96-180. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to New Organizational Structures for Members  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 568-569]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-180]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-36660; File No. SR-Phlx-95-73]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
    Order Granting Approval to Proposed Rule Change Relating to New 
    Organizational Structures for Members
    
    December 29, 1995.
        On October 4, 1995, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' 
    or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
    Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
    proposed rule change to include within the definition of ``member 
    firm'' found in the Phlx By-Laws and rules entities with organizational 
    structures essentially similar to partnerships and corporations and to 
    make the provisions in its By-Laws and rules that pertain to partners 
    of partnership member firms applicable to those persons performing 
    similar functions in non-partnership member firms. On October 11, 1995, 
    the Exchange submitted to the Commission Amendment No. 1 to the 
    proposed rule change,\3\ and on November 1, 1995, the Exchange 
    submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Letter from Murray L. Ross, Secretary, Phlx, to Glen 
    Barrentine, Senior Counsel, SEC, dated October 2, 1995. Amendment 
    No. 1 renumbered the rule filing.
        \4\ See Letter from Murray L. Ross, Secretary, Phlx, to Glen 
    Barrentine, Senior Counsel, SEC, dated October 25, 1995. See infra 
    note 8 and text accompanying note 11 for a description of Amendment 
    No. 2.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 were published 
    for comment in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36482 (November 14, 
    1995), 60 FR 58126 (November 24, 1995). No comments were received on 
    the proposal.
        Recently, Pennsylvania law and the laws of 46 other jurisdictions 
    have recognized the existence of new legal entities such as limited 
    liability companies (``LLCs''),\5\ limited liability partnerships 
    (``LLPs''),\6\ and business trusts.\7\ As of February 5, 1995, 
    Pennsylvania has authorized the existence of LLCs and LLPs. Presently, 
    the Exchange's By-Laws and Rules recognize two types of member 
    organizations: partnerships under the term ``member firm'' and 
    corporations under the term ``member corporation.''
    
        \5\ An LLC combines various characteristics of both corporations 
    and partnerships. For example, an LLC is a non-corporate entity 
    under which neither the owners nor those managing the business are 
    personally liable for the entity's obligations, however, the LLC is 
    treated as a pass-through entity for federal income tax purposes. 
    See Robert R. Keatinge et al., The Limited Liability Company: A 
    Study of the Emerging Entity, 47 Bus. Law. 378 (1992).
        \6\ An LLP differs from a traditional partnership entity in two 
    significant ways. First, in an LLP the liability of a partner or the 
    partnership is no longer joint and several among the partners; 
    instead, a partner generally will be personally liable only for his 
    or her own conduct and that of those under his or her direct 
    supervision. Second, an LLP is treated as a pass-through entity for 
    federal income tax purposes. See Sharon Kanovsky, LLPs: A New Form 
    of Organization, 25 Tax Advisor 409 (1994).
        \7\ The term ``business trust'' is generally used to describe a 
    trust in which the managers are principals and the shareholders are 
    cestuis que trust. Its essential attribute is that property is 
    placed in the hands of trustees who manage and deal with it for the 
    use and benefit of beneficiaries. Black's Law Dictionary 180 (5th 
    ed. 1979).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change would allow the Exchange to recognize 
    these new legal entities as Phlx member firms by amending the 
    definitions of ``member firm'' found in Article I, Section 1-1(c) of 
    the By-Laws and Rule 3 to encompass organizations that are essentially 
    similar to member firms including, but not limited to, LLCs, LLPs, and 
    business trusts.
        The Exchange also proposes to amend Article I, Section 1-1(c) and 
    Rule 3 to make provisions in the Phlx By-Laws and rules that pertain to 
    general, special or limited partners in partnership member firms 
    applicable, as appropriate, to those persons who perform essentially 
    similar functions as such partners in non-partnership member firms.\8\
    
        \8\ Amendment No. 2 added this provision to the proposed rule 
    change. Amendment No. 2 also withdrew a proposed change to Rule 902 
    that would have required a member intending to form a non-
    partnership member firm to submit certain specified documentation to 
    the Exchange, as the proposed change to Rule 3 gives the Exchange 
    the authority to require the submission of such documentation under 
    the current Rule 902. Amendment No. 2 also included additional 
    minimum requirements to be satisfied before LLCs, LLPs, business 
    trusts, or other organizations with characteristics of partnerships 
    or corporations could be approved as Phlx members. See note 11 and 
    accompanying text.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b).\9\ Specifically, the 
    Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 6(b)(2) of the 
    
    [[Page 569]]
    Act, which requires the rules of an exchange, subject to the provisions 
    of Section 6(c) of the Act,\10\ to ensure that any registered broker or 
    dealer or natural person associated with a registered broker or dealer 
    may become a member of the exchange and any person may become 
    associated with a member thereof.
    
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Phlx currently allows individuals, partnerships, and 
    corporations to become members of the Exchange. The proposed rule 
    change would allow entities with new organizational structures similar 
    to partnerships and corporations to become Exchange member firms. As in 
    the case of an individual, partnership, or corporation applying for 
    membership, the new entity will be subject to all other requirements 
    for membership approval.
        The Commission also believes that the proposed rule change 
    reasonably balances the Exchange's interest in having the flexibility 
    to approve entities with new organizational structures for Exchange 
    membership with the regulatory interests in protecting the financial 
    and structural integrity of a member firm. For example, although the 
    proposed rule change permits the Exchange to approve LLCs, LLPs, 
    business trusts, or other organizational structures with 
    characteristics of corporations or partnerships as member firms, the 
    Phlx will review each Exchange member organization application on a 
    case-by-case basis, and prior to approving any such entity for 
    membership, the Exchange must be satisfied that: (1) Such entity would 
    be structured in such a format that would qualify as a broker or dealer 
    registered with the Commission pursuant to the Act; (2) the Phlx would 
    legally have appropriate jurisdiction over such entity; and (3) the 
    permanency of such entity's capital is consistent with that required of 
    other member firms. \11\
    
        \11\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the Commission believes that, consistent with Section 
    6(d)(1) of the Act, the proposed rule change will enhance the 
    Exchange's ability to enforce compliance by its members and persons 
    associated with its members with the rules of the Exchange by making 
    provisions in the Phlx By-Laws and rules that pertain to general, 
    special or limited partners in partnership member firms applicable, as 
    appropriate, to those persons who perform essentially similar functions 
    as such partners in non-partnership member firms.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-95-73), as amended, is 
    approved.
    
        \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority. \13\
    
        \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-180 Filed 1-5-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/08/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-180
Pages:
568-569 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36660, File No. SR-Phlx-95-73
PDF File:
96-180.pdf