[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1110-1112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-48]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 98-NM-142-AD; Amendment 39-10979; AD 99-01-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell IC-600 Integrated Avionics
Computers, as Installed In, But Not Limited To, Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-145 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to certain Honeywell IC-600 integrated avionics computers,
that requires modification of the integrated avionics computers. This
amendment is prompted by a report of integrated avionics computer
failures, which caused a ``random reset'' condition of the electronic
flight instrument system. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to prevent such ``random reset'' conditions, which could affect the
pilot's ability to control the airplane.
DATES: Effective February 12, 1999.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 12, 1999.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Honeywell Inc., Business and Commuter Aviation Systems,
Box 29000, Phoenix, Arizona 85038. This information may be examined at
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane
Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington;
or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California;
or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street,
NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Kirk Baker, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5345;
fax (562) 627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Honeywell IC-600
integrated avionics computers was published in the Federal Register on
June 3, 1998 (63 FR 30155). That
[[Page 1111]]
action proposed to require modification of the integrated avionics
computers.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Request To Limit Applicability
One commenter requests that Learjet Model 45 airplanes be removed
from the applicability of the proposed rule. The commenter indicates
that there was only one Learjet Model 45 airplane with the suspect
Honeywell IC-600 integrated avionics computer that received a standard
certificate of airworthiness, and that airplane has been modified in
accordance with the proposed rule.
The FAA concurs with the commenter's request that the Learjet Model
45 airplanes be removed from the applicability of the final rule. This
decision is based on supporting documentation that there was only one
Learjet Model 45 airplane with the suspect IC-600, and a modified IC-
600 was installed on that airplane before delivery to the customer.
Furthermore, Learjet has incorporated the required modifications into
production. The part numbers related to these airplanes will be removed
from the appropriate sections in the final rule. The Summary and
Applicability sections, as well as paragraph (b) of the final rule,
have been revised accordingly.
Request To Reduce Compliance Time and Revise the Airplane Flight
Manual
One commenter requests that the compliance time for the
modification in the proposed rule be reduced from 6 months to 30 days
so that the unsafe condition is addressed in a more timely manner. The
commenter also requests that a temporary revision to the FAA-approved
Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) be issued in the interim to alert
flightcrews of the potential hazards if the electronic flight
instrument system fails. The commenter states that this is necessary
because the unsafe condition exists today and the flightcrews may be
unaware of the possibility of this potentially catastrophic condition.
The FAA does not concur with the commenter's request. In developing
an appropriate compliance time, the FAA considered the safety
implications, parts availability, and normal maintenance schedules.
Further, the compliance time of 6 months was established with the
operator's, the manufacturer's, and FAA's concurrence. The FAA also has
determined that, without prior notice and opportunity for public
comment, a reduction in the compliance time is not appropriate. In
light of these factors, and in consideration of the amount of time that
has already elapsed since issuance of the proposed rule, the FAA has
determined that further delay of this final rule is not warranted.
However, if additional data are presented that would justify a
reduction in the compliance time, the FAA may consider further
rulemaking on this issue.
With regard to the commenter's request for an AFM revision, the FAA
has considered the potential hazard for temporary loss of flight
guidance and does not consider that hazard to be catastrophic. The
flightcrew's ability to use the standby instruments during the 30-
second rebuild of the display will allow them continued operational
safety. Additionally, it was determined that at no time did the display
present any hazardously misleading information. Therefore, the FAA does
not find it appropriate to require a revision of the AFM. No change to
the final rule is necessary in this regard.
Conclusion
After careful review of the available data, including the comments
noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public
interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described
previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of
the AD.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 37 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 19 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this proposed AD. It will take approximately 2 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the required modification at an
average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts will be
supplied by the manufacturer at no cost to operators. Based on these
figures, the cost impact of the modification required by this AD on
U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,280, or $120 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
99-01-14 Honeywell: Amendment 39-10979. Docket 98-NM-142-AD.
Applicability: Honeywell IC-600 integrated avionics computers
having part numbers 7017000-82401, -82402, -82403, -83401, -83402,
and -83403, as installed in, but not limited to, EMBRAER Model EMB-
145 series airplanes.
Note 1: This AD applies to Honeywell IC-600 integrated avionics
computers having part numbers 7017000-82401, -82402, -82403, -83401,
-83402, and -83403; as installed in any airplane, regardless of
whether the airplane has been modified, altered, or repaired in the
area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have
been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the
requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with
paragraph (c)
[[Page 1112]]
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent a ``random reset'' condition of the electronic flight
instrument system, which could affect the pilot's ability to control
the airplane, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the IC-600 integrated avionics computer, in accordance with
Honeywell Service Bulletin 7017000-22-43, dated March 24, 1998.
(b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
a Honeywell IC-600 integrated avionics computer having part number
7017000-82401, -82402, -82403, -83401, -83402, or -83403 on any
airplane; unless it has been modified in accordance with Honeywell
Service Bulletin 7017000-22-43, dated March 24, 1998.
(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall
submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(e) The modification shall be done in accordance with Honeywell
Service Bulletin 7017000-22-43, dated March 24, 1998. This
incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51. Copies may be obtained from Honeywell Inc., Business and
Commuter Aviation Systems, Box 29000, Phoenix, Arizona 85038. Copies
may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on February 12, 1999.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 28, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 99-48 Filed 1-7-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
