94-217. The Sumitomo Bank, Limited; Application To Engage in Certain Nonbanking Activities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 1994)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 750-751]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-217]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 6, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
     
    
    The Sumitomo Bank, Limited; Application To Engage in Certain 
    Nonbanking Activities
    
        The Sumitomo Bank, Limited, Osaka, Japan (Applicant), has applied 
    pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
    1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and section 225.23 of the Board's Regulation Y 
    (12 CFR 225.23), for approval to engage through its wholly owned 
    subsidiary, Sumitomo Bank Securities, Inc., New York, New York 
    (Company), in underwriting and dealing in, to a limited extent, certain 
    municipal revenue bonds, 1-4 family mortgage-related securities, 
    consumer receivable-related securities, and commercial paper. Applicant 
    proposes to conduct the activities on a world-wide basis.
    
    Closely Related to Banking Standard
    
        Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act provides that a bank holding company 
    may, with Board approval, engage in any activity ``that the Board after 
    due notice and opportunity for hearing has determined (by order or 
    regulation) to be so closely related to banking or managing or 
    controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto''. In determining 
    whether a proposed activity is closely related to banking for purposes 
    of the BHC Act, the Board considers, inter alia, the matters set forth 
    in National Courier Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal 
    Reserve System, 516 F.2d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1975). These considerations 
    are:
        (1) Whether banks generally have in fact provided the proposed 
    services,
        (2) Whether banks generally provide services that are operationally 
    or functionally so similar to the proposed services as to equip them 
    particularly well to provide the proposed services; and
        (3) Whether banks generally provide services that are so integrally 
    related to the proposed services as to require their provision in a 
    specialized form. See 516 F.2d at 1237. In addition, the Board may 
    consider any other basis that may demonstrate that the activity has a 
    reasonable or close relationship to banking or managing or controlling 
    banks. Board Statement Regarding Regulation Y, 49 FR 806 (1984).
        Applicant maintains that the Board previously has determined by 
    order that the proposed activities, when conducted within the 
    limitations established by the Board, are closely related to banking 
    and consistent with section 20 of the Glass-Steagall Act (12 U.S.C. 
    377). See, e.g., Citicorp, 73 Federal Reserve Bulletin 473 (1987), 
    aff'd sub nom. Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the 
    Federal Reserve System, 839 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 486 
    U.S. 1059 (1988); Order Approving Modifications to the Section 20 
    Orders, 75 Federal Reserve Bulletin 751 (1989); The Sanwa Bank, 
    Limited, 76 Federal Reserve Bulletin 568 (1990); Order Approving 
    Modifications to the Section 20 Orders, 79 Federal Reserve Bulletin 226 
    (1993); and Supplement to Order Approving Modifications to Section 20 
    Orders, 79 Federal Reserve Bulletin 360 (1993).
    
    Proper Incident to Banking Standard
    
        In order to approve the proposal, the Board must determine that the 
    proposed activities to be conducted by Company ``can reasonably be 
    expected to produce benefits to the public, such as greater 
    convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, that 
    outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
    resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
    unsound banking practices.'' 12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8).
        Applicant believes that the proposal will produce public benefits 
    that outweigh any potential adverse effects. In particular, Applicant 
    maintains that the proposal will enhance competition and result in 
    greater convenience to Applicant's customers. In addition, Applicant 
    states that the proposed activities will not result in adverse effects 
    such as an undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair 
    competition, conflicts of interests, or unsound banking practices, and 
    that Company will conduct the proposed activities in accordance with 
    prudential limitations designed to safeguard against such potential 
    adverse effects that have been relied upon by the Board in similar 
    previous cases. See, e.g., Citicorp, supra; The Sanwa Bank, Limited, 
    supra. In this regard, Applicant has requested that one of the 
    prudential limitations be modified to permit one officer or one 
    director of one of its United States banking affiliates to serve as a 
    director of Company, a modification which Applicant maintains is 
    consistent with prior Board actions. See, e.g., Synovus Financial 
    Corp., et al., 77 Federal Reserve Bulletin 954 (1991).
        In publishing the proposal for comment, the Board does not take a 
    position on issues raised by the proposal. Notice of the proposal is 
    published solely in order to seek the views of interested persons on 
    the issues presented by the application, and does not represent a 
    determination by the Board that the proposal meets or is likely to meet 
    the standards of the BHC Act.
        Any comments or requests for hearing should be submitted in writing 
    and received by William W. Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the 
    Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551, not later than January 
    26, 1994. Any request for a hearing on this application must, as 
    required by section 262.3(e) of the Board's Rules of Procedure (12 CFR 
    262.3(e)), be accompanied by a statement of the reasons why a written 
    presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
    specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
    evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
    party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal. This 
    application may be inspected at the offices of the Board of Governors 
    or the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    
        Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 30, 
    1993.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Associate Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 94-217 Filed 1-5-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/06/1994
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
94-217
Pages:
750-751 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 6, 1994