94-25292. Airworthiness Directives; Jetstream Aircraft Limited (Formerly British Aerospace, Regional Airlines Limited) HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream Series 200 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-25292]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 13, 1994]
    
    
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Jetstream Aircraft Limited (Formerly 
    British Aerospace, Regional Airlines Limited) HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream 
    Series 200 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to supersede AD 81-09-03 R1, which 
    currently requires repetitively inspecting the rudder pedal adjusting 
    mounting bracket for cracks on Jetstream Aircraft Limited (JAL) HP137 
    Mk1 and Jetstream series 200 airplanes, and replacing any cracked 
    bracket. The Federal Aviation Administration's policy on aging 
    commuter-class aircraft is to eliminate, or in certain instances, 
    reduce the number of repetitions of certain short-interval inspections 
    when improved parts or modifications are available. The proposed action 
    would require replacing the mounting bracket with a new mounting 
    bracket of improved design as terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspections that are currently required by AD 81-09-03 R1. The actions 
    specified in the proposed AD are intended to prevent inadvertent rudder 
    movement caused by a cracked rudder pedal adjusting mounting bracket, 
    which could result in loss of rudder control.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from Jetstream Aircraft Limited, Manager Product Support, Prestwick 
    Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW Scotland; telephone (44-292) 79888; 
    facsimile (44-292) 79703; or Jetstream Aircraft Inc., Librarian, P.O. 
    Box 16029, Dulles International Airport, Washington, DC, 20041-6029; 
    telephone (703) 406-1161; facsimile (703) 406-1469. This information 
    also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Raymond A. Stoer, Program Officer, 
    Brussels Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Europe, Africa, and Middle 
    East Office, c/o American Embassy, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; telephone 
    (322) 513.3830; facsimile (322) 230.6899; or Mr. John P. Dow, Sr., 
    Project Officer, Small Airplane Directorate, Airplane Certification 
    Service, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 
    telephone (816) 426-6932; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has determined that reliance on critical repetitive 
    inspections on aging commuter-class airplanes carries an unnecessary 
    safety risk when a design change exists that could eliminate, or in 
    certain instances, reduce the number of repetitions of those critical 
    inspections. In determining what inspections are critical, the FAA 
    considers (1) the safety consequences of the airplane if the known 
    problem is not detected by the inspection; (2) the reliability of the 
    inspection such as the probability of not detecting the known problem; 
    (3) whether the inspection area is difficult to access; and (4) the 
    possibility of damage to an adjacent structure as a result of the 
    problem.
        These factors have led the FAA to establish an aging commuter-class 
    aircraft policy that requires incorporating a known design change when 
    it could replace a critical repetitive inspection. With this policy in 
    mind, the FAA recently conducted a review of existing AD's that apply 
    to JAL HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream series 200 airplanes. Assisting the FAA 
    in this review were (1) the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is 
    the airworthiness authority for the United Kingdom; (2) JAL; (3) the 
    Regional Airlines Association (RAA); and (4) several U.S. and foreign 
    operators of the affected airplanes.
        From this review, the FAA has identified AD 81-09-03 R1, Amendment 
    39-4150, as one that should be superseded with a new AD that would 
    require a modification that could eliminate the need for short-interval 
    and critical repetitive inspections. AD 81-09-03 R1 currently requires 
    repetitively inspecting the rudder pedal adjusting mounting bracket for 
    cracks on Jetstream Aircraft Limited HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream series 200 
    airplanes, and replacing any cracked bracket.
        JAL has developed Modification No. 5162, which introduces a new 
    rudder pedal adjusting mounting bracket with increased sectional 
    dimension, part number (P/N) 1379111E 1. Included with this 
    modification are Instructions to Modification No. 5162, Part 1 and Part 
    2, Issue 1, dated June 1981.
        As a result of the previously discussed AD review, the CAA listed 
    the actions specified in the referenced service instructions as 
    mandatory with CAA AD 003-07-81 in order to assure the continued 
    airworthiness of these airplanes in the United Kingdom.
        This airplane model is manufactured in the United Kingdom and is 
    type certificated for operation in the United States under the 
    provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant 
    to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA has kept the FAA 
    informed of the situation described above.
        Based on its aging commuter-class aircraft policy and after 
    reviewing all available information including that received from the 
    CAA, the FAA has determined that AD action should be taken to (1) 
    eliminate the repetitive short-interval inspections required by AD 81-
    09-03 R1, Amendment 39-4150; and (2) continue preventing inadvertent 
    rudder movement caused by a cracked rudder pedal adjusting mounting 
    bracket, which could result in loss of rudder control.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other JAL HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream series 200 
    airplanes of the same type design, the proposed AD would supersede AD 
    81-09-03 R1 with a new AD that would (1) retain the inspections of the 
    rudder pedal adjusting mounting bracket for cracks and require 
    replacing any cracked part as required by the current AD; and (2) 
    require replacing this mounting bracket with an improved part of 
    increased sectional dimension, P/N 1379111E 1, as terminating action 
    for the repetitive inspections. The proposed inspection would be 
    accomplished in accordance with Jetstream Service Bulletin No. 9/10, 
    dated April 28, 1981. The proposed replacement would be accomplished in 
    accordance with the Instructions to Modification No. 5162, Part 1 and 
    Part 2, Issue 1, dated June 1981.
        The FAA estimates that 11 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 160 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed modification, and 
    that the average labor rate is approximately $55 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $1,800 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total 
    cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $116,600.
        All 11 of the affected airplanes are HP137 Mk1's; there are no 
    Jetstream series 200 airplanes registered in the United States, but 
    they are type certificated for operation in the United States. 
    According to FAA records, none of these HP137 Mk1 airplanes are in 
    operation or anywhere near operating condition. For this reason, JAL no 
    longer stocks Modification No. 5162, but can develop modification kits 
    within three months after order. Since there are no airplanes currently 
    in operation, the cost impact of the proposed AD would be narrowed to 
    only those owners/operators returning their airplane to operation.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing AD 81-09-03 R1, Amendment 
    39-4150, and by adding a new AD to read as follows:
    
    Jetstream Aircraft Limited: Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD. Supersedes AD 
    81-09-03 R1, Amendment 39-4150.
    
        Applicability: HP137 Mk1 and Jetstream Series 200 airplanes (all 
    serial numbers), certificated in any category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated after the effective date of 
    this AD, unless already accomplished.
        To prevent inadvertent rudder movement caused by a cracked 
    rudder pedal adjusting mounting bracket, which could result in loss 
    of rudder control, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service, unless already 
    accomplished (compliance with AD 81-09-03 R1), inspect the rudder 
    pedal adjusting mounting bracket for cracks in accordance with 
    Jetstream Service Bulletin (SB) No. 9/10, dated April 28, 1981.
        (1) If cracks are found, prior to further flight, replace the 
    mounting bracket with an improved part of increased sectional 
    dimension, part number (P/N) 1379111E 1, in accordance with the 
    Instructions to Modification No. 5162, Part 1 and Part 2, Issue 1, 
    dated June 1981.
         This replacement is referenced as Modification No. 5162.
        (2) If no cracks are found, reinspect at intervals not to exceed 
    100 hours TIS until Modification No. 5162 is incorporated.
        (b) Upon the accumulation of 15,000 hours TIS or within the next 
    200 hours TIS, whichever occurs later, replace the rudder pedal 
    adjusting mounting bracket with an improved part of increased 
    sectional dimension, P/N 1379111E 1 (Modification No. 5162), in 
    accordance with the Instructions to Modification No. 5162, Part 1 
    and Part 2, Issue 1, dated June 1981.
        (c) Incorporating Modification 5162 as specified in paragraph 
    (a)(1) or (b) of this AD eliminates the repetitive inspection 
    requirement of this AD.
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial and repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Brussels Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Europe, Africa, Middle East office, FAA, c/o 
    American Embassy, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. The request should be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Brussels Aircraft 
    Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Brussels Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (f) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the documents referred to herein upon request to Jetstream Aircraft 
    Limited, Manager Product Support, Prestwick Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 
    2RW Scotland; telephone (44-292) 79888; or Jetstream Aircraft Inc., 
    Librarian, P.O. Box 16029, Dulles International Airport, Washington, 
    DC, 20041-6029; or may examine these documents at the FAA, Central 
    Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on October 5, 1994.
    John R. Colomy,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-25292 Filed 10-12-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/13/1994
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
94-25292
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before December 16, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 13, 1994, Docket No. 94-CE-14-AD
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13