[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 425-427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-75]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[OPP-300951; FRL-6393-1]
RIN 2070-AB78
Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to revise the tolerances for residues
of azoxystrobin (methyl(E)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-
yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate) and its Z isomer (methyl(Z)-2-(2-(6-
(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate) in or on
pistachios at 0.02 part per million (ppm) and tree nuts at 0.02 ppm. A
final rule establishing tolerances for residues of azoxystrobin and its
Z isomer in or on pistachios at 0.01 ppm and tree nuts at 0.01 ppm was
published in the Federal Register of March 17, 1999 (64 FR 13106).
These were the tolerances that Zeneca Ag Products had originally
proposed, in pesticide petition (PP) 7F4864. Immediately following
completion of this final rule, EPA received telephone comments from two
parties indicating that they believed the pistachio and tree nuts
tolerances were too low, considering the data submitted in support of
the tolerances and the use directions on the label, and might lead to
adulterated commodities even when the label use directions were
accurately followed. EPA agreed to revisit the tolerances assigned to
these commodities, has concluded that the commentors are correct in
their concerns, and here proposes to increase the tolerances for
residues of azoxystrobin and its Z isomer in or on pistachios to 0.02
ppm and in or on tree nuts to 0.02 ppm.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket control number OPP-300951, must
be received by EPA on or before March 6, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail, electronically, or in
person. Please follow the detailed instructions for each method as
provided in Unit I. of the ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.'' To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that you identify docket
control number OPP-300951 in the subject line on the first page of your
response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Cynthia L. Giles-Parker,
Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (703) 305-7740; and e-mail address: parker.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected categories and entities may include, but are not
limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of
Categories NAICS codes Potentially
Affected Entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry 111 Crop production
112 Animal production
311 Food manufacturing
32532 Pesticide
manufacturing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether or not this action might apply to certain entities. If you have
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.''
B. How Can I Get Additional Information, Including Copies of this
Document and Other Related Documents?
1. Electronically. You may obtain electronic copies of this
document, and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, from the EPA Internet Home Page at http://www.epa.gov/.
To access this document, on the Home Page select ``Laws and
Regulations'' and then look up the entry for this document under the
``Federal Register--Environmental Documents.'' You can also go directly
to the Federal Register listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
2. In person. The Agency has established an official record for
this action under docket control number OPP-300951. The official record
consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, and
other information related to this action, including any information
claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). This official
record includes the documents that are physically located in the
docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those
documents. The public version of the official record does not include
any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official
record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic
comments submitted during an applicable comment period is available for
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2 (CM #2), 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy.,
Arlington, VA, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
[[Page 426]]
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB telephone number is
(703) 305-5805.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments through the mail, in person, or
electronically. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket control number OPP-300951 in the subject line on
the first page of your response.
1. By mail. Submit your comments to: Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources and Services Division
(7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection
Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
2. In person or by courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Information Resources
and Services Division (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1921
Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA. The PIRIB is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The PIRIB
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
3. Electronically. You may submit your comments electronically by
e-mail to: opp-docket@epa.gov, or you can submit a computer disk as
described above. Do not submit any information electronically that you
consider to be CBI. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of
encryption. Electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect 6.1/
8.0 or ASCII file format. All comments in electronic form must be
identified by docket control number OPP-300951. Electronic comments may
also be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
D. How Should I Handle CBI that I Want to Submit to the Agency?
Do not submit any information electronically that you consider to
be CBI. You may claim information that you submit to EPA in response to
this document as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as
CBI. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance
with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes any information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as
CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public version of the
official record. Information not marked confidential will be included
in the public version of the official record without prior notice. If
you have any questions about CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI,
please consult the person listed under ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.''
E. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternative ways to improve the proposed rule or
collection activity.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this
document.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
control number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first
page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the Federal Register of March 17, 1999 (64 FR 13106) (FRL-6064-
6), EPA issued a final rule pursuant to section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) (Public Law 104-170), announcing
the establishment of tolerances for residues of azoxystrobin and its Z
isomer on several commodities, including pistachio nuts at 0.01 ppm and
tree nuts at 0.01 ppm, as had been proposed by Zeneca Ag Products in
tolerance petition number (PP) 7F4864. This final rule included a
detailed discussion of the risk assessment and of residue and other
considerations that lay behind EPA's decision to establish the
tolerances. Telephone comments were received from two parties in
California immediately after completion of the rule. In both cases the
parties believed that the pistachios and tree nuts tolerances were too
low, considering the data submitted in support of the tolerances and
the use directions on the label, and might lead to adulterated
commodities even when the use directions on the label were accurately
followed. EPA agreed to revisit the tolerances assigned to these
commodities. If the commentor's comments were substantiated, a
reassessment of the risk from the use of azoxystrobin would also be
necessary. The Agency has concluded that the commentors' concerns are
justified and that the appropriate tolerances for these commodities are
0.02 ppm in or on pistachios and 0.02 ppm in or on tree nuts.
This document proposes to amend 40 CFR 180.507 by increasing the
tolerances for combined residues of the fungicide azoxystrobin and its
Z isomer, in or on pistachios at 0.02 ppm and tree nuts at 0.02 ppm.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures
and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This
includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings,
but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C)
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue....''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 and a complete description of
the risk assessment process, see the final rule on Bifenthrin Pesticide
Tolerances (62 FR 62961, November 26, 1997) (FRL-5754-7).
C. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2), for a tolerance for
[[Page 427]]
combined residues of azoxystrobin and its Z isomer in or on pistachios
at 0.02 ppm and in or on tree nuts at 0.02 ppm. EPA's assessment of the
dietary exposures and risks associated with establishing the tolerances
were published in 64 FR 13106 (March 17, 1999), the final rule that
established the initial tolerances for residues of azoxystrobin in or
on pistachios at 0.01 ppm and in or on tree nuts at 0.01 ppm. In that
rule the Agency concluded that there was a reasonable certainty that no
harm would result from the establishment of azoxystrobin tolerances for
several other commodities. A reassessment of the risk associated with
increasing the azoxystrobin tolerances for pistachios and tree nuts to
0.02 ppm demonstrated that the calculated risk increases were so small
(generally at the fourth decimal place) that the risk assessment values
(rounded) reported in 64 FR 13106 (March 17, 1999) were not changed.
That is, the risk increase resulting from this proposed rule will be
negligible. Accordingly, EPA concludes that modifying these tolerances
as described will be safe for the general population, including infants
and children. EPA reaffirms its specific risk findings set forth in the
March 1999 azoxystrobin tolerance action.
D. International Residue Limits
There are no Codex, Canadian or Mexican Maximum Residue Limits
(MRL) established for azoxystrobin for pistachios or tree nuts. Thus,
harmonization is not an issue.
III. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
This proposed rule seeks to establish a tolerance under FFDCA
section 408(e). The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted
these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor does it require any prior consultation
as specified by Executive Order 13084, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (63 FR 27655, May 19,1998);
special considerations as required by Executive Order 12898, entitled
Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or require OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether establishing tolerances, exemptions from
tolerances, raising tolerance levels or expanding exemptions might
adversely impact small entities and concluded, as a generic matter,
that there is no adverse economic impact. The factual basis for the
Agency's generic certification for tolerance actions published on May
4, 1981 (46 FR 24950), and was provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. In addition, the Agency
has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship between the national government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order
13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive
Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This rule
directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or
distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in
the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 16, 1999.
James Jones,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I shall be amended as
follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), (346a) and 371.
2. In Sec. 180.507, the table to paragraph (a)(1), by revising the
entries for pistachios and tree nuts to read as follows:
Sec. 180.507 Azoxystrobin; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. (1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Pistachios..................................... 0.02
* * * * *
Tree nuts...................................... 0.02
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 00-75 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
