 
    domestic regulation. (Article 7)
        For the U.S., this would likely entail initiating the rulemaking 
    process by issuing an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) or 
    a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). If the U.S. were to adopt a 
    global technical regulation into national law, it would do so in 
    accordance with all applicable procedural and substantive statutory 
    provisions, including the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 553 et seq., the Vehicle Safety Act, and comparable provisions of 
    other relevant statutes, such as the Clean Air Act.
         The Agreement allows for global technical regulations to 
    contain a ``global'' level of stringency for most
    
    [[Page 567]]
    
    parties and `alternative' levels of stringency for developing 
    countries. In this way, all countries, including the least developed 
    ones, can participate in the development, establishment and adoption of 
    global technical regulations. It is anticipated that a developing 
    country may wish to begin by adopting one of the lower levels of 
    stringency and later successively adopt higher levels of stringency. 
    (Article 4)
    
    IV. Discussion of the Draft Policy Statement and Response to Public 
    Comments at the June 17 Public Meeting
    
        Publication of a policy statement. In this notice, this agency sets 
    forth a draft policy statement that generally describes its priorities 
    and its planned activities and practices for promoting public 
    participation. NHTSA will revise the statement as appropriate in 
    response to public comment and publish it in the Federal Register. 
    NHTSA has tentatively chosen this approach, instead of a binding 
    regulation as suggested by AIA, in recognition of the newness both of 
    the Agreement and of NHTSA's involvement in activities under an 
    international agreement to which the U.S. is a contracting party. 
    Particularly at the beginning, there must be a sufficient degree of 
    flexibility so that the activities and procedures can evolve easily and 
    quickly as the U.S. and other Contracting Parties gain experience in 
    using limited resources to implement the Agreement in a manner that 
    advances safety and environmental protection and involves the public in 
    that effort.
        While the need for flexibility must be met, NHTSA recognizes that 
    there is also an equal need for identifying this agency's specific 
    activities and practices that will provide the three basic elements 
    outlined at the June public meeting. Those elements are: access to 
    information, opportunity to be heard, and opportunity to discuss. 
    Activities and practices relating to each of those elements are clearly 
    set out in the draft policy statement.
        Access to information. This agency will publish an annual calendar 
    of meetings and listing of global technical regulations under 
    consideration. To promote the availability of documents as they are 
    generated under the 1998 Agreement and become available in English, 
    this agency will provide the addresses to the Websites of the UN/ECE 
    and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU):
    
    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
        http://www.unece.org/Welcome.html
    Inland Transport Committee (ITC) of the UN/ECE
        http://www.unicc.org/unece/trans/
    Working Party on the Construction of Vehicles (WP 29) of the ITC
        http://www.unicc.org/unece/trans/main/unecewp.htm
    Working parties of experts of WP 29
        http://www.itu.ch/itudoc/un/editrans/wp29/wp29wgs.html
    
        The ITU maintains a Website that covers, among other subjects, the 
    activities of the Inland Transport Committee of the UN/ECE and its 
    various working parties. (http://www.itu.ch/itudoc/un/editrans.html) 
    Within the limits of its resources, and primarily with respect to the 
    development of particularly important global technical regulations, 
    this agency will also place the documents in the internet-accessible 
    DOT docket and place key documents on a word-searchable location in its 
    Website.
        Opportunity to be heard. This agency plans to seek public comment 
    at two points during the development of global technical regulations. 
    In the case of a proposal to be submitted by the U.S. for a global 
    technical regulation, the first point would be before the proposal is 
    submitted.8 In the case of a proposed global technical 
    regulation submitted by a Contracting Party other than the U.S., the 
    first point at which the agency would solicit public comment would be 
    when the proposal is referred under the 1998 Agreement to a working 
    party of experts for consideration. In all cases, the second point 
    would be when and if a working party of experts issues a report 
    recommending the adoption of a global technical regulation.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\  If the proposal concerns issues on which this agency has 
    recently obtained public comment as part of a rulemaking proceeding, 
    it would not seek further comment before submitting the proposal.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        NHTSA will seek comments by publishing a request for comments. In 
    the case of a proposal that the U.S. contemplates offering, the notice 
    would describe the contemplated proposal and assess its impacts. This 
    agency would fully consider those comments and make any appropriate 
    changes to its proposal for a global technical regulation, if 
    commenters submit sufficient supporting technical data and analysis. In 
    the case of a proposal submitted by another Contracting Party, the U.S. 
    would likely issue a short notice summarizing the proposal and seeking 
    comments.
        Opportunity to discuss. This agency plans to hold informal meetings 
    to brief the public about recent and anticipated deliberations and 
    standards development work under the 1998 Agreement at those meetings. 
    In addition, interested parties may raise questions related to those 
    subjects. The public meetings would be scheduled so that one would 
    precede each of the three annual WP 29 meetings (i.e., in March, June 
    and November).
        NHTSA solicits comments on where it should hold its public meetings 
    on activities related to the 1998 Agreement. It also solicits comments 
    on whether these 1998 Agreement meetings should be combined with this 
    agency's existing quarterly public meetings at which it discusses its 
    vehicle rulemaking. Three of those quarterly rulemaking meetings are 
    held in Detroit, Michigan. The fourth is held in Washington, D.C.
        Discussion of U.S. negotiating positions. To the extent consistent 
    with retaining the ability to negotiate effectively with other 
    Contracting Parties, NHTSA would use the quarterly meetings to keep 
    interested parties generally informed about the U.S. negotiating 
    positions on issues under the 1998 Agreement. However, this agency 
    tentatively concludes that it would be impracticable to adopt the 
    suggestion by Advocates at the June 17 public meeting that the NHTSA 
    negotiators should return to the U.S. and justify any departure from a 
    previously announced negotiating position under that Agreement. Having 
    to return to the U.S., as suggested by Advocates, would make 
    negotiations very lengthy and unwieldy.
        Post-negotiation debriefings. NHTSA believes that this need can be 
    met at the public meetings to be held on activities related to the 1998 
    Agreement.
        Establishment of a continuing forum. This agency believes that the 
    periodic meetings will provide the public not only with an opportunity 
    to discuss recent and future developments under the 1998 Agreement, but 
    also general procedural issues involved in the implementation of that 
    Agreement.
        Following the model of the U.S. Codex delegation or FDA in 
    providing for public participation. 
        At the suggestion of CU, the NHTSA Director of International 
    Harmonization met with Dr. F. Edward Scarbrough, the U.S. Manager for 
    Codex, on August 13, 1998. Dr. Scarbrough described the efforts made by 
    the members of the U.S. Codex delegation to develop and publicize a 
    general description of the U.S. position regarding the agenda items to 
    be discussed at upcoming meetings of the committees of Codex 
    Alimentarius Commission. By way of example, he mentioned the 
    descriptions that would be provided and discussed the next day at a 
    public meeting held in preparation for the September 1998 meeting of 
    the
    
    [[Page 568]]
    
    Codex Committee on General Principles. (The notice announcing that 
    meeting was published at 63 Fed. Reg. 42608, on August 10, 1998.)
        He also noted the notice published by the FSIS on February 12, 1998 
    about duties of U.S. Government delegates and delegation members 
    including non-government members. (63 Fed. Reg. 7118) That notice:
    
    describes the activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission 
    (Codex); describes the duties of the United States delegate and 
    alternate delegate to Codex committees; provides the criteria and 
    procedures to be used in selecting non-government members to various 
    United States delegations to Codex committees; describes the 
    appropriate role of non-government members on Codex committees; 
    identifies the manner in which the public will be informed of and 
    may participate in Codex activities; and requests comments on these 
    matters.
    
    With respect to advising the public of the positions of the U.S. 
    Government about Codex activities, paragraph V.C. of that notice 
    states:
    
        The United States delegate will notify members of the public who 
    have indicated an interest in a particular Codex committee's 
    activities of the status of each agenda item and the United States 
    Government's position or preliminary position on the agenda item, if 
    such a position has been determined. The United States delegate may 
    request members of the public who have indicated an interest in a 
    particular Codex committee's activities to submit written comments. 
    Public meetings may also be held to receive comments.
    
    The content and disposition of public comments is discussed in 
    paragraph V.E. of the February notice:
    
        Public comments relevant to Codex committee activities should be 
    supported by as much data or research as possible and such data or 
    research should be properly referenced to enhance the persuasive 
    impact of the comments. The United States delegate will consider all 
    comments received but will not be bound to agree with any comment. 
    The views expressed in these comments may or may not be presented by 
    the United States delegate to a Codex committee.
    
        Dr. Scarbrough also discussed the role and responsibilities of non-
    government members of U.S. delegations. For example, he noted that the 
    February 1998 notice stated that while the U.S. delegate will, to the 
    extent feasible, consult and seek recommendations for non-government 
    members, the U.S. delegate will not be obliged to present at any Codex 
    committee session any recommendation made by a non-government member.
        NHTSA has attempted to reflect the results of its talk with Dr. 
    Scarbrough in the draft policy statement. However, this agency is open 
    to further suggestions and perspectives. Accordingly, this agency 
    invites commenters to address the following question: In establishing 
    the activities and practices that NHTSA will use in providing for 
    public participation in the implementation of the 1998 Agreement, what 
    specific lessons should be drawn from the experiences of the Food and 
    Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture's Food 
    Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) with respect to the Codex, and FDA 
    with respect to the International Conference of Harmonisation of 
    Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human 
    Use (ICH) (drug safety)? 9 10
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\  The ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for 
    tripartite harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from 
    both regulatory and industry representatives. ICH is concerned with 
    harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of 
    pharmaceutical products among three regions: The European Union, 
    Japan, and the United States. The six ICH sponsors are the European 
    Commission, the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries 
    Associations, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the 
    Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Centers for 
    Drug Evaluation and Research and Biologics Evaluation and Research, 
    FDA, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. 
    The ICH Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation of 
    documentation, is provided by the International Federation of 
    Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA). The ICH Steering 
    Committee includes representatives from each of the ICH sponsors and 
    the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World Health Organization, 
    the Canadian Health Protection Branch, and the European Free Trade 
    Area.
        \10\ For information concerning FDA and FSIS involvement in the 
    Codex and ICH, see the following Federal Register notices or contact 
    those agencies directly:
         FDA, ``International Harmonization; Policy on 
    Standards,'' (October 11, 1995; 60 FR 53078).
         FSIS, ``Codex Strategic Planning Meeting,'' (May 1, 
    1997; 62 Fed. Reg. 23745).
         FDA, ``Consideration of Codex Alimentarius Standards,'' 
    (July 7, 1997; 62 FR 36243).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Interested persons desiring information regarding these other 
    harmonization activities may wish to consult the following Websites:
    
    US Codex Office
        http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/codex/;
    Codex Alimentarius Commission:
        http://www.fao.org/waicent/faoinfo/economic/esn/codex/
    FDA (including the ICH)
        http://www.fda.gov/oia/homepage.htm
    
        Best safety practices. This agency reaffirms its prior statements 
    that the identification and adoption of best safety practices is its 
    highest priority in its international harmonization activities.
        TBT Agreement issues. The U.S. is well-positioned to defend its 
    vehicle safety standards against a complaint under the TBT Agreement 
    that the standard is higher than the technical regulations adopted 
    under the 1998 Agreement as well as against a complaint that the 
    standard is more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve the safety 
    benefits in question. NHTSA takes great care in establishing the safety 
    needs for its standards and in assessing the benefits and other impacts 
    of its safety standards. Both the TBT Agreement and the 1998 Agreement 
    expressly recognize the right of nations to adopt safety standards more 
    stringent than existing international standards.
    
    V. Other Methods for Promoting Public Participation
    
        Currently, the motor vehicle industry and consumers are represented 
    at meetings of WP 29 and of its working parties of experts by 
    international organizations that have been granted consultative status 
    by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. The industry 
    is represented by the Organisation Internationale Des Constructeurs 
    D'Automobiles (OICA) (International Organization of Motor Vehicle 
    Manufacturers), while consumers are represented by Consumers 
    International. Those organizations participate in the discussions, but 
    cannot vote.
        The 1998 Agreement expressly provides for participation of any 
    specialized agency and any organization, including intergovernmental 
    organizations and non-governmental organizations. Paragraph 2.3 of 
    Article 2 provides
    
        Any specialized agency and any organization, including 
    intergovernmental organizations and non-governmental organizations, 
    that have been granted consultative status by the Economic and 
    Social Council of the United Nations, may participate in that 
    capacity in the deliberations of any Working Party during 
    consideration of any matter of particular concern to that agency or 
    organization.
    
        At the June 17 public meeting, the Administrator raised the 
    possibility of members of the public participating as private sector 
    advisers on a U.S. delegation at meetings under the 1998 Agreement. 
    This agency notes that if a manufacturer or public interest group were 
    to take advantage of this opportunity, it would have to provide its own 
    funding. The selection of private sector advisers and protocol 
    governing their participation are set forth in the final guidelines 
    published by the Department of State concerning the participation of 
    representatives of affected private sector interests to serve as 
    advisers on U.S. delegations to international conferences, meetings and 
    negotiations (44 Fed. Reg. 17846; March
    
    [[Page 569]]
    
    23, 1979). This agency solicits comments on the extent of public 
    interest and ability to serve as private sector advisers.
    
    VI. Public Workshop
    
        All interested persons and organizations are invited to attend the 
    workshop. To assist interested parties to prepare for the February 3, 
    1999 workshop, this agency has developed a preliminary agenda, shown 
    below, of introductory presentations and of major topics for discussion 
    at the meeting. Requests for this agency to consider adding additional 
    topics should be addressed to Ms. Julie Abraham at the address or 
    numbers given above.
    
    A. Purpose
    
        This agency is holding a workshop to facilitate the interactive 
    exchange and development of ideas among all participants. The purpose 
    is to present and discuss the planned activities and practices for 
    facilitating public participation in the implementation of the 1998 
    Agreement. NHTSA hopes that through an interactive discussion, 
    opportunities to improve the draft policy statement can be identified. 
    NHTSA plans to consider the information and views presented at the 
    workshop and in the subsequent written comments in developing the 
    policy statement it will issue.
    
    B. Procedures
    
        This agency intends to conduct the workshop informally. The 
    Director of International Harmonization will preside at the workshop, 
    with the participation of the NHTSA's and EPA's representatives on WP 
    29's working parties of experts. The Director will first give a brief 
    overview of the 1998 Agreement, followed by brief presentations by 
    agency officials regarding the operation of WP 29 and its work plans. 
    Then the presiding official will discuss all of this agency's planned 
    activities and practices for promoting public participation. As each 
    activity or practice is presented, the participants will be asked for 
    comments and input. At any point during the workshop, and upon request, 
    the presiding official will allow participants to ask questions or 
    provide comments. When commenting, participants should approach the 
    microphone and state their name and affiliation for the record. All 
    participants are asked to be succinct. Participants may also submit 
    written questions to the presiding official and request that they be 
    directed to particular participants.
        Any person planning to participate should contact Ms. Julie Abraham 
    at the address and telephone number given at the beginning of this 
    notice, no later than 10 calendar days before the workshop.
    
    C. Agenda
    
    i. Opening remarks
        Ricardo Martinez, Administrator (NHTSA)--10 min.
    ii. 1998 Agreement: opportunities for seeking higher levels of safety 
    and broader public participation
        Julie Abraham, Director of International Harmonization (NHTSA)--15 
    min.
    iii. WP 29 procedures for developing technical regulations under the 
    1958 and 1998 Agreements
        Ken Feith, Policy Advisor, Office of Air and Radiation (EPA)--20 
    min.
    iv. The U.S. role in the implementation of the 1958 Agreement
        WP 29 Working Party of Experts on Lighting and Light-Signalling: 
    recent events and future directions
        Richard Van Iderstine, U.S. Representative (NHTSA)--5 min.
        WP 29 Working Party of Experts on Pollution and Energy: recent 
    events and future directions
        Thomas Baines, U.S. Representative (EPA)--5 min.
        WP 29 Working Party of Experts on Noise: recent events and future 
    directions
        Ken Feith, U.S. Representative (EPA)--5 min.
        WP 29 Working Party of Experts on Passive Safety: recent events and 
    future directions
        Dr. William R. S. Fan, U.S. Representative (NHTSA)--5 min.
        Case example illustrating the current role of NGO's in the 
    development of a UN/ECE technical regulation Frank Turpin, Office of 
    International Harmonization (NHTSA) (Retired)--10 min.
    v. Interactive discussion of public participation in the implementation 
    of the 1998 Agreement 11
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\  The participants in the interactive discussion are 
    encouraged to discuss the issues on which the agency has solicited 
    comments in the preamble to this notice, i.e.:
        What lessons should be drawn from the experiences of the FDA and 
    FSIS with respect to the Codex, and of the FDA with respect to the 
    International Conference of Harmonisation of Technical Requirements 
    for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) (drug 
    safety)?
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The policy statement
        Access to information
        Opportunity to comment
        Opportunity to discuss
        Other measures for promoting public participation
        Participation in U.S. delegation
    
    VII. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
    
        Since this request for comment contemplates the establishment of a 
    statement of policy (as opposed to a regulation or rule) that will not 
    have the force and effect of law, this request is not subject to the 
    requirements of the various Executive Orders (e.g., Executive Order 
    12866), statutes or DOT regulatory policies and procedures for analysis 
    of the impacts of rulemaking. Further, it is not subject to the notice 
    and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. 
    Nevertheless, this agency has decided to seek public comment on the 
    statement of policy before publishing a final version.
    
    VIII. Comments
    
        This agency invites all interested parties to submit written 
    comments. This agency notes that participation in the public workshop 
    is not a prerequisite for submission of written comments. Written 
    comments should be sent to the address and follow the same requirements 
    specified above in section ADDRESSES. It is requested but not required 
    that two copies be submitted.
        All comments must not exceed 15 pages in length (49 CFR 553.21). 
    Necessary attachments may be appended to these submissions without 
    regard to the 15-page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage 
    commenters to detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion.
        If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim 
    of confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including 
    the purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted 
    to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and two 
    copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been 
    deleted should be submitted to Docket Management. A request for 
    confidentiality should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth 
    the information specified in this agency's confidential business 
    information regulation. 49 CFR Part 512.
        All comments received by NHTSA before the close of business on the 
    comment closing date indicated above for the notice will be considered, 
    and will be available for examination in the docket at the above 
    address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, 
    comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Comments 
    received too late for consideration in regard to the policy statement 
    to be issued will be considered as suggestions for future action. 
    Comments on the notice will be
    
    [[Page 570]]
    
    available for inspection in the docket. NHTSA will continue to file 
    relevant information as it becomes available in the docket after the 
    closing date, and recommends that interested persons continue to 
    examine the docket for new material.
        Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their 
    comments in the docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped 
    postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the 
    comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail.
    Statement of Policy: NHTSA Priorities and Public Participation in the 
    Implementation of the UN/ECE 1998 Agreement on Global Technical 
    Regulations
    I. Our Priorities Under the 1998 Agreement
        A. Advance vehicle safety by identifying and adopting best safety 
    practices from around the world or by developing new standards 
    reflecting technological advances and current and anticipated safety 
    problems.
        B. Seek to harmonize our safety standards with those of other 
    countries, to the extent consistent with maintaining existing levels of 
    motor vehicle safety.
        C. Notwithstanding our harmonization efforts, preserve our ability 
    to adopt standards that meet U.S. vehicle safety needs.
        D. Ensure the opportunity for public participation, through means 
    such as pre-rulemaking activities and practices.
    II. Procedures for Providing Public Information and Facilitating Public 
    Participation
        A. Access to information.
        1. Annual calendar of activities and list of pending work.
        We will publish annually a notice providing (a) a calendar of 
    scheduled meetings of WP 29 and its working parties of experts; and (b) 
    a list of the global technical regulations relating to motor vehicle 
    safety, theft or energy conservation that are being considered by a 
    working party of experts, or that have been recommended by a working 
    party of experts for establishment under the 1998 Agreement.
        2. Availability of documents relating to global technical 
    regulations proposed by Contracting Parties and global technical 
    regulations recommended by working parties of experts.
        As we obtain English versions of key documents relating to motor 
    vehicle safety, theft or energy conservation that are generated under 
    the 1998 Agreement (e.g., proposals referred to a working party of 
    experts, and reports and recommendations issued by a working party), we 
    will place them in the internet-accessible DOT docket 
    (www.dms.dot.gov). Since documents in the DOT docket are imaged 
    documents, they cannot be word-searched. Within the limits of available 
    resources, we will also place the documents on an international 
    activities page that will be included in our Website. This additional 
    step will give interested persons the ability to word-search the 
    documents.
        B. Opportunity to comment.
        1. Proposals by Contracting Parties for consideration of global 
    technical regulations.
        a. Proposals by the U.S.
        Before we submit a proposal for the development of a global 
    technical regulation relating to motor vehicle safety, theft or energy 
    conservation for consideration under the 1998 Agreement, we will 
    publish a notice requesting public comments on our proposal. We will 
    consider those comments before submitting our proposal to the Executive 
    Committee.
        (1) U.S. proposal for harmonizing existing technical regulations.
        Our notice will compare the proposed harmonized standard and the 
    related existing U.S. standard, including the relative impacts of those 
    standards.
        (2) U.S. proposal for establishing a new global technical 
    regulation.
        Our notice will discuss (i) the safety, theft or energy 
    conservation problem addressed by the proposal, (ii) the rationale for 
    the proposed approach for addressing the problem, and (iii) the impacts 
    of the proposal.
        b. Proposals by Contracting Parties other than the U.S.
        After a Contracting Party other than the U.S. submits a proposal 
    for a global technical regulation relating to motor vehicle safety, 
    theft or energy conservation for consideration under the 1998 
    Agreement, we will place a copy of an English language version of the 
    proposal in the DOT docket and, within the limit of our resources, may 
    also post it on our Website. We will also publish a brief notice 
    summarizing the proposal, indicating where it may be located in the DOT 
    docket (and/or on the internet), and inviting public comment. We will 
    consider those comments in connection with our participation in future 
    deliberations under that Agreement.
        2. Recommendations by a working party of experts for the 
    establishment of a global technical regulation.
        When a working party of experts issues a report recommending the 
    establishment of any global technical regulation (including one based 
    on one of our proposals) relating to motor vehicle safety, theft or 
    energy conservation, we will place a copy of an English language 
    version of the report in the DOT docket and, within the limit of our 
    resources, may also post it on our Website. We will also publish a 
    brief notice summarizing the recommended regulation, indicating where 
    the report may be located in the DOT docket (and/or on the internet), 
    and inviting public comment. We will consider those comments in 
    connection with our participation in future deliberations under the 
    1998 Agreement.
    
    (Note: If we subsequently initiate a rulemaking proceeding 
    concerning the subject matter of any document mentioned above in 
    paragraphs 1-3, we will place the comments relating to the document 
    in the docket for that proceeding and address them as appropriate.)
    
        C. Opportunity to discuss.
        We will hold public meetings to summarize the events under the 1998 
    Agreement since the last meeting held pursuant to this policy statement 
    and the anticipated upcoming events. We will also discuss key issues 
    regarding pending standards development work relating to motor vehicle 
    safety, theft or energy conservation under the 1998 Agreement, and 
    public comments regarding those issues. Our representatives on the 
    working parties of experts, and, as appropriate, other agency 
    officials, will also participate in those meetings.
    
        Issued on December 29, 1998.
    Julie Abraham,
    Director, Office of International Harmonization.
    [FR Doc. 98-34827 Filed 12-30-98; 2:37 pm]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/05/1999
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Request for comments; notice of public workshop.
Document Number:
98-34827
Dates:
Public workshop: The public workshop will be held on February 3, 1999, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Pages:
563-570 (8 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA-98-4956, Notice 1
RINs:
2127-AH29: Public Participation in Activities Relating to the Agreement on Global Technical Regulations: Statement of Policy
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2127-AH29/public-participation-in-activities-relating-to-the-agreement-on-global-technical-regulations-stateme
PDF File:
98-34827.pdf