94-25221. Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Wheel Inserts from Taiwan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 12, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-25221]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 12, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    (A-583-823)
    
     
    
    Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Wheel Inserts from 
    Taiwan
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Frederick or John Brinkmann, 
    Office of Antidumping Investigations, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
    telephone: (202) 482-0186 or (202) 482-5288, respectively.
    
    Initiation of Investigation
    
    The Petition
    
        On September 15, 1994, we received a petition filed in proper form 
    by Consolidated International Automotive, Inc. (petitioner). At the 
    request of the Department of Commerce (the Department), petitioner 
    filed supplements to support and clarify the petition's data on 
    September 30 and October 3, 1994. In accordance with 19 CFR 353.12 
    (1994), petitioner alleges that wheel inserts from Taiwan are being, or 
    are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value 
    within the meaning of section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
    (the Act), and that these imports are materially injuring, or threaten 
    material injury to, a U.S. industry.
        Petitioner states that it has standing to file the petition because 
    it is an interested party, as defined under section 771(9)(C) of the 
    Act, and because the petition is filed on behalf of the U.S. industry 
    producing the product subject to this investigation. If any interested 
    party, as described under paragraphs (C), (D), (E), or (F) of section 
    771(9) of the Act, wishes to register support for, or opposition to, 
    this petition, such party should file a written notification with the 
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
        Under the Department's regulations, any producer or reseller 
    seeking exclusion from a potential antidumping duty order must submit 
    its request for exclusion within 30 days of the date of publication of 
    this notice. The procedures and requirements regarding the filing of 
    such requests are contained in 19 CFR 353.14.
    
    Scope of Investigation
    
        The products covered by this investigation are wheel inserts, also 
    referred to as lug hole inserts and insert bushings, made from steel, 
    aluminum, brass or zinc. A wheel insert is a washer-like product with a 
    circular collar that protrudes into a stud hole to provide a protective 
    seat between a lug nut and an aluminum or alloy wheel mounted on ground 
    transportation vehicles. A wheel insert can be heat-treated or non 
    heat-treated, with or without knurls, and with or without surface 
    coatings. Surface coatings include, but are not limited to, chrome 
    plating, nickel plating, zinc plating (with or without wax coating), 
    oxide coating and powder coating.
        The products under investigation are currently classifiable under 
    subheading 8708.70.6060 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
    States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for 
    convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope 
    of this investigation is dispositive.
    
    United States Price and Foreign Market Value
    
        Petitioner based United States Price (USP) on a November 1993 price 
    quotation obtained for a standard black zinc plated wheel insert. The 
    terms of the price quotation were FOB Kaohsiung, Taiwan, with payment 
    based on an irrevocable sight letter of credit (L/C). Petitioner made a 
    deduction for credit. Credit was calculated using the short term 
    interest rate published by Taiwanese banks for September of 1993 and a 
    credit period of 55 days, the average of the 50-60 days stated on the 
    price quotation for delivery after receipt of the L/C.
        Petitioner based its estimate of foreign market value (FMV) on 
    constructed value (CV) claiming that no producers in Taiwan sell the 
    subject merchandise in Taiwan or to any third country markets.
        According to 19 CFR 353.12(b)(7), if petitioner is unable to 
    furnish information on foreign sales or costs, it must provide 
    information on production costs in the United States and then adjust 
    these costs to reflect for differences in the production costs between 
    the United States and the home market country of exportation.
        To calculate constructed value, petitioner adjusted its own 
    manufacturing costs for a standard black zinc plated wheel insert for 
    known differences in costs between the United States and Taiwan. We 
    adjusted the reported material costs to account for revenue received by 
    petitioner from the sale of scrap material. Because the plating costs 
    included selling, general and administrative expenses as well as the 
    profit of petitioner's plater, we have adjusted the plating expenses to 
    exclude these amounts.
        For overhead, utilities were adjusted using a ratio of Taiwanese to 
    U.S. electricity costs. Other components of petitioner's overhead were 
    adjusted using the ratio of Taiwanese to U.S. labor costs. Certain 
    components of overhead were not adjusted by petitioner. Because we view 
    this industry sufficiently labor intensive to justify using the ratio 
    of Taiwanese to U.S. labor costs to adjust overhead, we have applied 
    the labor ratio uniformly to all components of overhead (except 
    utilities). Additionally, because petitioner allocated overhead 
    expenses (inclusive of expenses related to petitioner's plating 
    operation) over payroll expenses (exclusive of plating wages), we have 
    added plating wages to petitioner's calculation of payroll expenses.
        Petitioner provided two hourly wage rates for Taiwanese 
    manufacturing workers, one obtained from private research, the other 
    obtained from a public source. Because of the Department's preference 
    for publicly available information, we selected the latter and adjusted 
    it as follows: 1) we disallowed petitioner's inclusion of an annual 
    bonus because petitioner's wage rate calculation did not include 
    bonuses; and 2) we inflated the wage rate for one year instead of two, 
    as calculated by petitioner, because we determined that the wage rate 
    was from 1992. The statutory minimum percentages of 10 percent for 
    selling, general and administrative expenses and eight percent for 
    profit were relied upon in petitioner's calculation.
        After the above adjustments were made, the recalculated dumping 
    margin for wheel inserts produced on a screw machine is 46.28 percent.
    
    Initiation of Investigation
    
        Pursuant to section 732(c) of the Act, the Department must 
    determine, within 20 days after a petition is filed, whether a petition 
    sets forth an allegation necessary for the initiation of an antidumping 
    duty investigation, and whether the petition contains information 
    reasonably available to the petitioner supporting the allegation.
        We have examined the petition for wheel inserts from Taiwan, as 
    amended, and have found that it meets the requirements of section 
    732(b) of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating an antidumping duty 
    investigation to determine whether imports of wheel inserts from Taiwan 
    are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than 
    fair value. If this investigation proceeds normally, we will make our 
    preliminary determination by February 22, 1995.
    
    International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
    
        Section 732(d) of the Act requires us to notify the ITC of these 
    actions and we have done so.
    
    Preliminary Determinations by the ITC
    
        The ITC will determine by October 30, 1994, whether there is a 
    reasonable indication that imports of wheel inserts from Taiwan are 
    materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry. 
    Pursuant to section 733(a) of the Act, a negative ITC determination 
    will result in the investigation being terminated; otherwise, the 
    investigation will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time 
    limits.
        This notice is published pursuant to section 732(c)(2) of the Act 
    and 19 CFR 353.13(b).
    
        Dated: October 5, 1994.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-25221 Filed 10-11-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/12/1994
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-25221
Dates:
October 12, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 12, 1994