E6-16816. Redetermination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; BONIVA; Correction  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

    ACTION:

    Notice; correction.

    SUMMARY:

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice that appeared in the Federal Register of June 22, 2006 (71 FR 35918). The document announced that FDA had determined the regulatory review period for BONIVA. The notice provided that on or before August 21, 2006, anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit a request for a redetermination of the regulatory review period. A request for revision of the regulatory review period was filed for the product on July 25, 2006. FDA reviewed its records and found that the effective date of the investigational new drug application (IND) was incorrect because of a clerical error. Therefore, FDA is republishing a determination of the regulatory review period to reflect the corrected effective date for the IND. FDA has made a determination of the regulatory review period because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.

    ADDRESSES:

    Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://www.fda.gov/​dockets/​ecomments.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive.

    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).

    FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product BONIVA (ibandronate sodium). BONIVA is indicated for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for BONIVA (U.S. Patent No. 4,927,814) from Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated October 19, 2004, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of BONIVA represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.

    FDA has determined that the applicable adjusted regulatory review period for BONIVA is 3,122 days. Of this time, 2,817 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 305 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates:

    1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: October 30, 1994. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the IND became effective was on October 30, 1994.

    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: July 16, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug application (NDA) for BONIVA (NDA 21-455) was initially submitted on July 16, 2002.

    3. The date the application was approved: May 16, 2003. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-455 was approved on May 16, 2003.

    This redetermination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations Start Printed Page 59798of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,713 days of patent term extension.

    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination by December 11, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by April 9, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.

    Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

    Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Start Signature

    Dated: September 22, 2006.

    Jane A. Axelrad,

    Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. E6-16816 Filed 10-10-06; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

Document Information

Published:
10/11/2006
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice; correction.
Document Number:
E6-16816
Pages:
59797-59798 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 2004E-0444
PDF File:
e6-16816.pdf