97-507. Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 1317-1318]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-507]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-533-809]
    
    
    Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Final Results 
    of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final results of antidumping duty new shipper review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On October 1, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the 
    Department) published the preliminary results of its new shipper review 
    of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless steel flanges (SSF) 
    from India (61 FR 51261). This review covers exports of this 
    merchandise to the United States by one manufacturer/exporter, Viraj 
    Forgings Ltd. (Viraj), during the period March 1, 1995 through August 
    31, 1995.
        We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our 
    preliminary results. We received no comments. The review indicates the 
    existence of no dumping margins for this firm for this period.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Killiam or John Kugelman, 
    Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
    telephone: (202) 482-2704 or 482-0649, respectively.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise 
    indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the 
    current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in 
    the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
    
    Background
    
        The antidumping duty order on SSF from India was published February 
    9, 1994 (59 FR 5994). On October 1, 1996, the Department published in 
    the Federal Register the preliminary results of its new shipper review 
    of the antidumping duty order on SSF from India (61 FR 51261). The 
    Department has now completed this new shipper review in accordance with 
    section 751 of the Act.
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The products covered by this order are certain forged stainless 
    steel flanges both finished and not finished, generally manufactured to 
    specification ASTM A-182, and made in alloys such as 304, 304L, 316, 
    and 316L. The scope includes five general types of flanges. They are 
    weld neck, used for butt-weld line connection; threaded, used for 
    threaded line connections; slip-on and lap joint, used with stub-ends/
    butt-weld line connections; socket weld, used to fit pipe into a 
    machined recession; and blind, used to seal off a line. The sizes of 
    the flanges within the scope range generally from one to six inches; 
    however, all sizes of the above-described merchandise are included in 
    the scope. Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are cast 
    stainless steel flanges. Cast stainless steel flanges generally are 
    manufactured to specification ASTM A-351. The flanges subject to this 
    order are currently classifiable under subheadings 7307.21.1000 and 
    7307.21.5000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
    purposes. The written description of the scope of this order remains 
    dispositive.
        The review covers one Indian manufacturer/exporter, Viraj, and the 
    period March 1, 1995 through August 31, 1995.
    
    Final Results of Review
    
        We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the 
    preliminary results. We received no comments. We have determined that a 
    margin of zero percent exists for Viraj for the period March 1, 1995 
    through August 31, 1995.
        The Department shall instruct the U.S. Customs Service to assess no 
    antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.
        Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective 
    for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these 
    final results, as provided for by section 751(a)(1) of the Act:
        (1) The cash deposit rate for Viraj will be zero percent;
        (2) for exporters not covered in this review, but covered in 
    previous reviews or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
    investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
    specific rate published for the most recent period;
        (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, previous 
    reviews, or the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, 
    the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent 
    period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and
        (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters 
    will continue to be 162.14 percent. This rate is the ``All Others'' 
    rate established in the LTFV investigation.
        This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility under 19 CFR Sec. 353.26 to file a certificate regarding 
    the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during the review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
    
    [[Page 1318]]
    
    assessment of double antidumping duties.
        This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APOs) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 353.34(d). Timely written 
    notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion 
    to judicial protective order is hereby requested.
        Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a 
    violation which is subject to sanction. This administrative review and 
    this notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 
    19 CFR Sec. 353.22.
        Dated: December 30, 1996.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 97-507 Filed 1-8-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/9/1997
Published:
01/09/1997
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final results of antidumping duty new shipper review.
Document Number:
97-507
Dates:
January 9, 1997.
Pages:
1317-1318 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-533-809
PDF File:
97-507.pdf