96-26346. Almonds Grown in California; Change in Quality Control Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 15, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 53607-53608]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-26346]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 981
    
    [Docket No. FV96-981-3FIR]
    
    
    Almonds Grown in California; Change in Quality Control 
    Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    changing the quality control requirements currently prescribed under 
    the California almond marketing order. The marketing order regulates 
    the handling of almonds grown in California and is administered locally 
    by the Almond Board of California (Board). This rule removes the 
    exemption from inspection for the Peerless variety of almonds sold 
    inshell. This change is needed to bring the administrative rules and 
    regulations into conformance with amendments to the marketing order 
    recently approved by a majority vote of producers. In addition, this 
    change will better reflect current industry practices because most 
    almonds are already inspected, including the Peerless variety.
    
    DATES: November 14, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen M. Finn, Marketing 
    Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, room 
    2530-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456: telephone: (202) 
    720-1509, Fax # (202) 720-5698; or Martin Engeler, California Marketing 
    Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, 
    2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; telephone: 
    (209) 487-5901, Fax # (209) 487-5906. Small businesses may request 
    information on compliance with this regulation by contacting: Jay 
    Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456; telephone (202) 720-2491; Fax # (202) 720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
    Order No. 981 (7 CFR Part 981), as amended, regulating the handling of 
    almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' 
    This order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act 
    of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 115 handlers of almonds who are subject to 
    regulation under the order and approximately 7,000 producers of almonds 
    in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms, which includes 
    handlers, have been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 
    CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, 
    and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual 
    receipts of less than $500,000. The majority of handlers and producers 
    of California almonds may be classified as small entities.
        This rule finalizes a change in the order's administrative rules 
    and regulations to remove an exemption from inspection for the Peerless 
    variety of almonds sold inshell as bleaching stock. It also modifies 
    the definition of adjusted kernel weight so that adjusted kernel weight 
    for the Peerless variety is based on actual weight, consistent with 
    other almonds, rather than calculated with a predetermined conversion 
    factor known as a shelling ratio. The majority of handlers already have 
    all almonds inspected, including the Peerless variety. Therefore, this 
    rule will better reflect current industry practice. In addition, this 
    rule is needed to bring the administrative rules and regulations into 
    conformance with amendments to the marketing order recently approved by 
    a majority vote of producers. Since virtually all of the Peerless 
    almonds sold inshell are currently inspected, there is little or no 
    impact expected on small businesses.
        Therefore, the AMS has determined that this action will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
        The interim final rule was issued on August 14, 1996, and published 
    in the Federal Register (61 FR 42990, August 20, 1996), with an 
    effective date of August 21, 1996. That rule amended Secs. 981.401 and 
    981.442 of the rules and regulations in effect under the order. That 
    rule provided a 30-day comment period which ended September 19, 1996. 
    No comments were received.
        The almond marketing order authorizes quality control provisions 
    which include a requirement that almonds must be inspected prior to 
    processing to determine the percentage of inedible kernels in each lot, 
    and to determine the adjusted kernel weight of almonds in each lot. 
    Inedible kernels are reported to individual handlers and the Board, and 
    handlers are required to dispose of a quantity of almonds equal to 
    their inedible obligation as determined by the inspection. Inedible 
    kernels are disposed of to non-human consumption outlets for such uses 
    as animal feed or crushing into oil. Adjusted kernel weight is reported 
    to handlers by the Federal-State Inspection Service (FSIS). Handlers 
    are then required to report adjusted kernel weight to the Board, who 
    uses the information to report industry statistics.
    
    [[Page 53608]]
    
        The rules and regulations under the marketing order currently 
    exempt from inspection the Peerless variety of almonds used as 
    bleaching stock and sold inshell. When the quality control regulations 
    were initially implemented, it was determined there was no need to 
    establish the percentage of inedible kernels of almonds sold inshell, 
    which at that time were predominately of the Peerless variety, because 
    inedible kernels could not be removed from product sold inshell and 
    thus could not be disposed of in non-human consumption outlets. 
    Therefore, inshell almonds, including Peerless, are exempt from meeting 
    the inedible disposition obligation. However, in order to determine the 
    kernel weight of Peerless almonds sold inshell for reporting to the 
    Board, a predetermined shelling ratio contained in the marketing order 
    has been used in the absence of inspection. This shelling ratio 
    converted the weight of inshell almonds to a shelled weight, or kernel 
    weight. Over time, the total quantity and varieties of all almonds sold 
    inshell have increased, while Peerless bleaching stock sales have 
    declined. There has also been an increased desire and need to obtain an 
    accurate product weight for growers, handlers, and the Board. Thus, it 
    has become common industry practice to have inspections performed on 
    Peerless almonds sold inshell, as with other varieties sold inshell, 
    regardless of the inspection exemption.
        Consistent with the Act, the almond marketing order was recently 
    amended by a majority vote of producers to require that the weight of 
    inshell almonds be determined by weighing a representative sample of 
    such almonds. Previously, predetermined shelling ratios were used to 
    determine the kernel weight. Thus, the shelling ratios were removed 
    from the order. The purpose of the quality control amendments was to 
    reflect current industry practices as referenced above, and to provide 
    more accurate information for reporting purposes.
        The amendments to the order necessitate conforming changes to the 
    administrative rules and regulations. Section 981.442 of the quality 
    control regulations is revised to remove an inspection exemption for 
    Peerless inshell almonds. Thus, all almonds, regardless of form or 
    variety, will be inspected.
        In addition, Sec. 981.401 is revised to remove the exemption for 
    Peerless almonds from the definition of adjusted kernel weight. 
    Currently, the adjusted kernel weight of Peerless inshell almonds is 
    based on a predetermined weight contained in the shelling ratio table 
    that was removed from the marketing order. Since Peerless inshell 
    almonds will be required to have inspection, the actual kernel weight 
    will be determined, thus providing an accurate weight.
        The information collection requirements contained in the referenced 
    sections have been previously approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been 
    assigned OMB number 0581-0071.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is found that 
    finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as published in the 
    Federal Register (61 FR 42990, August 20, 1996) will tend to effectuate 
    the declared policy of the Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
    
        Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 981 which 
    was published at 61 FR 42990 on August 20, 1996, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: October 7, 1996.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-26346 Filed 10-11-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/14/1996
Published:
10/15/1996
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-26346
Dates:
November 14, 1996.
Pages:
53607-53608 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV96-981-3FIR
PDF File:
96-26346.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 981