94-25319. Order Tentatively Establishing Exemption Criteria for Regional and Commuter Airlines From Certain Notice Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 197 (Thursday, October 13, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-25319]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: October 13, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Office of the Secretary
    [Order 94-10-5 and Docket 49814]
    
     
    
    Order Tentatively Establishing Exemption Criteria for Regional 
    and Commuter Airlines From Certain Notice Requirements
    
    SUMMARY: We are publishing the order in its entirety as an appendix to 
    this document.
    
    DATES: Issued in Washington, DC, October 6, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, U.S. Department 
    of Transportation, Office of Aviation Analysis, room 6401, 400 Seventh 
    Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-1061.
        On August 23, 1994, Congress enacted the Federal Aviation 
    Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-305), which, among 
    other things, establishes notice requirements on airlines intending to 
    suspend service at certain communities, effective February 1, 1995. 
    Specifically, the law states, ``An air carrier may not terminate 
    interstate air transportation from a nonhub airport included on the 
    Secretary's latest published list of such airports, unless such air 
    carrier has given the Secretary at least 45 days' notice before such 
    termination.''\1\ There are several exemptions to the notice 
    requirement. Carriers are exempt from filing a suspension notice if 
    they are experiencing a sudden or unforeseen financial emergency 
    including natural weather-related emergencies, equipment-related 
    emergencies, or strikes. Other exemptions include seasonal suspensions, 
    cases in which the airline has served the community for 180 days or 
    less, cases in which the airline provides jet service from another 
    airport serving the same community, and cases in which the departing 
    airline arranges with another airline to provide replacement service so 
    that the service continues uninterrupted.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The final version of the law contains a technical drafting 
    error. The ``Definitions'' section of the law (section 41715(d)(1)), 
    includes a definition of ``nonhub airport'' by reference, but the 
    reference is incorrect--i.e., it refers to section 41731(a)(3), 
    which in fact defines a ``hub airport'', but should have referred to 
    section 41731(a)(4). The Senate version, which was adopted in 
    conference, referred to section 419(k)(4) of the Federal Aviation 
    Act, which correctly defined a ``nonhub airport''. During the time 
    that the bill was under consideration, the Federal Aviation Act and 
    other related statutes were codified. The incorrect citation above 
    occurred in the translation to the codified statute. We are 
    implementing the provision as intended and will seek corrective 
    legislation.
        \2\The Department will issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    addressing those issues shortly.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the law allows for waivers from the notice requirements 
    for regional and commuter airlines. Specifically, the law requires 
    that, ``Before January 1, 1995, the Secretary shall establish terms and 
    conditions under which regional/commuter carriers can be excluded from 
    the termination notice requirement.''
        First, we wish to make clear that nothing in the legislation or in 
    this order has any effect on the notice requirements already in place 
    in connection with the Department's essential air service (EAS) 
    program. All carriers will continue to be subject to all applicable 
    laws and regulations pertaining to the EAS program. In case of 
    conflict, the more stringent and longer notice requirements shall 
    prevail.
        By this order we tentatively propose to establish criteria for 
    waivers for regional and commuter airlines. The legislative history of 
    this bill indicates that the primary focus is on jet service, i.e., on 
    ensuring that communities receive at least 45 days' notice before jet 
    service to them is terminated. Consistent with that intent, the 
    legislation requires the Secretary to carve out exemptions for regional 
    and commuter carriers. (The legislation defines a regional/commuter 
    carrier as an airline operating under 14 CFR Part 135, or one operating 
    under 14 CFR Part 121 that operates exclusively with 70-seat or smaller 
    aircraft.) Because the primary focus is on jet service, we propose to 
    exempt regional and commuter carriers from the requirement to file a 
    45-day notice if jet service would remain at the community. Absent the 
    availability of jet service, the focus of the new law would also appear 
    not to dictate a notice obligation if a community retained two or more 
    non-jet carriers following the suspension of service by another. We 
    would propose, therefore, to grant exemptions from the 45-day filing 
    requirement if two or more regional/commuter carriers would remain at 
    the community, i.e., the third to last commuter/regional carrier would 
    not have to file a notice. We would not exempt the second to last 
    carrier from a notice obligation. Requiring such notice in that 
    situation would obviate the prospect that one of two carriers serving a 
    community could suspend service abruptly even if it was providing the 
    lion's share of the service, as long as the remaining carrier was 
    technically meeting the community's EAS definition.
        We will establish a 30-day period from the issue date of this order 
    for interested parties to show cause why we should not adopt our 
    tentative conclusions as final. Any objection should demonstrate how 
    our tentative decision is not consistent with the applicable law and 
    must include the conditions under which regional/commuter airlines 
    should be exempted from the notice requirements. After reviewing all 
    the objections, if any, we will issue an order taking final action on 
    the waivers for commuter and regional carriers.
        This order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56(i).
        Accordingly,
        1. The Department tentatively establishes waivers for regional and 
    commuter airlines from the notice requirements contained in the Federal 
    Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-305). The 
    waivers would apply under either of the following two conditions: (1) 
    if the affected community would continue to receive scheduled jet 
    service, or (2) if the affected community would continue to receive 
    scheduled air service from two or more regional/commuter carriers;
        2. The Department directs all interested parties to show cause 
    within 30 days of the issue date of this order why we should not 
    finalize the tentative conclusions in paragraph 1 above; and
        3. We will publish a copy of this order in the Federal Register.
        By:
    Patrick V. Murphy,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 94-25319 Filed 10-12-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-62-P-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
10/13/1994
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-25319
Dates:
Issued in Washington, DC, October 6, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: October 13, 1994, Order 94-10-5 and Docket 49814