96-25062. Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders; Week of January 1 Through January 5, 1996  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 1, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 51280-51281]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-25062]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders; Week of January 1 
    Through January 5, 1996
    
    Office of Hearings and Appeals
        During the week of January 1 through January 5, 1996, the decisions 
    and orders summarized below were issued with respect to appeals, 
    applications, petitions, or other requests filed with the Office of 
    Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Energy. The following summary 
    also contains a list of submissions that were dismissed by the Office 
    of Hearings and Appeals.
        Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available 
    in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 
    Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours 
    of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also 
    available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a 
    commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and 
    orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide 
    Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.
    
        Dated: September 19, 1996.
    George B. Breznay,
    Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    
    Decision List No. 953
    
    Appeal
    
    Raytheon Company, 1/4/96, VFA-0103
    
        Raytheon Company filed an Appeal from a denial by the Office of 
    Economic Impact and Diversity of the Department of Energy (DOE/ED) of a 
    request for information which it had submitted under the Freedom of 
    Information Act (FOIA). Raytheon sought records related to a DOE Office 
    of Inspector General investigation of allegations of sexual harassment 
    or other inappropriate conduct by a DOE employee. DOE/ED withheld in 
    its entirety a report pursuant to FOIA Exemption 7(C). In considering 
    the Appeal, the DOE found that (i) DOE/ED need not make a 
    particularized finding regarding the privacy interests of each 
    individual that would be infringed by a release of information, (ii) 
    the names and identifying information of investigating officials named 
    in the report may be withheld; (iii) witnesses and sources have a 
    strong privacy interest in remaining anonymous and the public interest 
    favors protecting their identities; but (iv) some portions of the 
    report can be released. Accordingly, the matter was remanded in part to 
    DOE/ED for a new determination either releasing information other than 
    that protected by FOIA Exemption 7(C) or explaining the reasons for 
    withholding that information. The Appeal was denied in all other 
    respects.
    
    Personnel Security Hearing
    
    Nevada Operations Office, 1/4/96, VSO-0049
    
        A Hearing Officer from the Office of Hearings and Appeals issed an 
    Opinion regarding the eligibility of an individual for access 
    authorization under the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 710. The Hearing 
    Officer found that the individual had omitted and falsified significant 
    information concerning a DUI arrest from a written statement made in 
    response to an official inquiry regarding his eligibility for DOE 
    access authorization, and that the individual had suffered from alcohol 
    dependency. The Hearing Officer rejected the individual's arguments 
    that he had not falsified information in his written statement and 
    further found no evidence of significant rehabilitation or reformation 
    regarding the individual's falsification and omission. With regard to 
    the individual's alcohol dependency, the Hearing Officer found that the 
    individual had been rehabilitated. Given
    
    [[Page 51281]]
    
    the above findings, the Hearing Officer found that the individual's 
    access authorization should not be restored.
    
    Dismissals
    
        The following submissions were dismissed:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Name                               Case No.        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Center Equipment Company.....................  RF272-96155              
    El Toro Express..............................  RF272-77988              
    James J. Williams Trucking Co................  RF272-97883              
    Johnny Bowen Gulf Station #1.................  RF300-21710              
    New York State Electric & Gas................  RF300-21566              
    Redi-Froz Dist. Co...........................  RF272-97821              
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [FR Doc. 96-25062 Filed 9-30-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/01/1996
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-25062
Pages:
51280-51281 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-25062.pdf