00-377. Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Model 750 Citation X Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 65, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2000)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 1075-1076]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 00-377]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-229-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Model 750 Citation X Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); rescission.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to rescind an existing airworthiness 
    directive (AD), applicable to all Cessna Model 750 Citation X series 
    airplanes, that currently requires repetitive in-flight functional 
    tests to verify proper operation of the secondary horizontal stabilizer 
    pitch trim system, and repair, if necessary. The actions specified by 
    that AD are intended to detect and correct such contamination and 
    damage, which could result in simultaneous failure of both primary and 
    secondary pitch trim systems, and consequent reduced controllability of 
    the airplane. Since the issuance of that AD, an improved part has been 
    developed, which, if installed, would terminate the repetitive tests; 
    that improved part has been installed on all affected airplanes or is 
    being installed in production. Therefore, the identified unsafe 
    condition no longer exists.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by February 22, 2000.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-229-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        Information pertaining to this proposed rule may be examined at the 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel M. Ligon, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Propulsion Branch, ACE-116W, FAA, Small Airplane 
    Directorate, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, 
    Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 
    946-4138; fax (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-229-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 99-NM-229-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        On July 29, 1998, the FAA issued AD 98-16-17, amendment 39-10693 
    (63 FR 42206, August 7, 1998), applicable to all Cessna Model 750 
    Citation X series airplanes, to require repetitive in-flight functional 
    tests to verify proper operation of the secondary horizontal stabilizer 
    pitch trim system, and repair, if necessary. That action was prompted 
    by reports of simultaneous failures of the primary and secondary 
    horizontal stabilizer pitch trim system during flight, due to internal 
    water contamination and corrosion damage in the system actuator. The 
    requirements of that AD are intended to detect and correct such 
    contamination and damage, which could result in simultaneous failure of 
    both primary and secondary pitch trim systems, and consequent reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        Since the issuance of that AD, the manufacturer has developed a 
    modification (reference Cessna Service Bulletin SB750-27-23, dated 
    February 2, 1999) that involves replacement of the horizontal 
    stabilizer trim system actuator with an improved actuator incorporating 
    a moisture condenser. The improved design will prevent internal water 
    contamination and corrosion damage of the actuator. The FAA has 
    determined that installation of this improved actuator will adequately 
    address the unsafe condition identified in AD 98-16-17, and will 
    eliminate the need for the repetitive in-flight functional tests 
    required by that AD.
        The manufacturer has verified that the modification has been 
    accomplished on all affected airplanes, including those in production, 
    and on all actuators in operators' inventories. Therefore, the unsafe 
    condition cannot be reintroduced into the fleet.
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        Since all affected airplanes, including those in production, and 
    all actuators in operators' inventories have been modified, the FAA has 
    determined that it is necessary to rescind AD 98-16-17 in order to 
    prevent operators from performing an unnecessary action.
        This proposed action would rescind AD 98-16-17. Rescission of AD 
    98-16-17 would constitute only such action, and, if followed by a final 
    action, would not preclude the agency from issuing another notice in 
    the future, nor would it commit the agency to any course of action in 
    the future.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 52 airplanes of U.S. registry are affected 
    by AD 98-
    
    [[Page 1076]]
    
    16-17. The actions that are currently required by that AD take 
    approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated 
    to be $6,240, or $120 per airplane. However, the adoption of this 
    proposed rescission would eliminate those costs.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have a substantial direct 
    effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
    is determined that this proposal would not have federalism implications 
    under Executive Order 13132.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ``ADDRESSES.''
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10693.
    
    Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket 99-NM-229-AD. Rescinds AD 98-16-17, 
    Amendment 39-10693.
        Applicability: All Model 750 Citation X series airplanes, 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 3, 2000.
    Donald L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 00-377 Filed 1-6-00; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/07/2000
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); rescission.
Document Number:
00-377
Dates:
Comments must be received by February 22, 2000.
Pages:
1075-1076 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-229-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
00-377.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13