[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1145-1148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-473]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
Foreign Language and Area Studies--U.S. Students and Scholars;
Request for Proposals
ACTION: Notice; request for proposals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Academic Programs of the United States
Information Agency's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for an assistance award. Public and
private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in
IRS regulation 26 CFR 1.501(c) may apply to develop and administer
programs in cooperation with USIA that will assist U.S. citizens who
are graduate students and postdoctoral scholars and who have a new or
established interest in North African, Middle Eastern and South Asian
studies. Activities permitted under this program include foreign
language training, foreign area studies and foreign area research for
periods ranging from two to twenty-four months abroad.
Overall grant-making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Pub. L. 87-256,
as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests,
[[Page 1146]]
developments, and achievements of the people of the United States and
other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of friendly,
sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States and the
other countries of the world.''
The funding authority for the program cited above is provided
through the Near and Middle East Research and Training Act (Pub. L.
102-138, Section 228 as amended by Pub. L. 103-236, Section 233).
Programs and projects must conform with Agency requirements and
guidelines outlined in the Solicitation Package. USIA projects and
programs are subject to the availability of funds.
For the purpose of this program, the geographic area refers to the
region consisting of countries and peoples covered by the Bureau of
Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs of the U.S. Department of State as
of October, 1991, and Turkey.
Current eligible locales for overseas research are: Mauritania,
Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, Jordan, Syria,
Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Oman,
Oatar, Yemen, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.
Individual NMERTA grantees are required to provide proof of
insurance to the grant-making organizations before fellowship funds can
be released. Health and accident, MEDEVAC and repatriation insurance is
strongly recommended.
Announcement Title and Number
All communications with USIA concerning this announcement should
refer to the annual NMERTA open competition. The announcement number E/
AEN-98-01. Please refer to title and number in all correspondence or
telephone calls to USIA.
Deadline for Proposals
All copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency by 5
p.m. Washington, D.C. time on Friday, March 6, 1998. Faxed documents
will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked March 6, 1998 but
received at a later date. It is the responsibility of each applicant to
ensure that proposals are received by the above deadline. Grants should
begin no earlier than September 1, 1998 and no later than September 30,
1998 and end no later than 24 months thereafter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Spann or John Sedlins in the
Academic Exchange Program Division, North Africa, Middle East and South
Asia branch, E/AEN, Room 212, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547, telephone number (202) 619-5368, fax
number (202) 205-2466, Internet address [email protected] or
[email protected] to request a Solicitation Package containing more
detailed award criteria, required application forms, and standard
guidelines for preparing proposals, including specific criteria for
preparation of the proposal budget.
To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet. The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from USIA's website at http://
www.usia.gov/education/rfps/. Please read all information before
beginning to download.
To Receive a Solicitation Package Via Fax on Demand. The entire
Solicitation Package may be received via the Bureau's ``Grants
Information Fax on Demand System'', which is accessed by calling 202/
401-7616. Please request a ``Table of Contents'' of available documents
when first entering the system. This will provide order numbers for
items pertaining to this request for proposals.
Please specify USIA Program Assistant Patricia Spann on all
inquiries and correspondences. Interested applicants should read the
complete Federal Register announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFP deadline has passed, Agency staff
may not discuss this competition in any way with applicants until the
Bureau proposal review process has been completed.
Submissions. Applicants must follow all instructions given in the
Solicitation Package. The original and 7 copies of the application
should be sent to: U.S. Information Agency, Ref.: E/AEN-98-01--Annual
NMERTA Open Competition, Office of Grants Management, E/XE, Room 326,
301 4th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20547.
Applicants must also submit the ``Executive Summary'' and
``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the proposal on a 3.5'' diskette,
formatted for DOS. This material must be provided in ASCII text (DOS)
format with a maximum line length of 65 characters. USIA will transmit
these files electronically to USIS posts overseas for their review,
with the goal of reducing the time it takes to get posts' comments for
the Agency's grants review process.
Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
``Support for Diversity'' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into the total proposal. Public Law 104-319
provides that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy'', USIA ``shall take appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.'' Proposals should account for
advancement of this goal in their program contents, to the full extent
deemed feasible.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
Pursuant to the Agency's authorizing legislation (the Fulbright-
Hays Act, Public Law 87-256), programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and representative of the diversity of
American political, social and cultural life.
Support is offered in two categories. Organizations may address one
or both categories, but must submit a separate proposal for each
category. Special emphasis will be given to the social sciences and
humanities.
Category A; Pre-doctoral Students
Organizations that are awarded funding shall solicit and receive
applications from U.S.-citizen, graduate students nationwide who seek
to conduct overseas study and research in the eligible locales listed
above. Eligible fields of study and research shall be open to students
of all disciplines with a new or established interest in topics
requiring study or research in the geographic area(s). Eligibility
shall be restricted to applicants who have a baccalaureate degree and
who are already enrolled in graduate-level academic programs.
Category B; Postdoctoral Scholars
Organizations that are awarded funding shall solicit and receive
applications from U.S.-citizen, postdoctoral scholars nationwide who
seek to conduct overseas study and research in the eligible locales
listed above. Eligible fields of study and research shall be open to
scholars of all
[[Page 1147]]
disciplines with a new or established interest in topics requiring
study or research in the geographic area(s). Eligibility shall be
restricted to applicants who have a Ph.D. and who have college or
university teaching experience.
In preparing a proposal, organizations should address the subjects
of program design and scheduling, as well as program administration. At
a minimum, a successful proposal should clearly cover publicity,
selection process, orientation for participants, and logistical and
scheduling measures. A basic plan for post-program follow-up and
evaluation should also be included. In keeping with the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993, proposals should emphasize how
grantee organizations will evaluate the effectiveness, economy and
efficiency of their programs. Cost-sharing will be used in the review
process as one measure. The proposal must be typewritten, double-spaced
and may not exceed twenty (20) pages including budget attachments.
The Office of Academic Exchanges strongly recommends that
applicants consult with host country USIS posts prior to submitting
proposals.
Proposed budget: Awards will not exceed $200,000. Awards to
eligible organizations with less than four years of experience in
conducting international exchange programs will be limited to $60,000.
Applicants must submit a comprehensive, line-item budget based on
the specific guidance in the Solicitation Package for the entire
program. There must be a summary budget as well as break-down
reflecting both the administrative budget and the program budget. For
better understanding or further clarification, applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or
activity in order to facilitate USIA decisions on funding.
Budget guidelines apply to proposals submitted in both Category A
and B described above.
Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) round-trip international travel via an American flag carrier;
(2) domestic travel;
(3) maintenance and per diem;
(4) academic program costs (e.g. book allowance);
(5) orientation costs;
(6) cultural enrichment costs (e.g. admissions, tickets, etc.);
(7) U.S.-based administration costs (e.g. advertisement,
recruitment and selection costs).
Please refer to the Solicitation Package (the Proposal Submission
Instructions or PSI) for complete budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
Administrative costs are not to exceed 20 percent of the requested
budget.
Competition for USIA funding support is keen. Cost-sharing at a
minimum of 25 percent of the total project cost is strongly encouraged.
Review Process
USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them
for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they
do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. Eligible proposals will be forwarded to panels of
USIA officers for advisory review. All eligible proposals will be
reviewed by the USIA Office of Academic Programs, as well as by the
USIA Office of North African, Near Eastern, and South Asian Affairs and
the USIA post(s) overseas, where appropriate. Proposals may be reviewed
by the Office of the General Counsel or by other Agency elements.
Funding decisions are at the discretion of the USIA Associate Director
for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (grants or cooperative agreements) resides with the
USIA grants officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to Agency mission.
2. Program planning/Ability to achieve program objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to
the program overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should
be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effective/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-on activities).
5. Institutional Capacity/Reputation/Ability: Proposed personnel
and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project's goals. Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Agency grants as determined by USIA's Office of
Contracts. The Agency will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants.
6. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without USIA support) which ensures that
USIA-supported programs are not isolated events.
7. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended. Successful applicants will be
expected to submit intermediate reports after each project component is
concluded or quarterly, whichever is less frequent.
8. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
9. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects
should receive positive assessments by USIA's geographic area desk and
overseas officers of program need, potential impact, and significance
in partner country(ies).
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFP are binding and may
not be modified by any USIA representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Agency that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFP does not constitute an award commitment on
the part of the Government. The Agency reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
[[Page 1148]]
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Organizations will
be expected to cooperate with USIA in evaluating their programs under
the principles of the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993,
which requires federal agencies to measure and report on the results of
their programs and activities.
Notification
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal USIA procedures.
Awards made will be subject to periodic reporting and evaluation
requirements.
Dated: January 5, 1998.
Robert L. Earle,
Deputy Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-473 Filed 1-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
