98-26967. Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 54570-54572]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-26967]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-59-AD; Amendment 39-10827; AD 98-21-18]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Dornier Model 328-100 series airplanes that 
    requires replacement of the de-icing system timer with a new, improved 
    timer. This amendment is prompted by reports of possible overheating 
    and debonding of the propeller blade due to a failure of the de-icing 
    system timer and a dormant short circuit in the propeller de-icer 
    system. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent such 
    overheating and debonding of the propeller blade, which could result in 
    reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective November 17, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of November 17, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Fairchild Dornier, Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH, P.O. Box 1103, 
    D-82230 Wessling, Germany. This information may be examined at the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
    
    [[Page 54571]]
    
    Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Dornier Model 328-100 
    series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on March 30, 
    1998 (63 FR 15105). That action proposed to require replacement of the 
    de-icing system timer with a new, improved timer.
    
    Explanation of Changes Made to This Final Rule
    
        Since the issuance of that Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), 
    the FAA has determined that the descriptions of what prompted the AD, 
    and of the unsafe condition, in the proposed rule require 
    clarification. Those descriptions are revised to read ``possible 
    overheating and debonding of the propeller blade due to a failure of 
    the de-icing system timer and a dormant short circuit in the propeller 
    de-icer system. Such overheating and debonding of the propeller blade 
    could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.''
        The FAA also has determined that a more accurate description of the 
    unsafe condition of the propeller blade addressed by this AD is to use 
    the descriptor ``debonding,'' rather than ``disbonding'' (as used in 
    the proposed rule) and has revised the final rule accordingly.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received.
        One commenter, the airframe manufacturer, states that all airplanes 
    in the fleet have incorporated the A-5639-3 propeller timer/monitor, 
    and includes copies of records to verify the installations. Therefore, 
    the manufacturer considers that there is no necessity for the issuance 
    of an AD.
        The FAA does not concur with the manufacturer's position that there 
    is no necessity to issue an AD to address the identified unsafe 
    condition. The FAA does acknowledge that the fleet may currently be in 
    compliance with the requirements of this AD (installation of the A-
    5639-3 propeller timer). However, the propeller vendor, Hartzell, has 
    advised the FAA that the locations of approximately 40 of the A-5639-2 
    timers cannot be accounted for. Therefore, this AD must be issued to 
    ensure that the addressed unsafe condition addressed by this final rule 
    is not reintroduced by an inadvertent reinstallation of an A-5639-2 
    timer/monitor.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 25 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per 
    airplane to accomplish the required replacement, and that the average 
    labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will be furnished by 
    the manufacturer at no cost to the operators. Based on these figures, 
    the cost impact of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,500, 
    or $60 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of 
    this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in 
    the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-21-18  Dornier Luftfahrt GMBH: Amendment 39-10827. Docket 98-NM-
    59-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 328-100 airplanes, serial numbers 3005 
    through 3039 inclusive, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent possible overheating and debonding of the propeller 
    blade due to a failure of the de-icing system timer and a dormant 
    short circuit in the propeller de-icer system, which could result in 
    reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, replace 
    the de-icing system timer with a new improved timer in accordance 
    with Dornier Service Bulletin SB-328-30-164, dated April 30, 1996.
        (b) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install 
    a de-icing system timer having part number A-5639-2 or 4E2947-2, on 
    any airplane.
    
    [[Page 54572]]
    
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (e) The replacement shall be done in accordance with Dornier 
    Service Bulletin SB-328-30-164, dated April 30, 1996. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from FAIRCHILD DORNIER, DORNIER Luftfahrt 
    GmbH, P.O. Box 1103, D-82230 Wessling, Germany. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (f) This amendment becomes effective on November 17, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 1, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-26967 Filed 10-9-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/17/1998
Published:
10/13/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-26967
Dates:
Effective November 17, 1998.
Pages:
54570-54572 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-59-AD, Amendment 39-10827, AD 98-21-18
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-26967.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13