98-26245. Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Amendment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 190 (Thursday, October 1, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 52691]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-26245]
    
    
    
    [[Page 52691]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP97-729-001]
    
    
    Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Amendment
    
    September 25, 1998.
        Take notice that on September 16, 1998, pursuant to Sections 7(c) 
    of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company 
    (Eastern Shore), P.O. Box 1769, Dover, Delaware 19903-1769, filed in 
    Docket No. CP97-729-001 an amendment to its certificate issued at 
    Docket No. CP97-729-000 (82 FERC para. 62,160 (1998)), on March 6, 1998 
    in order to increase the diameter of the 2.3 mile section of pipeline 
    replacement from the authorized 10 inches to 16 inches, all as more 
    fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission 
    and open to public inspection.
        On March 6, 1998, the Commission authorized Eastern Shore to 
    replace 2.3 miles of 6-inch pipeline with 10-inch pipeline, and .2 
    miles of 10-inch pipeline with 16-inch pipeline, all in connection with 
    a highway realignment project required by the State of Delaware 
    Department of Transportation (DelDOT). Eastern Shore states that as 
    presented in the original application, the estimated total cost of the 
    2.3 miles of 10-inch pipeline is $781,517. Eastern Shore also notes 
    that it requested and received a preliminary determination that rolled-
    in rate treatment would be appropriate for the entire cost of the 
    upsized pipeline segments. Eastern Shore is requesting the current 
    authorization to increase the diameter of the approved 2.3 mile 
    pipeline from 10 inches to 16 inches because, in late September, it 
    will file an application for authorization to construct and operate 
    additional facilities, which in combination with the change requested 
    herein, will enable Eastern Shore to provide additional firm advice to 
    existing customers.
        Eastern Shore believes that DelDOT will require the construction of 
    the 2.3 mile segment of pipeline prior to the Commission's approval of 
    the additional facilities that Eastern Shore proposes to file for 
    authorization with the Commission in September. Eastern Shore claims 
    that DelDOT's current construction schedule may require Eastern Shore 
    to begin construction as early as November of 1998. Consequently, 
    Eastern Shore asserts that it faces a timing dilemma that can best be 
    resolved by amending the Commission's March 9, 1998 order to allow it 
    to install the 16-inch diameter pipe. Eastern Shore claims that the 
    incremental cost of increasing the diameter of the 2.3 mile segment to 
    16-inches is $369,853, if undertaken in conjunction with the DelDOT 
    project. By comparison, Eastern Shore notes that if it were to install 
    the previously approved 10-inch pipeline and later loop the line, the 
    cost of installing the looping on new right-of-way without the benefit 
    of the ongoing highway construction would be in excess of the 
    $1,460,594 that Eastern Shore estimated in the original application as 
    the cost to separately install a 10-inch pipeline loop. Eastern Shore 
    states that it is not this time seeking a preliminary determination of 
    rolled-in rate treatment for the incremental cost of upsizing the 
    pipeline segment, it will however do so in its next rate case, assuming 
    the Commission approves the proposed facilities to be filed with the 
    Commission in September.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before October 9, 1998, file 
    with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural 
    Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
    considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
    will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
    person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
    party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
    accordance with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules and Regulations, a hearing will be held without 
    further notice before the Commission or its designee on this 
    application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time required 
    herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a 
    grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if 
    the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for Eastern Shore to appear or be represented at 
    the hearing.
    David P. Boergers,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-26245 Filed 9-30-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/01/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-26245
Pages:
52691-52691 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP97-729-001
PDF File:
98-26245.pdf