99-33. Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Final Free and Restricted Percentages for the 1998-99 Crop Year for Tart Cherries  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 5, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 387-392]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-33]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 930
    
    [Docket No. FV98-930-1 FR]
    
    
    Tart Cherries Grown in the States of Michigan, et al.; Final Free 
    and Restricted Percentages for the 1998-99 Crop Year for Tart Cherries
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule establishes final free and restricted 
    percentages for the 1998-99 crop year. The percentages are 60 percent 
    free and 40 percent restricted. The percentages establish the 
    proportion of cherries from the 1998 crop which may be handled in 
    normal commercial outlets and are intended to stabilize supplies and 
    prices, and strengthen market conditions. The percentages were 
    recommended by the Cherry Industry Administrative Board (Board), the 
    body which locally administers the marketing order. The marketing order 
    regulates the handling of tart cherries grown in the States of 
    Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and 
    Wisconsin.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 6, 1999 through June 30, 1999, and applies to 
    all tart cherries handled from the beginning of the 1998-99 crop year.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia A. Petrella or Kenneth G. 
    Johnson, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491. Small businesses may request 
    information on complying with this regulation, or obtain a guide on 
    complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing 
    agreements and orders by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, P.O. 
    Box 96456, Room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 
    720-2491; Fax: (202) 205-6632, or E-mail: Jay__--N__ Guerber@usda.gov. 
    You may also view the marketing agreements and orders small business 
    compliance guide at the following website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/
    f.v./moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under marketing 
    agreement and Order No. 930 (7 CFR part 930), regulating the handling 
    of tart cherries produced in the States of
    
    [[Page 388]]
    
    Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and 
    Wisconsin, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is 
    effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as 
    amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order provisions now in effect, 
    final free and restricted percentages may be established for tart 
    cherries handled by handlers during the crop year. This rule 
    establishes final free and restricted percentages for tart cherries for 
    the 1998-99 crop year, beginning July 1, 1998, through June 30, 1999. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        The order prescribes procedures for computing an optimum supply and 
    preliminary and final percentages that establish the amount of tart 
    cherries that can be marketed throughout the season. The regulations 
    apply to all handlers of tart cherries that are in the regulated 
    districts. Tart cherries in the free percentage category may be shipped 
    immediately to any market, while restricted percentage tart cherries 
    must be held by handlers in a primary or secondary reserve, or be 
    diverted in accordance with section 930.59 of the order and section 
    930.159 of the regulations, or used for exempt purposes (and obtaining 
    diversion credit) under section 930.62 of the order and section 930.162 
    of the regulations. The regulated Districts for this season are: 
    District one--Northern Michigan; District two--Central Michigan; 
    District three--Southwest Michigan; District four--New York; and 
    District seven--Utah. Districts five, six, eight and nine (Oregon, 
    Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin, respectively) would not be 
    regulated for the 1998-99 season.
        The order prescribes under section 930.52 that upon adoption of the 
    order, those districts to be regulated shall be those districts in 
    which the average annual production of cherries over the prior three 
    years has exceeded 15 million pounds. A district not meeting the 15 
    million pound requirement shall not be regulated in such crop year. 
    Therefore, for this season, handlers in the districts of Oregon, 
    Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin would not be subject to volume 
    regulation. They were also not subject to volume regulation during the 
    last season.
        Section 930.50(a) of the order describes procedures for computing 
    an optimum supply for each crop year. The Board must meet on or about 
    July 1 of each crop year, to review sales data, inventory data, current 
    crop forecasts and market conditions. The optimum supply volume shall 
    be calculated as 100 percent of the average sales of the prior three 
    years to which is added a desirable carryout inventory not to exceed 20 
    million pounds or such other amount as may be established with the 
    approval of the Secretary. The optimum supply represents the desirable 
    volume of tart cherries that should be available for sale in the coming 
    crop year.
        The order also provides that on or about July 1 of each crop year, 
    the Board is required to establish preliminary free and restricted 
    percentages. These percentages are computed by deducting the carryin 
    inventory from the optimum supply figure (adjusted to raw product 
    equivalent--the actual weight of cherries handled to process into 
    cherry products) and dividing that figure by the current year's USDA 
    crop forecast. The carryin inventory figure reflects the amount of 
    cherries that handlers actually have in inventory. If the resulting 
    quotient is 100 percent or more, the Board should establish a 
    preliminary free market tonnage percentage of 100 percent. If the 
    quotient is less than 100 percent, the Board should establish a 
    preliminary free market tonnage percentage equivalent to the quotient, 
    rounded to the nearest whole percent, with the complement being the 
    preliminary restricted percentage.
        The Board met on June 18-19, 1998, and computed, for the 1998-99 
    crop year, an optimum supply of 287.4 million pounds. The Board 
    recommended that the carryout figure be zero pounds. Carryout is the 
    amount of fruit required to be carried into the succeeding crop year 
    and is set by the Board after considering market circumstances and 
    needs. This figure can range from zero to a maximum of 20 million 
    pounds. The Board calculated preliminary free and restricted 
    percentages as follows: The USDA estimate of the crop was 292.5 million 
    pounds; a 46 million pound carryin added to that equaled a total 
    available supply of 338.5 million pounds. The carryin figure reflects 
    the amount of cherries that handlers actually have in inventory. The 
    optimum supply was subtracted from the total estimated available supply 
    resulting in a surplus of 51.1 million pounds of tart cherries. An 
    adjustment for changed economic conditions of 37.0 million pounds was 
    added to the surplus, pursuant to section 930.50 of the order. This 
    adjustment is discussed later in this document. After the adjustment, 
    the resulting total surplus is 88.1 million pounds of tart cherries. 
    The total surplus 88.1 million pounds is a correction to a proposed 
    rule published November 18, 1998 (63 FR 64008) which incorrectly stated 
    the resulting total surplus for 1998-99 at 125.1 million pounds. The 
    surplus was divided by the production in the regulated districts (258 
    million pounds) and resulted in 66 percent free and 34 percent 
    restricted for the 1998-99 crop year. The Board recommended these 
    percentages by a 15 to 2 vote, with one abstention. Those Board members 
    voting against the recommendation disagreed with the computation of the 
    carryin figure because they thought that the figure should also include 
    the amount in the inventory reserve. Record evidence received during 
    the promulgation of the order indicated that the carryin figure 
    reflects the amount of cherries that handlers actually have in 
    inventory (not in the primary or secondary reserve). The Board 
    recommended the percentages and announced them to the industry as 
    required by the order.
        The preliminary percentages were based on the USDA production 
    estimate and the following supply and demand information for the 1998-
    99 crop year:
    
    [[Page 389]]
    
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Millions of
                                                                  pounds
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Optimum Supply Formula
     
    (1) Average sales of the prior three years.............            287.4
    (2) Less carryout......................................              0
    (3) Optimum Supply calculated by the Board at the June
     meeting...............................................            287.4
     
                    Preliminary Percentages
     
    (4) Less carryin as of July 1, 1998....................             46.0
    (5) Tonnage requirement for current crop year..........            241.4
    (6) USDA crop estimate.................................            292.5
    (7) Surplus (item 6 minus item 5)......................             51.1
    (8) Economic adjustment to surplus.....................             37.0
    (9) Adjusted surplus (item 7 plus item 8)..............             88.1
    (10) USDA crop estimate for regulated districts........            258.0
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Percentages                     Free         Restricted
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (11) Preliminary percentages (item 9
     divided by item 10)  x  100............              66              34
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Between July 1 and September 15 of each crop year, the Board may 
    modify the preliminary free and restricted percentages by announcing 
    interim free and restricted percentages to adjust to the actual pack 
    occurring in the industry.
        Section 930.50(d) of the order requires the Board to meet no later 
    than September 15 to recommend final free and restricted percentages to 
    the Secretary for approval. The Board met on September 10-11, 1998, and 
    recommended final free and restricted percentages of 60 and 40, 
    respectively. The Board recommended that the interim percentages and 
    final percentages be the same percentages. At that time, the Board had 
    available actual production amounts to review and made the necessary 
    adjustments to the percentages.
        The Secretary establishes final free and restricted percentages 
    through an informal rulemaking process. These percentages would make 
    available the tart cherries necessary to achieve the optimum supply 
    figure calculated earlier by the industry. The difference between any 
    final free market tonnage percentage designated by the Secretary and 
    100 percent is the final restricted percentage.
        The Board used a revised optimum supply figure for its final free 
    and restricted percentage calculations. The figure is 288.6 million 
    pounds instead of the 287.4 million pound figure used in June. This is 
    because the 3-year average sales figure used at the June meeting by 
    necessity required an estimate of June 1998 sales. The 3-year average 
    sales figure used in the final calculations reflects actual sales 
    through the 1997-98 crop year.
        The optimum supply, therefore is 288.6 million pounds. The actual 
    production recorded by the Board was 339.9 million pounds, which is a 
    47.4 million pound increase from the USDA crop estimate of 292.5 
    million pounds. The increase in the crop is due to very favorable 
    growing conditions in portions of the State of Michigan this season. 
    For the current crop year, 305.3 million pounds of tart cherries were 
    produced in the regulated districts.
        A 38.8 million pound carryin (actual carryin as opposed to the 46 
    million pounds originally estimated) was subtracted from the optimum 
    supply of 288.6 million pounds, which yields a tonnage requirement for 
    the current crop year of 249.8 million pounds. Subtracted from the 
    actual production in all districts of 339.9 million pounds reported by 
    the Board is the tonnage required for the current crop year (249.8 
    million pounds) which results in a 90.1 million pound surplus. An 
    adjustment for changed economic conditions of 31.4 million pounds was 
    added to the surplus, pursuant to section 930.50 of the order. This 
    adjustment is discussed later in this document. After the adjustment, 
    the resulting total surplus is 121.5 million pounds of tart cherries. 
    The total surplus of 121.5 million pounds is divided by the 305.3 
    million pound volume of tart cherries produced in the regulated 
    districts. This results in a 40 percent restricted percentage and a 
    corresponding 60 percent free percentage for the regulated districts.
        The final percentages are based on the Board's reported production 
    figures and the following supply and demand information for the 1998-99 
    crop year:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Millions of
                                                                  pounds
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Optimum Supply Formula
     
    (1) Average sales of the prior three years.............            288.6
    (2) Less carryout......................................              0
    (3) Optimum Supply calculated by the Board at the
     September meeting.....................................            288.6
     
                       Final Percentages
     
    (4) Less carryin as of July 1, 1998....................             38.8
    (5) Tonnage required current crop year.................            249.8
    (6) Board reported production..........................            339.9
    (7) Surplus (item 6 minus item 5)......................             90.1
    (8) Economic adjustment to surplus.....................             31.4
    (9) Adjusted surplus (item 7 plus item 8)..............            121.5
    (10) Production in regulated districts.................            305.3
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [[Page 390]]
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Percentages                     Free         Restricted
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (11) Final Percentages (item 9 divided
     by item 10)  x  100....................              60              40
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        As previously mentioned, the Board recommended an economic 
    adjustment be made in computing both the preliminary and final 
    percentages for the 1998-99 crop year. This is authorized under section 
    930.50. These subsections provide that in its deliberations of volume 
    regulation recommendations, the Board consider, among other things, the 
    expected demand conditions for cherries in different market segments 
    and an analysis of economic factors having bearing on the marketing 
    cherries. Based on these considerations, the Board may modify its 
    marketing policy calculations to reflect changes in economic 
    conditions.
        The order provides that the 3-year average of all sales be used in 
    determining the optimum supply of cherries. In recent seasons, however, 
    sales to export markets have risen dramatically. In 1997, export sales 
    of 61.1 million pounds were 379 percent of 1994 sales (16.1 million 
    pounds). The increase in export sales to those destinations exempt from 
    volume regulation (countries other than Canada, Japan, and Mexico) was 
    even greater, rising from 12.2 million pounds to 48.7 million pounds. 
    Export sales to countries other than Canada, Japan and Mexico were 
    exempt from volume regulations as a way for the tart cherry industry to 
    find and expand new markets for their products. Including this volume 
    of sales in the optimum supply formula, however, results in an 
    overestimate of the volume of tart cherries that can be profitably 
    marketed in unrestricted markets. Thus, the Board recommended adjusting 
    its estimate of surplus cherries by adding exempt export sales.
        By recommending this marketing policy modification, the Board 
    believes that it will provide stability to the marketplace and the 
    industry will be in a better situation for future years since new 
    markets will have been developed. Board members were of the opinion 
    that, if this adjustment is not made, growers could be paid less than 
    their production costs, because handlers would suffer financial losses 
    that would probably be passed on. Handlers would have to meet their 
    reserve obligations by other means. In addition, the value of cherries 
    already in inventory could be depressed due to the overabundant supply 
    of available cherries, a result inconsistent with the intent of the 
    order and the Act.
        The Department's ``Guidelines for Fruit, Vegetable, and Specialty 
    Crop Marketing Orders'' specify that 110 percent of recent years' sales 
    should be made available to primary markets each season before 
    recommendations for volume regulation are approved. This goal would be 
    met by the establishment of a preliminary percentage which releases 100 
    percent of the optimum supply and the additional release of tart 
    cherries provided under section 930.50(g). This release of tonnage, 
    equal to 10 percent of the average sales of the prior three years 
    sales, is made available to handlers each season. The Board recommended 
    that such release shall be made available to handlers the first week of 
    December and the first week of May. Handlers can decide how much of the 
    10 percent release they would like to receive during the December and 
    May release dates. Once released, such cherries are released for free 
    use by such handler. Approximately 29 million pounds would be made 
    available to handlers this season in accordance with Department 
    Guidelines. This release would be made available to every handler and 
    released to such handler in proportion to its percentage of the total 
    regulated crop handled. If such handler does not take such handler's 
    proportionate amount, such amount shall remain in the inventory 
    reserve.
    
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Effects on Small Businesses
    
        The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities and has prepared this 
    final regulatory flexibility analysis. The Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (RFA) would allow AMS to certify that regulations do not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    However, as a matter of general policy, AMS' Fruit and Vegetable 
    Programs (Programs) no longer opt for such certification, but rather 
    perform regulatory flexibility analyses for any rulemaking that would 
    generate the interest of a significant number of small entities. 
    Performing such analyses shifts the Programs' efforts from determining 
    whether regulatory flexibility analyses are required to the 
    consideration of regulatory options and economic or regulatory impacts.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 40 handlers of tart cherries who are 
    subject to regulation under the tart cherry marketing order and 
    approximately 1,400 producers of tart cherries in the regulated area. 
    Small agricultural service firms, which includes handlers, have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small agricultural 
    producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than 
    $500,000.
        Board and subcommittee meetings are widely publicized in advance 
    and are held in a location central to the production area. The meetings 
    are open to all industry members (including small business entities) 
    and other interested persons--who are encouraged to participate in the 
    deliberations and voice their opinions on topics under discussion. 
    Thus, Board recommendations can be considered to represent the 
    interests of small business entities in the industry.
        The principal demand for tart cherries is in the form of processed 
    products. Tart cherries are dried, frozen, canned, juiced and pureed. 
    During the period 1993/94 through 1997/98, approximately 89 percent of 
    the U.S. tart cherry crop, or 281.1 million pounds, was processed 
    annually. Of the 281.1 million pounds of tart cherries processed, 63 
    percent was frozen, 25 percent canned and 4 percent utilized for juice. 
    The remaining 8 percent was dried or assembled into juice packs.
        Based on National Agricultural Statistics Service data, acreage in 
    the United States devoted to tart cherry production has been trending 
    downward. In the ten-year period, 1987/88 through 1997/98, tart cherry 
    area decreased from 50,050 acres, to less than 40,000 acres. In 1997/
    98, approximately 88 percent of domestic tart cherry acreage is located 
    in four States: Michigan, New York, Utah and
    
    [[Page 391]]
    
    Wisconsin. Michigan leads the nation in tart cherry acreage with 67 
    percent of the total. Michigan produces about 78 percent of the U.S. 
    tart cherry crop each year. In 1997/98, tart cherry acreage in Michigan 
    decreased to 26,800 from 27,300 in the previous year.
        In crop years 1987/88 through 1997/98, tart cherry production 
    ranged from a high of 359 million pounds in 1987/88 to a low of 189.9 
    million pounds in 1991/92. The price per pound to tart cherry growers 
    ranged from a low of 7.3 cents in 1987 to a high of 46.4 cents in 1991. 
    These problems of wide supply and price fluctuation in the tart cherry 
    industry are national in scope and impact. Growers testified during the 
    order promulgation process that the prices which they received often 
    did not come close to covering the costs of production. They also 
    testified that production costs for most growers range between 20 and 
    22 cents per pound, which is well above average prices received during 
    1993-1995.
        The industry has demonstrated a need for an order during the 
    promulgation process of the marketing order because large variations in 
    annual tart cherry supplies tend to lead to fluctuations in prices and 
    disorderly marketing. As a result of these fluctuations in supply and 
    price, growers realize less income. The industry chose a volume control 
    marketing order to even out these wide variations in supply and improve 
    returns to growers. During the promulgation process, proponents 
    testified that small growers and processors would have the most to gain 
    from implementation of a marketing order because many such growers and 
    handlers had been going out of business due to low tart cherry prices. 
    They also testified that, since an order would help increase grower 
    returns, this should increase the buffer between business success and 
    failure because small growers and handlers tend to be less capitalized 
    than larger growers and handlers.
        In discussing the possibility of marketing percentages for the 
    1998-99 crop year, the Board considered the following factors contained 
    in the marketing policy: (1) the estimated total production of tart 
    cherries; (2) the estimated size of the crop to be handled; (3) the 
    expected general quality of such cherry production; (4) the expected 
    carryover as of July 1 of canned and frozen cherries and other cherry 
    products; (5) the expected demand conditions for cherries in different 
    market segments; (6) supplies of competing commodities; (7) an analysis 
    of economic factors having a bearing on the marketing of cherries; (8) 
    the estimated tonnage held by handlers in primary or secondary 
    inventory reserves; and (9) any estimated release of primary or 
    secondary inventory reserve cherries during the crop year.
        The Board's review of the factors resulted in the computation and 
    announcement in June 1998 of preliminary free and restricted 
    percentages and in the final and free and restricted percentages 
    established in this rule (60 percent free and 40 percent restricted).
        The Board discussed the demand for tart cherries is inelastic at 
    high and low levels of production. At the extremes, different factors 
    become operational. The order's promulgation record stated that in very 
    short crops there is limited but sufficient exclusive demand for 
    cherries that can cause processor prices to double and grower prices to 
    triple. In the event of large crops, there seems to be no price low 
    enough to expand tart cherry sales in the marketplace sufficient to 
    market the crops.
        In considering alternatives, the Board discussed not having volume 
    regulation this season. Board members stated that no volume regulation 
    would be detrimental to the tart cherry industry. Returns to growers 
    would not even cover their production costs for this season.
        The Board discussed the fact that the general quality of the crop 
    for this season is fair to good. Alternative products used by food 
    processing and preparation establishments instead of cherries are 
    apples and blueberries which can be substituted for cherries if 
    cherries cannot be sold at consistent prices.
        As mentioned earlier, the Department's ``Guidelines for Fruit, 
    Vegetable, and Specialty Crop Marketing Orders'' specify that 110 
    percent of recent years' sales should be made available to primary 
    markets each season before recommendations for volume regulation are 
    approved. The quantity available under this rule is 110 percent of the 
    quantity shipped in the prior three years.
        The free and restricted percentages proposed to be established by 
    this rule release the optimum supply and apply uniformly to all 
    regulated handlers in the industry, regardless of size. There are no 
    known additional costs incurred by small handlers that are not incurred 
    by large handlers. The stabilizing effects of the percentages impact 
    all handlers positively by helping them maintain and expand markets, 
    despite seasonal supply fluctuations. Likewise, price stability 
    positively impacts all producers by allowing them to better anticipate 
    the revenues their tart cherries will generate.
        While the level of benefits of this rulemaking is difficult to 
    quantify, the stabilizing effects of the volume regulations impact both 
    small and large handlers positively by helping them maintain markets 
    even though tart cherry supplies fluctuate widely from season to 
    season.
        In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
    regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the information collection and 
    recordkeeping requirements have been previously approved by OMB and 
    assigned OMB Number 0581-0177.
        There are some reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance 
    requirements under the marketing order. The reporting and recordkeeping 
    burdens are necessary for compliance purposes and for developing 
    statistical data for maintenance of the program. The forms require 
    information which is readily available from handler records and which 
    can be provided without data processing equipment or trained 
    statistical staff. As with other, similar marketing order programs, 
    reports and forms are periodically studied to reduce or eliminate 
    duplicate information collection burdens by industry and public sector 
    agencies. This rule does not change those requirements.
        The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
    duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this regulation.
        A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
    Register on Wednesday, November 18, 1998 (63 FR 64008). Copies of the 
    rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile to all Board members and 
    cherry handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the 
    Internet by the Office of the Federal Register.
        A 15-day comment period was provided to allow interested persons to 
    respond to the proposal. Fifteen days was deemed appropriate because a 
    rule finalizing the action would need to be in place as soon as 
    possible since handlers are currently marketing 1998-99 cherries. No 
    comments were received during the comment period.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective
    
    [[Page 392]]
    
    date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal 
    Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already shipping cherries 
    from the 1997-98 crop and need to know the final percentages as soon as 
    possible. Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was 
    recommended in a public meeting. Also, a 15-day comment period was 
    provided for in the proposed rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 930
    
        Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Tart cherries.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 930 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 930--TART CHERRIES GROWN IN THE STATES OF MICHIGAN, NEW YORK, 
    PENNSYLVANIA, OREGON, UTAH, WASHINGTON, AND WISCONSIN
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 930 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. Section 930.251 is added to Subpart--Supplementary Regulations 
    to read as follows:
    
        Note: This section will not appear in the annual Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
    
    Sec. 930.251  Final free and restricted percentages for the 1998-99 
    crop year.
    
        The final percentages for tart cherries handled by handlers during 
    the crop year beginning on July 1, 1998, which shall be free and 
    restricted, respectively, are designated as follows: Free percentage, 
    60 percent and restricted percentage, 40 percent.
    
        Dated: December 28, 1998.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 99-33 Filed 1-4-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/05/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-33
Dates:
January 6, 1999 through June 30, 1999, and applies to all tart cherries handled from the beginning of the 1998-99 crop year.
Pages:
387-392 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV98-930-1 FR
PDF File:
99-33.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 930.251