97-415. Interregional Research Project Number 4; Pesticide Tolerance Petitions Filing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 1114-1117]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-415]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [PF-688; FRL-5582-6]
    
    
    Interregional Research Project Number 4; Pesticide Tolerance 
    Petitions Filing
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the filing of amendments to pesticide 
    petitions 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162. These amendments 
    propose to extend the effective date for time-limited tolerances 
    established for the combined residues of the herbicide 2-[1-
    (ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-
    one (also referred to in this document as sethoxydim) and its 
    metabolites in or on various raw agricultural commodities. This notice 
    contains a summary of the amended petition prepared by BASF Corporation 
    (BASF) and submitted by the Interregional Research Project Number 4 
    (IR-4), the petitioner.
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket number [PF-688; FRL-5582-6], 
    must be received on or before February 7, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M. St. SW.,
    
    [[Page 1115]]
    
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. Comments and data 
    may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail (e-
    mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic comments on this 
    notice may also be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
        Information submitted as comments concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    Confidential Business Information (CBI). CBI should not be submitted 
    through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be disclosed except 
    in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the 
    comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments will be 
    available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the address given above, 
    from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: OPP-Docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket number PF-688. No CBI should be submitted through e-mail. 
    Electronic comments on this proposed rule may be filed online at many 
    Federal Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic 
    submissions can be found in Unit III of this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, 
    Registration Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 
    2800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 308-8783, e-
    mail:jamerson.hoyt@epamail.epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received amendments to pesticide 
    petitions 0E3909, 2E4052, 2E4065, 2E4092, and 3E4162 from the 
    Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4), New Jersey Agricultural 
    Experiment Station, P.O. Box 231, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 
    08903. These amendments propose, pursuant to section 408 of the Federal 
    Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, to amend 40 CFR 
    part 180 by extending the effective date to expire on December 31, 
    1998, for time-limited tolerances established for residues of the 
    herbicide 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-
    cyclohexen-1-one) and its metabolites containing the 2-cyclohexen-1-one 
    moiety (calculated as the herbicide) in or on asparagus at 4.0 parts 
    per million (ppm), carrot at 1.0 ppm, cranberry and endive at 2.0 ppm, 
    and peppermint and spearmint at 30 ppm. Registration for use of 
    sethoxydim on endive is limited to Florida based on the geographical 
    representation of the residue data submitted. Additional residue data 
    will be required to expand the area of usage. Persons seeking 
    geographically broader registration should contact the Agency's 
    Registration Division at the address provided above.
        EPA has determined that the amendment contains data or information 
    regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has 
    not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time 
    or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data 
    may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.
        The nature of the residue is adequately understood, and practical 
    and adequate analytical methods are available for enforcement purposes. 
    Enforcement methods for sethoxydim are listed in the Pesticide 
    Analytical Manual, Volume II (PAM II). Enforcement methods have also 
    been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration for publication in 
    PAM II.
        As required by section 408(d) of the FFDCA, as recently amended by 
    the Food Quality Protection Act, IR-4 submitted a summary of amendments 
    to the pesticide petitions and authorization for the summary to be 
    published in the Federal Register in a notice of receipt of the 
    petition. The summary was prepared by and represents the views of BASF; 
    EPA, as mentioned above, is in the process of evaluating the petition. 
    As required by section 408(d)(3) EPA is including the summary as a part 
    of this notice of filing. EPA may have made minor edits to the summary 
    for the purpose of clarity.
    
    I. Petition Summary
    
    A. Toxicological Profile
    
        1. Data summary. A summary of toxicological studies for sethoxydim 
    follows:
        i. A 1-year feeding study with dogs fed diets containing 0, 8.86/
    9.41, 17.5/19.9, and 110/129 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg)/day (males/
    females) with a no-observed-effect-level (NOEL) of 8.86/9.41 mg/kg/day 
    (males/females) based on equivocal anemia in male dogs at the 17.5-mg/
    kg/day dose level.
        ii. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study with mice fed 
    diets containing 0, 40, 120, 360, and 1,080 ppm (equivalent to 0, 6, 
    18, 54, and 162 mg/kg/day) with a systemic NOEL of 120 ppm (18 mg/kg/
    day) based on non-neoplastic liver lesions in male mice at the 360 ppm 
    (54 mg/kg/day) dose level. There were no carcinogenic effects observed 
    under the conditions of the study. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 
    not achieved in female mice.
        iii. A 2-year chronic feeding/carcinogenic study with rats fed 
    diets containing 0, 2, 6, and 18 mg/kg/day with a systemic NOEL greater 
    than or equal to 18 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested). There were no 
    carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study. This 
    study was reviewed under current guidelines and was found to be 
    unacceptable because the doses used were insufficient to induce a toxic 
    response and an MTD was not achieved.
        iv. A second chronic feeding/carcinogenic study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 360, and 1,080 ppm (equivalent to 18.2/23.0, and 55.9/
    71.8 mg/kg/day (males/females). The dose levels were too low to elicit 
    a toxic response in the test animals and failed to achieve an MTD or 
    define a lowest effect level (LEL). Slight decreases in body weight in 
    rats at the 1,080-ppm dose level, although not biologically 
    significant, support a free-standing no-observed-adverse-effect-level 
    (NOAEL) of 1,080 ppm (55.9/71.8 mg/kg/day (males/females)). There were 
    no carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study.
        v. A developmental toxicity study in rats fed dosages of 0, 50, 
    180, 650, and 1,000 mg/kg/day with a maternal NOAEL of 180 mg/kg/day 
    and a maternal LEL of 650 mg/kg/day (irregular gait, decreased 
    activity, excessive salivation, and anogenital staining); and a 
    developmental NOAEL of 180 mg/kg/day and a developmental LEL of 650 mg/
    kg/day (21 to 22 percent decrease in fetal weights, filamentous tail, 
    and lack of tail due to the absence of sacral and/or caudal vertebrae, 
    and delayed ossification in the hyoids, vertebral centrum and/or 
    transverse processes, sternebrae and/or metatarsals, and pubes).
        vi. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits fed doses of 0, 80, 
    160, 320, and 400 mg/kg/day with a maternal NOEL of 320 mg/kg/day and a 
    maternal LOEL of 400 mg/kg/day (37 percent reduction in
    
    [[Page 1116]]
    
    body weight gain without significant differences in group mean body 
    weights and decreased food consumption during dosing); and a 
    developmental NOEL greater than 400 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested).
        vii. A 2-generation reproduction study with rats fed diets 
    containing 0, 150, 600, and 3,000 ppm (approximately 0, 7.5, 30, and 
    150 mg/kg/day) with no reproductive effects observed under the 
    conditions of the study.
        viii. Mutagenicity studies including: Ames assays were negative for 
    gene mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, 
    and TA1537, with and without metabolic activity; a Chinese hamster bone 
    marrow cytogenetic assay was negative for structural chromosomal 
    aberrations at doses up to 5,000 mg/kg in Chinese hamster bone marrow 
    cells in vivo; and recombinant assays and forward mutations tests in 
    Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and S. typhimurium were all 
    negative for genotoxic effects at concentrations of greater than or 
    equal to 100 percent.
        ix. In a rat metabolism study, excretion was extremely rapid and 
    tissue accumulation was negligible.
        2. Chronic toxicity. Based on the available chronic toxicity data, 
    EPA has established the Reference Dose (RfD) for sethoxydim at 0.09 
    milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) bw/day. The RfD for sethoxydim is based 
    on a 1-year feeding study in dogs with a threshold no-observed effect 
    level (NOEL) of 8.86 mg/kg/day and an uncertainty factor of 100.
        3. Acute toxicity. Based on the available acute toxicity data, 
    sethoxydim does not pose any acute dietary risks. Several acute 
    toxicology studies place technical sethoxydim in acute toxicity 
    category IV for primary eye and dermal irritation and acute toxicity 
    category III for acute oral, dermal, and inhalation. The dermal 
    sensitization-guinea pig study was waived because no sensitization was 
    seen in guinea pigs dosed with the end-use product Poast (18 percent 
    active ingredient).
        4. Carcinogenicity. These tolerances were established as time-
    limited tolerances since an acceptable carcinogenicity study is needed 
    in one rodent species. A repeat chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study 
    in rats was submitted to EPA in November of 1995 and is awaiting 
    review. The Agency will reassess sethoxydim tolerances based on the 
    outcome of the rat chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study and, if 
    appropriate, will establish permanent tolerances for asparagus, carrot, 
    cranberry, endive, peppermint and spearmint. In the interim, there is 
    little risk from the proposed time extension for these uses of 
    sethoxydim, since available studies in rats and mice indicate no 
    carcinogenic effects, there are adequate data to establish a RfD, 
    existing tolerances (including these time-limited tolerances) do not 
    exceed the RfD, and the tolerances for asparagus, carrot, cranberry, 
    endive, and mint utilize less than 1 percent of the Reference Dose. 
    Thus a cancer risk assessment is not necessary.
    
    B. Aggregate Exposure
    
        For purposes of assessing the potential dietary exposure, BASF has 
    estimated aggregate exposure based on the Theoretical Maximum Residue 
    Contribution (TMRC) from the tolerances of sethoxydim on: asparagus at 
    4.0 ppm, carrot at 1.0 ppm, cranberry and endive at 2.0 ppm, and 
    peppermint and spearmint at 30.0 ppm. (The TMRC is a ``worst case'' 
    estimate of dietary exposure since it is assumed that 100 percent of 
    all crops for which tolerances are established are treated and that 
    pesticide residues are at the tolerance levels.) The TMRC from existing 
    tolerances for the overall U.S. population is estimated at 0.0311961 
    mg/kg bw/day, or 36 percent of the RfD. Dietary exposure to residues of 
    sethoxydim in or on asparagus, carrot, cranberry, endive and mint 
    increases the TMRC by 0.000701 mg/kg bw/day and accounts for less than 
    1 percent of the RfD for the overall U.S. population. EPA estimates 
    indicate that dietary exposures will not exceed the RfD for any 
    population subgroup for which EPA has data [See Proposed Rule at 60 FR 
    13941, March 15, 1995]. This exposure assessment relies on very 
    conservative assumptions--100 percent of crops will contain sethoxydim 
    residues and those residues would be at the level of the tolerance 
    which results in an overestimate of human exposure.
        Other potential sources of exposure of the general population to 
    residues of pesticides are residues in drinking water and exposure from 
    non-occupational sources. Based on the available studies used in EPA's 
    assessment of environmental risk, BASF does not anticipate exposure to 
    residues of sethoxydim in drinking water. There is no established 
    Maximum Concentration Level (MCL) for residues of sethoxydim in 
    drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).
        EPA has not estimated non-occupational exposure for sethoxydim. 
    Sethoxydim is labeled for use by homeowners on the following use sites: 
    flowers, evergreens, shrubs, trees, fruits, vegetables, ornamental 
    ground covers, and bedding plants. Hence, the potential for non-
    occupational exposure to the general population exists. However, these 
    use sites do not appreciably increase exposure. Protective clothing 
    requirements, including the use of gloves, adequately protect 
    homeowners when applying the product. The product may only be applied 
    through hose-end sprayers or tank sprayers as a 0.14% solution. 
    Sethoxydim is not a volatile compound so inhalation exposure during and 
    after application would be negligible. Dermal exposure would be minimal 
    in light of the protective clothing and the low application rate. Post-
    treatment (re-entry) exposure would be negligible for these use sites 
    as contact with treated surfaces would be low. Dietary risks from 
    treated food crops are already adequately regulated by the established 
    tolerances. The additional uses endive, asparagus , carrots, 
    cranberries, peppermint, and spearmint will not increase the non-
    occupational exposure appreciably, if at all. Thus, BASF believes that 
    the potential for non-occupational exposure to the general population 
    is insignificant.
        BASF also considered the potential for cumulative effects of 
    sethoxydim and other substances that have a common mechanism of 
    toxicity. BASF is aware of one other active ingredient which is 
    structurally similar, clethodim. However, BASF believes that 
    consideration of a common mechanism of toxicity is not appropriate at 
    this time. BASF does not have any reliable information to indicate that 
    toxic effects produced by sethoxydim would be cumulative with clethodim 
    or any other chemical; thus, BASF is considering only the potential 
    risks of sethoxydim in its exposure assessment.
    
    C. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population
    
        Reference Dose (RfD). Using the conservative exposure assumptions 
    described above, based on the completeness and the reliability of the 
    toxicity data, EPA has estimated that aggregate exposure to sethoxydim 
    will utilize 37 percent of the RfD for the U.S. population. EPA 
    generally has no concern for exposures below 100 percent of the RfD. 
    Therefore, based on the completeness and reliability of the toxicity 
    data, and the conservative exposure assessment, BASF concludes that 
    there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate 
    exposure to residues of sethoxydim, including all anticipated dietary 
    exposure and all other non-occupational exposures.
    
    [[Page 1117]]
    
    D. Determination of Safety for Infants and Children
    
        1. Developmental toxicity. Developmental toxicity was observed in a 
    developmental toxicity study using rats but was not seen in a 
    developmental toxicity study using rabbits. A developmental NOAEL of 
    180 mg/kg/day and developmental LEL of 650 mg/kg/day were established 
    for the rat study. Effects noted in the rat study included decrease in 
    fetal weights (21 to 22 percent), filamentous tail, lack of tail (due 
    to absence of sacral and/or caudal vertebrae), and delayed ossification 
    (hyoids, vertebral centrum and/or transverse processes, sternebrae and/
    or metatarsals, and pubes). The developmental NOEL for the rabbit study 
    was greater than 400 mg/kg/day and was the highest dose tested. The 
    developmental effects observed in the rat study are believed to be 
    secondary effects resulting from maternal stress.
        2. Reproductive toxicity. A two-generation reproduction study with 
    rats fed diets containing 0, 150, 600, and 3,000 ppm (approximately 0, 
    7.5, 30, and 150 mg/kg/day) produced no reproductive effects during the 
    course of the study. Although the dose levels were insufficient to 
    elicit a toxic response, the Agency has considered this study usable 
    for regulatory purposes and has established a free-standing NOEL of 
    3,000 ppm (approximately 150 mg/kg/day) [See Proposed Rule at 60 FR 
    13941, March 15, 1995].
        RFD. Based on the demonstrated lack of significant developmental or 
    reproductive toxicity BASF believes that the RfD used to assess safety 
    to children should be the same as that for the general population, 0.09 
    mg/kg/day. Using the conservative exposure assumptions described above, 
    BASF has concluded that the most sensitive child population is that of 
    children ages 1 to 6. BASF calculates the exposure to this group to be 
    less than 70 percent of the RfD for all uses (including those proposed 
    in this document). The proposed tolerances in endive, asparagus, 
    carrot, cranberry, peppermint and spearmint represent an exposure to 
    this group of less than 1 percent. Based on the completeness and 
    reliability of the toxicity data and the conservative exposure 
    assessment, BASF concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no 
    harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the 
    residues of sethoxydim, including dietary exposure and all other non-
    occupational exposures.
        3. Endocrine effects. No special studies investigating potential 
    estrogenic or endocrine effects of sethoxydim have been conducted. 
    However, the standard battery of required studies has been completed. 
    These studies include an evaluation of the potential effects on 
    reproduction and development, and an evaluation of the pathology of the 
    endocrine organs following repeated or long-term exposure. These 
    studies are generally considered to be sufficient to detect any 
    endocrine effects but no such effects were noted in any of the studies.
    
    II. Other Considerations
    
        There is no reasonable expectation that secondary residues will 
    occur in milk, eggs, or meat of livestock and poultry from the proposed 
    uses of sethoxydim on asparagus, cranberries, endive, and mint; there 
    are no livestock feed commodities associated with these commodities. 
    Any secondary residues occurring in meat, fat, meat byproducts and milk 
    of cattle, goats, hogs, horses and sheep from the proposed use on 
    carrots will be covered by existing tolerances. There are no residues 
    expected to occur in poultry meat, meat byproducts, fat or eggs since 
    carrots are not considered a poultry feed item. There are no Codex 
    maximum residue levels established for residues of sethoxydim on 
    asparagus, carrots, cranberry, endive, or mint.
    
    III. Public Record
    
        EPA invites interested persons to submit comments on this notice of 
    filing. Comments must bear a notation indicating the docket number, 
    [PF-688; FRL-5582-6]. All written comments filed in response to this 
    petition will be available in the Public Response and Program Resources 
    Branch, at the address given above from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, except legal holidays.
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PF-688; FRL-5582-6] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this notice of filing, as well as the 
    public version, as described above will be kept in paper form. 
    Accordingly, EPA will transfer all comments received electronically 
    into printed, paper form as they are received and will place the paper 
    copies in the official rulemaking record which will also include all 
    comments submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record 
    is the paper record maintained at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping.
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
    
        Dated: December 31, 1996.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-415 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/08/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-415
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket number [PF-688; FRL-5582-6], must be received on or before February 7, 1997.
Pages:
1114-1117 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-688, FRL-5582-6
PDF File:
97-415.pdf