95-25184. Final Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Demolition of Historic Facilities at Wright- Patterson Air Force Base, OH  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 11, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 52899-52900]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-25184]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Final Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact 
    Statement for the Proposed Demolition of Historic Facilities at Wright-
    Patterson Air Force Base, OH
    
        The United States Air Force (Air Force) announces its intent to 
    prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to assess the potential 
    environmental impacts of the proposed demolition of multiple historic 
    facilities eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic 
    Places at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), Ohio. It is 
    anticipated that the proposed action and alternatives would impact the 
    following resources: Cultural resources (specifically, historic 
    properties), health and safety issues (e.g., asbestos and lead-based 
    paint), socioeconomics, visual resources, land use, transportation 
    (including parking), air quality, and noise. The EIS will provide the 
    decisionmakers and the public with the information required to 
    understand the future consequences of the proposed action and 
    alternatives.
        Due to defense cutbacks, military installations are being required 
    to reduce the number of square feet of base facilities. In addition, 
    any military construction of new facilities must be offset by a 
    reduction in the square footage of existing buildings. An ongoing 
    program to reduce excess square footage is in effect at WPAFB. This 
    program addresses a total of 54 facilities that have been proposed for 
    demolition through the year 2000.
        The base contains a number of significant cultural resources, 
    including the Huffman Prairie Flying Field, a portion of the Dayton 
    Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and five potential National 
    Historic Districts. Three of these districts, the Fairfield Air Depot 
    Historic District (FADHD), the Wright Field Historic District (WFHD), 
    and the Army Air Forces Historic District (AAFHD) contain the 
    facilities proposed for demolition. The FADHD includes the original 40-
    acre tract of land for the World War I Fairfield Air Depot that 
    represents the earliest military presence at what is now WPAFB, and a 
    portion of adjacent Wilbur Wright Field, which was leased by the 
    government during the war and later became part of the combined 
    Fairfield Air Depot complex. The WFHD includes the original Wright 
    Field complex, constructed between 1926 and 1931, that served as 
    headquarters for the Materiel Division of the U.S. Army Air Corps. The 
    AAFHD was constructed between 1941 and 1945 in support of World War II 
    mobilization and includes expanded wartime flying, modification, 
    testing, and maintenance facilities.
        Of the 54 facilities considered for demolition under the ongoing 
    program at WPAFB, 23 facilities are potentially eligible for nomination 
    to the National Register of Historic Places. The structures will be 
    evaluated for impacts resulting from the proposed action and reasonable 
    alternatives. It is anticipated that the cumulative impacts of past and 
    proposed future facility demolition will result in significant adverse 
    impacts to base cultural resources, and particularly to the three 
    historic districts. Alternatives to the proposed demolition under 
    consideration include:
    
    Alternative 1--No Action Alternative
    
        The buildings would be retained in their current capacity and would 
    be maintained and utilized in a manner similar to their present use.
    
    Alternative 2--Adaptive Reuse
    
        This alternative would consist of altering the existing use of the 
    facilities and either returning the facilities to their original use or 
    adapting the facilities for suitable alternative use. Many of the 
    historic facilities are no longer used for the function for which they 
    were constructed.
    
    Alternative 3--Mothballing
    
        This alternative is included in a category of alternatives known as 
    ``banking the facilities,'' whereby buildings are vacated but preserved 
    for future use. Mothballing would include documenting the significant 
    features, conducting a condition assessment, stabilizing and securing 
    the building, providing adequate ventilation to the interior, securing 
    utilities and mechanical systems, and developing and implementing a 
    maintenance and monitoring plan.
    
    Alternative 4--Stabilization
    
        This alternative is a type of ``banking'' alternative. 
    Stabilization would involve stabilizing the structure (e.g., bracing, 
    reinforcement), turning off utilities, controlling pests by securing 
    outside openings, securing the exterior from moisture penetration, 
    providing periodic monitoring, and developing a minimal maintenance 
    plan.
    
    Alternative 5--Pickling
    
        This alternative is a type of ``banking'' alternative. Pickling 
    would consist of turning off all utilities, with no environmental 
    controls.
    
    Alternative 6--Combination of Alternatives
    
        Under this alternative, a combination of the alternatives above 
    (demolition, no action, adaptive reuse, and banking) would be 
    implemented. Some buildings would be demolished while others could be 
    reused, banked for possible future use, or continued in their current 
    use.
        To provide a forum for public officials and the community to 
    provide 
    
    [[Page 52900]]
    information and comments, a scoping meeting will be held on Thursday, 
    October 26, 1995 from 7:30 to 9:30 PM at Fairborn High School 
    Auditorium, 900 E. Dayton-Yellow Springs Road, Fairborn, Ohio. The 
    purpose of this meeting is to present information concerning the 
    proposed action and alternatives under consideration and to solicit 
    public input regarding the issues to be evaluated and other reasonable 
    alternatives that should be included. For persons unable to attend the 
    scoping meeting, written comments and questions are welcome and will 
    receive the same weight as oral comments received at the scoping 
    meeting.
        To ensure that the Air Force will have sufficient time to consider 
    public input on issues and alternatives in the preparation of the draft 
    EIS, comments should be submitted to the address below within 30 days 
    after the date of the scoping meeting. The Air Force will accept 
    comments at the address below at any time during the environmental 
    impact analysis process.
        For further information concerning the preparation of the EIS for 
    the facility demolition program at WPAFB, or to provide written 
    comments, contact: Tom Perdue, 88 ABW/EME, 5490 Pearson Road, Wright-
    Patterson AFB, OH 45433-5332.
    Patsy J. Conner,
    Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
    [FR Doc. 95-25184 Filed 10-10-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/11/1995
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-25184
Pages:
52899-52900 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-25184.pdf