[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 682-688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-234]
[[Page 681]]
Part VI
Department of Commerce
_______________________________________________________________________
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
_______________________________________________________________________
Technology Opportunities Program (formerly known as the
Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program);
Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 3, Wednesday, January 5, 2000 /
Notices
[[Page 682]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
DOCKET NUMBER: [981203295-9313-03; CFDA 11.552]
RIN 0660-ZA06
Technology Opportunities Program (formerly known as the
Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program)
AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Funds.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
(NTIA) issues this Notice describing the conditions under which
applications will be received under the Technology Opportunities
Program (TOP) and how NTIA will determine which applications it will
fund. 1 TOP promotes the widespread use and availability of
advanced telecommunications and information technologies in the public
and non-profit sectors. By providing matching grants for information
infrastructure projects, this program will help develop a nationwide,
interactive, broadband information infrastructure that is accessible to
all Americans, in rural as well as urban areas.
\1\ Please note that TOP was formerly known as the
Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program
(TIIAP).
DATES: Complete applications for the Fiscal Year 2000 TOP grant program
must be mailed or hand-carried to the address indicated below and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
received by NTIA no later than 9:00 p.m. EST, March 16, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Applications must be mailed to: Technology Opportunities
Program National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S.
Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW HCHB, Room 4092,
Washington, D.C. 20230.
or-hand-delivered to:
Technology Opportunities Program, National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 1874,
Herbert Clark Hoover Building 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
D.C. 20230.
Room 1874 is located at entrance #10 on 15th Street NW, between
Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Stephen J. Downs, Director of the Technology Opportunities Program.
Telephone: 202/482-2048; fax: 202/501-5136; e-mail: top@ntia.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program Purposes
NTIA announces the seventh annual round of a competitive matching
grant program, the Technology Opportunities Program (TOP). TOP promotes
the development, widespread availability, and use of advanced
telecommunications and information technologies to serve the public
interest.
To accomplish this objective, TOP will provide matching grants to
state, local, and tribal governments; 2 non-profit
community-based organizations; non-profit health care providers and
public health institutions; schools; libraries; museums; colleges;
universities; public safety providers; and other non-profit entities.
TOP will support projects that improve the quality of, and the public's
access to, cultural, educational, and training resources; reduce the
cost, improve the quality, and/or increase the accessibility of health
care and public health services; promote responsive public safety
services; improve the effectiveness and efficiency of government and
public services; and foster communication, resource-sharing, and
economic development within communities, both rural and urban.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ American Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority
Title II of the Commerce, Justice, and State Appropriations Act for
Fiscal Year 2000, Incorporated by Reference in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act for FY 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-113, ``Division B,
Section 1000(a)(1).''
Funding Availability
Approximately $12.5 million is available for federal assistance. A
small amount of funds that have been deobligated from grants awarded in
previous fiscal years may also be available for Fiscal Year 2000
grants. Based on past experience, NTIA expects this year's grant round
to be very competitive. In Fiscal Year 1999, NTIA received over 700
applications collectively requesting more than $250 million in grant
funds. From these applications, the Department of Commerce announced 43
awards totaling $17.6 million in federal funds.
An applicant may request up to $600,000 in total federal support.
Based on previous grant rounds, TOP anticipates that the average size
of a grant award will be approximately $375,000 with a grant period
lasting between two and three years.
Eligible Organizations
Non-profit entities; state, local, and tribal governments; and
colleges and universities are eligible to apply. Although individuals
and for-profit organizations are not eligible to apply, they are
encouraged to participate as project partners.
Matching Funds Requirements
Grant recipients under this program will be required to provide
matching funds toward the total project cost. Applicants must document
their capacity to provide matching funds. Matching funds may be in the
form of cash or in-kind contributions. Grant funds under this program
are usually released in direct proportion to local matching funds
utilized and documented as having been expended. NTIA will provide up
to 50 percent of the total project cost, unless the applicant can
document extraordinary circumstances warranting a grant of up to 75
percent.
Generally, federal funds may not be used as matching funds, except
as provided by federal statute. If you plan to use funds from a federal
agency, you should contact the federal agency that administers the
funds in question and obtain documentation from that agency's Office of
General Counsel to support the use of federal funds for matching
purposes.
Completeness of Application
TOP will initially review all applications to determine whether all
required elements are present and clearly identifiable. The required
elements are listed and described in the Guidelines for Preparing
Applications--Fiscal Year 2000. Each of the required elements must be
present and clearly identified. Failure to do so may result in
rejection of the application.
Application Deadline
As noted above, complete applications for the Fiscal Year 2000 TOP
grant program must be received by NTIA no later than 9:00 P.M. EST,
March 16, 2000. A postmark date is not sufficient. Applications which
have been provided to a delivery service on or before March 15, 2000,
with ``delivery guaranteed'' before 9:00 P.M. on March 16, 2000, will
be accepted for review if the applicant can document that the
application was provided to the delivery service with delivery to the
address listed above guaranteed prior to the closing date and time.
Applications will not be accepted via facsimile
[[Page 683]]
machine transmission or electronic mail. NTIA anticipates that it will
take approximately six months to complete the review of applications
and make final funding decisions.
Program Funding Priorities
NTIA supports innovative and exemplary projects that can serve as
models for using information infrastructure in the public and non-
profit sectors and thereby contribute to the development of an
advanced, nationwide network that will ultimately offer broadband
communication services to all.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Information infrastructure'' includes telecommunication
networks, computers, other end-user devices, software, standards,
and skills that collectively enable people to connect to each other
and to a vast array of services and information resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NTIA believes that every project supported under TOP should be a
nationally significant demonstration of how telecommunications and
information technologies can be used to extend valuable services and
opportunities to all Americans, especially the underserved.4
In addition, the development of an advanced information infrastructure
accessible by all depends upon the contribution of a wide variety of
skills, ideas, and perspectives. Therefore, TOP-supported projects
should, to the greatest degree possible, reach out to all members of a
community and catalyze partnerships to help reduce the digital
divide.5 Because important networking efforts may also occur
outside of the United States, TOP projects may benefit from linkages to
international efforts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Underserved'' refers to individuals and communities that
are subject to barriers that limit or prevent their access to the
benefits of network technologies or vital services. These barriers
may be technological, geographic, economic, physical, linguistic, or
cultural.
\5\ More details on the growing gap in access to
telecommunications and information technology in America can be
found in NTIA's report, Falling through the Net: Defining the
Digital Divide. This report is available on the Internet at NTIA's
home page, http://www.ntia.doc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOP defines innovation broadly. It can encompass, but is not
restricted to, a demonstration of broadband or other cutting edge
technologies, a new application of proven technologies, a creative
strategy for overcoming traditional barriers to access, a new
configuration of existing information resources, or the use of network
technologies in a unique setting.
NTIA also expects each TOP project to serve as a national model and
offer new and practical insights into the use of network technologies.
TOP emphasizes the application of technology to meet people's needs,
and not simply on the technology as an end in itself. Therefore, each
project should identify specific problems or needs in a community, use
network technologies to offer concrete solutions, and produce
measurable outcomes.
A TOP project is more than simply adding technology to address a
problem, or incrementally modify an existing process. Projects are
expected to apply technology creatively and, in so doing, bring about
meaningful changes in how services are provided and in the
relationships between an organization and its partners and clients.
For FY 2000, TOP is especially interested in projects developed by
smaller, locally-based organizations that both serve and represent
underserved communities across the nation. For example, these
organizations may include but are not limited to: community-based
organizations; small non-profits; colleges and universities serving
rural communities; Minority Serving Institutions; and organizations
representing Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities.6
TOP wants to build the capacity of organizations that work closely with
underserved communities. These non-profits often are able to understand
the local dynamics that are helpful in defining the problems and
creating community-driven, successful solutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Minority Serving Institutions include Historically Black
Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, and Tribal
Colleges and Universities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the FY 2000 grant competition, TOP is also especially
interested in projects that propose to use advanced network
technologies to enhance the quality and efficiency of services
delivered through non-profit organizations. Driven by research efforts
in the private sector, academia, and the federal government,
technological advances promise to improve significantly the quality of
today's networks. For example, broadband networks will afford the
opportunity to deliver immense amounts of data quickly to the desktop,
and emerging wireless networks will give end users greater flexibility
in how and when they can access information. TOP encourages applicants
to explore creatively the potential of these and other advanced
technologies.
In previous fiscal years, NTIA supported planning projects whose
primary goal was to develop strategies for the development of
information infrastructure applications. Due to the limited amount of
funds available to the program, the emphasis for Fiscal Year 2000 is on
projects that deploy, use, and evaluate the use of information
infrastructure applications. NTIA will, however, support projects that
incorporate some planning activities as part of the proposed project.
In FY 2000, TOP will support projects in four application areas:
Community Networking and Services, Lifelong Learning and the Arts,
Health, and Public Safety.7 Each application will be
reviewed with other applications in the same area. TOP is especially
interested in projects that cut across application areas to better
serve the needs of individuals and communities. Because multiple
organizations often share the same end users, TOP encourages
applications in which the use of network technology enables partners in
different disciplines (e.g., health, education, and public safety) to
share information. For example, local government and community-based
organizations that work to serve the same families could benefit by
increasing coordination and information sharing through the use of
network technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Please note that this year, TOP has combined the FY 1999
application areas of Community Networking and Public Services into a
single application area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The four application areas are described below.
Community Networking and Services
Community Networking and Services encompasses Community Networking
and Public Services which, in previous years, constituted separate
application areas.
Projects in this area provide innovative approaches to strengthen
communities, deliver services to people in need, and address the needs
of special communities, such as seniors or individuals with
disabilities. Community Networking and Services focuses on an array of
projects that enable a broad range of community residents and
organizations to communicate and share information; to improve the
delivery of vital social and administrative services to individuals
with a range of needs; to enhance economic and community development
through the coordination, delivery, and redefinition of vital services;
and to participate in civic activities.
Examples of Community Networking and Services projects may include,
but would not be limited to: community information systems that allow
end users to draw upon an expanding variety of information resources
and customize the output to meet specific goals; online mechanisms for
social services delivery that allow multiple
[[Page 684]]
stakeholder organizations to link services, where appropriate, and
thereby reduce overall administrative burdens on themselves and their
clients; innovative access models that create mechanisms for reaching
out to populations whose access to information tools may have been
limited, or prevented, by geographic barriers, economic distress,
linguistic or acculturation problems, age, or simple distance; economic
development models that use information technologies to promote self-
sufficiency among individuals and families and or employ emerging
technologies to capture and share demographic and/or environmental
information to allow community groups and individuals to devise
creative strategies for economic revitalization.
Lifelong Learning and the Arts
Projects in this area seek to improve education and training for
learners of all ages and provide cultural enrichment through the use of
information infrastructure in both traditional and non-traditional
settings. While TOP will continue to support a full range of projects
in the Lifelong Learning and the Arts application area, this year TOP
is particularly interested in projects which use network-based
technology to deliver training and instruction to lifelong learners in
non-traditional settings such as homes, community centers, and
workplaces.
Examples of Lifelong Learning and the Arts projects may include,
but would not be limited to: projects that explore creative
partnerships among schools, libraries, museums, colleges, or
universities to deliver network-based learning resources; projects
linking workplaces and job-training sites to educational institutions;
projects that enrich communities by delivering on-line informational,
educational, and cultural services from public libraries, museums, and
other cultural centers; and projects that allow users to collaborate in
the creation of cultural works or participate actively in meaningful
on-line learning exchanges.
Health
Projects in this area involve the use of information infrastructure
in the delivery of health care and public health services.
Examples of Health projects may include, but would not be limited
to: systems that improve the social and medical models of care to
consumers in their place of residence; telemedicine systems that offer
integrated approaches to extending and integrating medical and dental
expertise to rural or underserved urban areas or non-traditional
settings; projects designed to improve communication, collaboration and
knowledge among and between health care providers and patients to
empower consumers to participate jointly in their health care; projects
to improve access and timeliness of care for those in emergency
situations and explore various methods to extend services beyond the
emergency room; projects that integrate technology to assess community
needs and develop innovative health technology models of care delivery
across the care continuum; projects that integrate triage mechanisms
into improving care delivery for the uninsured, under insured, and low
income populations; and networks or information services aimed at
disease prevention and health promotion.
Public Safety
Projects in this area will seek to increase the effectiveness of
law enforcement agencies, the court system, emergency, rescue, and fire
departments, or other entities involved in providing safety services
that respond to, prevent, or intervene in crises.
Examples of Public Safety projects may include, but would not be
limited to: projects that facilitate information exchange among public
safety agencies located in single or multiple geographic areas to
increase efficiency and share resources, including spectrum resources;
projects that provide information in a timely manner to ``first-
response officials'' and assist agencies in on-the-spot situation
analysis; projects that advance the capabilities of public safety
agencies to identify individuals involved in incidents; applications
that reduce risks to responding units and the public; projects that
help public safety agencies provide community outreach services; and
projects that aim to increase the safety and security of children and
reduce domestic violence.
Limitations on Project Scope
Projects funded by TOP must meet the Program Funding Priorities
described in this Notice. Projects must involve innovative approaches
to the delivery of useful, practical services in real-world
environments within the grant award period. Listed below are types of
projects TOP will not support in Fiscal Year 2000.
(1) One-Way Networks. TOP will not support construction or
extensions of one-way networks, that is, networks that deliver
information to a passive audience; all networks and services proposed
for TOP support must be interactive.8 For example, TOP will
not fund one-way broadcast systems, tape duplication and/or delivery
projects, or any project that does not permit the end user in some
fashion to select the information he or she will receive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Interactivity'' is defined as the capacity of a
communications system to allow end users to communicate directly
with other users, either in real time (as in a video teleconference)
or on a store-and-forward basis (as with electronic mail), or to
seek and gain access to information on an on-demand basis, as
opposed to a broadcast basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Single-Organization Projects. TOP will not support projects
whose primary emphasis is on the internal communications needs of a
single organization, even if the organization has a considerable number
of offices in different cities or regions of the country. For example,
TOP will not consider projects that create or expand Local Area
Networks or internal e-mail systems whose end users are principally, or
exclusively, staff members of a single organization. However, TOP will
support applications that extend communications among multiple
organizations and agencies within a governmental jurisdiction. Projects
should, to the maximum degree feasible, include appropriate
partnerships, with plans for inter-organizational communications among
the partners.
(3) Replacement or Upgrade of Existing Facilities. TOP will not
support any projects whose purpose is to upgrade or replace existing
systems, add workstations or servers to existing networks, or complete
the installation of a network.
In addition, TOP will not support projects whose primary purpose is
to develop content, hardware, or software, to provide training on the
use of the information infrastructure, or to build voice-based systems.
(1) Content Development Projects. Many projects necessarily involve
some modification or development of content.9 Therefore, TOP
will support projects in which the creation or conversion of content is
part of a larger effort to utilize information infrastructure
technologies to address real-world problems. However, TOP will not
support projects whose primary purpose is to develop data resources, or
in any other way produce information content. For example, TOP will not
consider projects which are designed only to develop curriculum, create
databases, convert existing paper-based information to a digital
format, digitize
[[Page 685]]
existing graphics collections, or establish World Wide Web sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ ``Content development'' refers to the creation of
information resources, such as databases or World Wide Web sites,
for the purpose of dissemination through one or more on-line
services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Hardware or Software Development Projects. Some projects may
require limited software development or the customization or
modification of existing software or hardware in order to meet
particular end-user requirements or to enable the exchange of
information across networks. However, the creation of a software or
hardware product cannot be a project's primary purpose.
(3) Training Projects. While TOP does consider training to be an
essential aspect of most implementation projects, TOP will not support
projects whose primary purpose is to provide training in the use of
software applications, Internet use, or other use of information
infrastructure.
(4) Voice-based Systems. Two-way, interactive voice networks are an
important element of the existing information infrastructure. Voice as
a means for conveying information and voice input tools play critical
roles in ensuring people with disabilities have access to network
technology. However, TOP will not support projects whose primary
purpose is to either build or install voice-based communication
networks such as call centers, two-way radio networks, or 800 MHz radio
systems.
Review Criteria
Reviewers will review and rate each application using the following
criteria. The relative weights of each criterion are identified in
parentheses.
1. Project Purpose (15%)
Each application will be judged on the overall purpose of the
proposed project and its potential impact on a community. In assessing
the ``Project Purpose,'' reviewers will examine the degree to which the
applicant clearly: defines the problem(s) within the community to be
served and describes its severity; proposes creative and practical
means of addressing the community's problem(s) employing network
technologies; and identifies anticipated outcomes and potential impacts
that are both realistic and measurable. Reviewers will also assess the
degree to which an applicant convincingly links the three major
elements--problem(s), solution(s), and outcomes.
Reviewers will assess the degree to which the project targets
underserved communities and populations, and the degree to which the
proposed project will address the circumstances and levels of distress
(such as poverty, high unemployment, low educational achievement, high
crime rate, poor health status, etc.) they face.
2. Innovation (15%)
As noted in the section on ``Program Funding Priorities,''
reviewers will assess innovation broadly, examining both the technology
to be used and the application of technology in a particular setting,
to serve a particular population, or to solve a particular problem.
Reviewers will also assess the degree to which the project would bring
about new and practical changes in how the applicant provides services
and enhances relationships between its partners and clients.
When rating the degree to which an application demonstrates
innovation, reviewers will use their experience as experts in their
respective fields to determine whether a proposed project introduces a
unique or new approach and extends the state-of-the-art in a given
application area. Reviewers will examine each project in a national
context and ask: (1) how an application compares with, complements, or
improves upon other activities in a given application area, and (2)
what insight(s) a proposed project could add to what is known about
using network technologies in a given application area.
3. Diffusion Potential (15%)
The innovations and approaches to be demonstrated in any proposed
project should contain the potential to be diffused broadly throughout
the country. NTIA expects that each awarded project will serve as a
model for other communities to follow.
To assess this potential for diffusion, reviewers will consider
four factors:
(1) the degree to which the problem identified by the applicant is
common to many communities;
(2) the relative advantage of the project's innovations over
established approaches to addressing the specified problems;
(3) the ease of replication and adaptation, based on considerations
such as cost and complexity; and
(4) the applicant's plans to disseminate actively the knowledge
gained from the project's successes and failures.
4. Project Feasibility (15%)
In assessing the feasibility of each application, reviewers will
focus on four issues: the technical approach, the qualifications of the
project staff, the proposed budget and the implementation schedule, and
the applicant's plan for sustaining the project beyond the grant
period.
In assessing technical approach, reviewers will examine how the
proposed system would work, how it would operate with other systems,
technological alternatives that have been considered, designs for
system maintenance, periodic upgrades, and plans to adapt to unforeseen
developments. Applicants are expected to make use of existing
infrastructure and commercially available telecommunications services,
unless extraordinary circumstances require the construction of new
network facilities.
In assessing the qualifications of the project team, reviewers will
assess the applicant and its partners to determine if they have the
resources, expertise, and experience necessary to undertake, evaluate,
and complete the project and disseminate results within the proposed
period.
Reviewers will analyze the budget in terms of clarity and cost-
effectiveness. The proposed budget should be appropriate to the tasks
proposed and sufficiently detailed so that reviewers can easily
understand the relationship of items in the budget to the project
narrative. Reviewers also will assess the degree to which the
implementation process is comprehensive and reasonable.
Finally, reviewers will examine the potential long-term viability
of the applicant's plans. Reviewers will consider the economic
circumstances of the community or communities to be served by the
proposed project and the applicant's strategies to sustain the project
after the completion of the grant.
5. Community Involvement (15%)
Each application will be rated on the overall level of community
involvement in the development and implementation of the proposed
project. Reviewers will examine the breadth of community involvement to
ensure it includes the development of partnerships among unaffiliated
organizations, from the public, non-profit, or private sectors, as an
integral part of each project.10 TOP considers partners to
be organizations that supply cash or in-kind resources and/or play an
active role in the planning and implementation of the project.
Reviewers will:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ ``Unaffiliated'' organizations are institutions that do not
have formal associations or existing relationships with the
applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) examine the steps the applicant has taken to engage and sustain
the involvement of a variety of community stakeholders. Reviewers will
look for evidence of demand, from the community, the end users, and the
[[Page 686]]
potential beneficiaries, for the services proposed by the project;
(2) consider the degree of attention paid to the needs, skills,
working conditions, and living environments of the targeted end
users.11 Reviewers will also consider the extent to which
applicants involve representatives from a broad range of potential
users in both the design and implementation of the project and consider
the varying degrees of abilities of all end users, including
individuals with disabilities;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ An ``end user'' is one who customarily employs or seeks
access to, rather than provides, information infrastructure. An end
user may be a consumer of information (e.g., a member of the public
employing a touch-screen public access terminal); may be involved in
an interactive communication with other end users; or may use
information infrastructure to provide services to the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) assess the applicant's plans for training end users, upgrading
their skills, and building community awareness and knowledge of the
project;
(4) evaluate the steps applicants have taken to involve and
document the support of a variety of stakeholder groups and
organizations; and
(5) examine the applicant's efforts to safeguard the privacy of the
project's end users and beneficiaries.12 In circumstances
where proprietary or sensitive individual data are involved, reviewers
will closely examine the applicant's strategies for addressing the
privacy and confidentiality of user information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Project beneficiaries are those individuals or
organizations deriving benefits from a project's outcome(s). A
project beneficiary may also, but not necessarily, be a project end
user.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Reducing Disparities (15%)
Reviewers will assess the degree to which each application
addresses barriers which limit a community's or a group's access to the
information infrastructure. These barriers may be technological,
geographic, economic, physical, linguistic, or cultural. For example,
(1) a rural community may be geographically isolated from
information resources and lack local technical expertise to help
install and manage the network infrastructure;
(2) an inner city neighborhood may contain large numbers of
potential end users who lack the technical expertise and financial
resources to access the information infrastructure; or
(3) people with disabilities may need a variety of special hardware
or software interfaces to facilitate their use of the information
infrastructure.
Reviewers will assess evidence of community need in terms of access
to telecommunications and network resources and the applicant's
proposed strategies for overcoming barriers to the access and use of
information technologies. Reviewers will focus on the applicant's
strategies for reaching out to targeted groups and for tailoring
services which address the learning mechanisms, attitudes, abilities,
and customs of the community.
7. Evaluation and Documentation (10%)
Each application will be rated on its potential to evaluate and
document the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed solution(s)
and anticipated outcome(s) of the project.
Reviewers will assess the degree to which the evaluation links to
the overall formulation of project goals and objectives (i.e., the
problem, solution, and anticipated outcomes identified in the ``Project
Purpose'' section) and the Review Criteria treated below.
Applicants will be rated on the extent to which their documentation
plans include effective record keeping strategies that will assist in
the applicant's assessment of the project and facilitate future
evaluations of the applicant's efforts.
When examining an applicant's proposed evaluation efforts,
reviewers will assess the evaluation design, the implementation plan
for the evaluation, and the allocation of resources (i.e., budget,
staff, and management) for evaluation. Reviewers will also analyze the
evaluation questions; the methodological approach for answering the
evaluation questions; how data will be collected; and how the data will
be analyzed. Finally, reviewers will assess the qualifications of any
proposed evaluators.
Eligible Costs
Eligible Costs. Allowable costs incurred under approved projects
shall be determined in accordance with applicable federal cost
principles, i.e., OMB Circular A-21, A-87, A-122, or Appendix E of 45
C.F.R. Part 74. If included in the approved project budget, TOP will
allow costs for personnel; fringe benefits; computer hardware,
software, and other end-user equipment; telecommunication services and
related equipment; consultants, evaluators, and other contractual
services; travel; rental of office equipment, furniture, and space; and
supplies. All costs must be reasonable and directly related to the
project.
Indirect Costs. The total dollar amount of the indirect costs
proposed in an application under this program must not exceed the
indirect cost rate negotiated and approved by a cognizant federal
agency or 100 percent of the total proposed direct costs dollar amount
in the application, whichever is less.
Ineligible Costs
Costs associated with the construction or major renovation of
buildings are not eligible. While costs for the construction of new
network facilities are eligible costs, applicants are expected to make
use of existing infrastructure and commercially available
telecommunications services. Only under extraordinary circumstances
will the construction of new network facilities be approved. Costs of
the professional services, such as instruction, counseling, or medical
care, provided via a network supported through this program are not
eligible.
Note that costs that are ineligible for TOP support may not be
included as part of the applicant's matching fund contribution.
In addition, the Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2000 places
restrictions on eligible costs for applicants that are recipients of
Universal Service Fund discounts and applicants receiving assistance
from the Department of Justice's Regional Information Sharing Systems
Program as part of the project costs. This statute provides:
That notwithstanding any other provision of law, no entity that
receives telecommunications services at preferential rates under
section 254(h) of the Act (47 U.S.C. 254(h)) or receives assistance
under the regional information sharing systems grant program of the
Department of Justice under part M of title I of the Omnibus Crime
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796h) may use funds
under a grant under this heading to cover any costs of the entity that
would otherwise be covered by such preferential rates or such
assistance, as the case may be.13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Title II of the Commerce, Justice, and State Appropriations
Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Incorporated by Reference in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act for FY 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-113,
``Division B, Section 1000(a)(1).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, recipients of the above-described preferential rates
or assistance are prohibited from including any costs that would be
covered by such preferential rates or assistance in their proposed TOP
grant budget.
Award Period
Successful applicants will have between 12 and 36 months to
complete their projects. While the completion time will vary depending
on the complexity of the project, NTIA has found that most grant
recipients require at least two years to complete and fully evaluate
their projects. Accordingly,
[[Page 687]]
NTIA encourages applicants to propose projects that last two to three
years.
Selection Process
NTIA will publish a notice in the Federal Register listing all
applications received by TOP. Listing an application in such a notice
merely acknowledges receipt of an application that will compete for
funding with other applications. Publication does not preclude
subsequent return or disapproval of the application, nor does it ensure
that the application will be funded. The selection process will last
approximately six months and involves four stages:
(1) During the first stage, each eligible application will be
reviewed by a panel of outside readers, who have demonstrated expertise
in both the programmatic and technological aspects of the application.
The review panels will evaluate applications according to the review
criteria provided in this Notice and make non-binding written
recommendations to the program.
(2) Upon completion of the external review process, program staff
may analyze applications as necessary. Program staff analysis will be
based on the degree to which a proposed project meets the program's
funding scope as described in the section entitled ``Limitations on
Project Scope;'' the eligibility of costs and matching funds included
in an application's budget; and the extent to which an application
complements or duplicates projects previously funded or under
consideration by NTIA or other federal programs.14 The
analysis of program staff will be provided to the TOP Director in
writing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See discussion of ``Eligible Costs'' and ``Matching Funds
Requirements'' in this Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The TOP Director then prepares and presents a slate of recommended
grant awards to the Office of Telecommunications and Information
Applications' (OTIA) Associate Administrator for review and
approval.15 The Director's recommendations and the Associate
Administrator's review and approval will take into account the
following selection factors:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Office of Telecommunication and Information
Applications is the division of the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration that supervises NTIA's grant awards
programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. the evaluations of the outside reviewers;
2. the analysis of program staff;
3. the degree to which the proposed grants meet the program's
priorities as described in the section entitled ``Program Funding
Priorities;''
4. the geographic distribution of the proposed grant awards;
5. the variety of technologies and strategies employed by the
proposed grant awards;
6. the extent to which the proposed grant awards represent a
reasonable distribution of funds across application areas;
7. the promotion of access to and use of the information
infrastructure by rural communities and other underserved groups;
8. avoidance of redundancy and conflicts with the initiatives of
other federal agencies; and
9. the availability of funds.
(3) Upon approval by the OTIA Associate Administrator, the
Director's recommendations will then be presented to the Selecting
Official, the NTIA Administrator. The NTIA Administrator selects the
applications to be negotiated for possible grant award taking into
consideration the Director's recommendations and the degree to which
the slate of applications, taken as a whole, satisfies the selection
factors described above and the program's stated purposes as set forth
in the section entitled ``Program Purposes.''
(4) After applications have been selected in this manner,
negotiations will take place between TOP staff and the applicant. These
negotiations are intended to resolve any differences that exist between
the applicant's original request and what TOP proposes to fund, and if
necessary, to clarify items in the application. Not all applicants who
are contacted for negotiation will necessarily receive a TOP award.
Final selections made by the Administrator will be based upon the
recommendations by the Director and the OTIA Associate Administrator
and the degree to which the slate of applications, taken as a whole,
satisfies the program's stated purposes as set forth in the section
entitled ``Program Purposes,'' upon the conclusion of negotiations.
Use of Program Income
Applicants are advised that any program income generated by a
proposed project is subject to special conditions. Anticipated program
income must be documented appropriately in the project budget. In
addition, should an application be funded, unanticipated program income
must be reported to TOP, and the budget for the project must be
renegotiated to reflect receipt of this program income. Program income
means gross income earned by the recipient that is either directly
generated by a supported activity, or earned as a result of the award.
In addition, federal policy prohibits any recipient or subrecipient
receiving federal funds from the use of equipment acquired with these
funds to provide services to non-federal outside organizations for a
fee that is less than private companies charge for equivalent services.
This prohibition does not apply to services provided to outside
organizations at no cost.
Policy on Sectarian Activities
Applicants are advised that on December 22, 1995, NTIA issued a
notice in the Federal Register on its policy with regard to sectarian
activities. Under NTIA's policy, while religious activities cannot be
the essential thrust of a grant, an application will not be ineligible
where sectarian activities are only incidental or attenuated to the
overall project purpose for which funding is requested. Applicants for
whom this policy may be relevant should read the policy that was
published in the Federal Register at 60 FR 66491, Dec. 22, 1995.
Waiver Authority
It is the general intent of NTIA not to waive any of the provisions
set forth in this Notice. However, under extraordinary circumstances
and when it is in the best interest of the federal government, NTIA,
upon its own initiative or when requested, may waive the provisions in
this Notice. Waivers may only be granted for requirements that are
discretionary and not mandated by statute. Any request for a waiver
must set forth the extraordinary circumstances for the request and be
included in the application or sent to the address provided in the
Addresses section above. NTIA will not consider a request to waive the
application deadline for an application until the application has been
received.
Other Information
Electronic Information. Information about NTIA and TOP, including
this document and the Guidelines for Preparing Applications--Fiscal
Year 2000, can be retrieved electronically via the Internet using the
World Wide Web. Use http://www.ntia.doc.gov to reach the NTIA home page
and follow directions to ``Grants.'' TOP can also be reached via
electronic mail at [email protected]
Application Forms. Standard Forms 424 (OMB Approval Number 0348-
0044), Application for Federal Assistance; 424A (OMB Approval Number
0348-0043), Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs; and 424B
(OMB Approval Number 0348-0040), Assurances--Non-
[[Page 688]]
Construction Programs, (Rev 4-92), and other Department of Commerce
forms shall be used in applying for financial assistance. These forms
are included in the Guidelines for Preparing Applications--Fiscal Year
2000, which can be obtained by contacting NTIA by telephone, fax, or
electronic mail, as described in the ADDRESSES section above. TOP
requests one original and five copies of the application. Applicants
for whom the submission of five copies presents financial hardship may
submit one original and two copies of the application. Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number. In addition, all applicants are
required to submit a copy of their application to their state Single
Point of Contact (SPOC) offices, if they have one. For information on
contacting state SPOC offices, refer to the Guidelines for Preparing
Applications--Fiscal Year 2000.
Because of the high level of public interest in projects supported
by TOP, the program anticipates receiving requests for copies of
successful applications. Applicants are hereby notified that the
applications they submit are subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
To assist NTIA in making disclosure determinations, applicants may
identify sensitive information and label it ``confidential.''
Type of Funding Instrument. The funding instrument for awards under
this program shall be a grant.
Federal Policies and Procedures. Recipients and subrecipients are
subject to all applicable federal laws and federal and Department of
Commerce policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to federal
financial assistance awards.
Pre-Award Activities. If an applicant incurs any project costs
prior to the project start date negotiated at the time the award is
made, it does so solely at its own risk of not being reimbursed by the
government. Applicants are hereby notified that, notwithstanding any
oral or written assurance that they may have received, there is no
obligation on the part of the Department of Commerce to cover pre-award
costs.
No Obligation for Future Funding. If an application is selected for
funding, the Department of Commerce has no obligation to provide any
additional future funding in connection with that award. Renewal of an
award to increase funding or extend the period of performance is at the
total discretion of the Department of Commerce.
Past Performance. Unsatisfactory performance of an applicant under
prior federal financial assistance awards may result in that
applicant's proposal not being considered for funding.
Delinquent Federal Debts. No award of federal funds shall be made
to an applicant who has an outstanding delinquent federal debt until:
1. The delinquent account is paid in full;
2. A negotiated repayment schedule is established and at least one
payment is received; or
3. Other arrangements satisfactory to the Department of Commerce
are made.
Purchase of American Made Products. Applicants are hereby notified
that any equipment or products authorized to be purchased with funding
provided under this program must be American-made to the maximum extent
feasible.
Name Check Review. All non-profit applicants are subject to a name
check review process. Name checks are intended to reveal if any key
individuals associated with the applicant have been convicted of or are
presently facing criminal charges such as fraud, theft, perjury, or
other matters that significantly reflect on the applicant's management,
honesty, or financial integrity.
Primary Applicant Certifications. All primary applicants must
submit a completed Form CD-511, ``Certifications Regarding Debarment,
Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free Workplace
Requirements and Lobbying,'' and the following explanations are hereby
provided:
1. Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension--Prospective
participants (as defined at 15 CFR part 26, section 105) are subject to
15 CFR part 26, ``Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension'' and the
related section of the certification form prescribed above applies;
2. Drug-Free Workplace--Grantees (as defined at 15 CFR part 26,
section 605) are subject to 15 CFR part 26, subpart F, ``Government
wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)'' and the related
section of the certification form prescribed above applies;
3. Anti-Lobbying--Persons (as defined at 15 CFR part 28, section
105) are subject to the lobbying provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1352,
``Limitation on use of appropriated funds to influence certain federal
contracting and financial transactions,'' and the lobbying section of
the certification form prescribed above applies to applications/bids
for grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts for more than
$100,000, and loans and loan guarantees for more than $150,000, or the
single family maximum mortgage limit for affected programs, whichever
is greater; and
4. Anti-Lobbying Disclosure--Any applicant that has paid or will
pay for lobbying in connection with a covered federal action, such as
the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant,
the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement using any funds must submit an SF-LLL, ``Disclosure of
Lobbying Activities'' (OMB Control Number 0348-0046), as required under
15 CFR part 28, appendix B.
Lower Tier Certifications. Recipients shall require applicants/
bidders for subgrants, contracts, subcontracts, or other lower tier
covered transactions at any tier under the award to submit, if
applicable, a completed Form CD-512, ``Certifications Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier
Covered Transactions and Lobbying'' and disclosure form SF-LLL,
``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.'' Form CD-512 is intended for the
use of recipients and should not be transmitted to DOC. SF-LLL
submitted by any tier recipient or subrecipient should be submitted to
DOC in accordance with the instructions contained in the award
document.
False Statements. A false statement on an application is grounds
for denial or termination of funds and grounds for possible punishment
by a fine or imprisonment as provided in 18 U.S.C. 1001.
Intergovernmental Review. Applications under this program are
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.'' It has been determined that this notice is a ``not
significant'' rule under Executive Order 12866.
Bernadette McGuire-Rivera,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information.
[FR Doc. 00-234 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-P
